A 130 t/h biomass circulating fluidized bed (BCFB) boiler combustion system model, considering the chloride release and pollutant emissions during the biomass combustion, was established using the Modelica language. The effects of the biomass feed amount, limestone amount, excess air coefficients, and different ratios of primary and secondary air on the boiler furnace temperature and flue gas composition (O2, CO2, SO2, HCl, and KCl) were investigated. Upon the biomass feed amount step change, the variation ranges of NO and KCl concentrations were very large, which were 18.58 and 21.16% of the before step value, respectively. The step change of the limestone input had little effect on b ed temperature in the dense phase zone, but it could obviously reduce the SO2 concentration. The concentration of SO2 in flue gas decreased by 22.56% when the limestone input increased by 50%. The removal rate of SO2 gradually decreased with the increase of the limestone amount. The SO2 desulfurization rate decreased by 68.30% when the amount of limestone increased from 0.0275 to 0.0825 kg/s. More NO would be generated and KCl concentration would be significantly reduced with the increase of the excess air coefficient. When the ratio of primary and secondary air was 4:6, the NO concentration in flue gas was lower than 86.06 mg/Nm3.
A 130 t/h biomass circulating fluidized bed (BCFB) boiler combustion system model, considering the chloride release and pollutant emissions during the biomass combustion, was established using the Modelica language. The effects of the biomass feed amount, limestone amount, excess air coefficients, and different ratios of primary and secondary air on the boiler furnace temperature and flue gas composition (O2, CO2, SO2, HCl, and KCl) were investigated. Upon the biomass feed amount step change, the variation ranges of NO and KClconcentrations were very large, which were 18.58 and 21.16% of the before step value, respectively. The step change of the limestone input had little effect on b ed temperature in the dense phase zone, but it could obviously reduce the SO2concentration. The concentration of SO2 in flue gas decreased by 22.56% when the limestone input increased by 50%. The removal rate of SO2 gradually decreased with the increase of the limestone amount. The SO2 desulfurization rate decreased by 68.30% when the amount of limestone increased from 0.0275 to 0.0825 kg/s. More NO would be generated and KClconcentration would be significantly reduced with the increase of the excess air coefficient. When the ratio of primary and secondary air was 4:6, the NO concentration in flue gas was lower than 86.06 mg/Nm3.
In recent years, the biomass
direct combustion power generation
technology, which is one of the effective ways to deal with the waste
biomass resources on a large scale and realize clean energy utilization,
has been rapidly promoted and applied in many countries and regions
around the world. The total installed capacity of biomass direct-fired
power generation units is expected to reach 7.5 GW by the end of 2020
in China.[1] Among them, the biomass circulating
fluidized bed (BCFB) is one of the most important combustion equipment
due to its technical advantages in many aspects, such as favorable
fuel adaptability, easy furnace temperature control, and low NO emission level.[2,3] However,
the biomass entered in the BCFB generally has the characteristics
of variable fuel types, high moisture content and volatile content,
high alkali metalcontent and chlorinecontent, and low calorific
value in actual operation.[4] These will
easily lead to many problems such as poor combustion stability, unstable
thermal load, serious chlorinecorrosion, and slagging.[5,6] In extreme cases, it may even cause fluidization failure, which
presents a serious challenge to the safety and stability of power
plant units and low pollutant discharge operation.The heat
and mass transfer characteristics and pollutant discharge
rules in the combustion system are the basis of optimizing operation
and parameter regulation for the BCFB. It is worth noting that due
to the limitation of safe operation or test cost, it is difficult
to carry out a more comprehensive test study on the characteristics
of power plant units. Therefore, modeling and simulation have become
an important means to study the dynamic characteristics of the power
plant system, as well as an important platform for operating parameter
optimization and advanced control algorithm verification. Up to now,
a lot of in-depth research studies on the characteristics of coal-fired
circulating fluidized bed (CCFB) boiler units have been carried out.[7−10] However, compared to the CCFB, the BCFB is generally smaller, with
a stand-alone capacity of 20–50 MW. In general, the external
heat exchanger is not set on the BCFB system. These differences make
it difficult to control the bed temperature, bed pressure, and other
parameters of the BCFBcombustion system.In the field of BCFB
modeling, Xie et al.[11] established a three-dimensional
Eulerian–Lagrangian model
to perform the full-loop simulation of the combustion process of municipal
solid waste (MSW) and coal in an industrial-scale circulating fluidized
bed boiler. The numerical results showed that serious wall erosion
took place in the horizontal flue duct and the entrance zone of the
cyclone. The concentration distribution of CO2 was almost
opposite to that of O2 in the whole boiler. The emissions
of NO and N2O decreased, while the emission of SO2 increased with the increase of the coal mass share. The NO emission could be effectively reduced by the increase
of the secondary air ratio, while the variation trend of SO2 emission was not obvious. Using the Fortran language, Gungor[12] established a circulating fluidized bed model
for mixed combustion of different biomass (rice husk, wood, olive
cake, and sawdust) and coal. The riser temperature, solid particle
concentration, and concentration distribution of pollutants (e.g.,
O2, CO, and NO) were studied. The simulation results showed
that the air staged could enhance combustion. For the industrial-scale
BCFBcombustor, with the reduction of excess air coefficient, the
reduction of NO would lead to higher
CO emission.Song et al[13] established
a 220 t/h simplified
two-dimensional BCFB furnace model using Fluent software to study
the combustion status of biomass materials, the internal temperature
field, and concentration distribution of components such as O2 and CO2 in the furnace. The simulation results
revealed that the drastic combustion position was at a height of 4
m above the bottom of the furnace, where the vast majority of primary
air was consumed. Through the analysis of the combustion of biomass
fuels with different particle sizes in the furnace, it was found that
the combustion of small particles was more complete and the consumption
of O2 was higher.Compared with pan class="Chemical">coal, due to the
high content of chlorine in biomass,
the chloride gases generated during the combustion will cause high-temperature
corrosion problems of various alloys. The reason was that the chloride
gases (e.g., Cl2, HCl, NaCl, and KCl) caused direct corrosion
by accelerating the oxidation of the metal alloys, and the phenomenon
was the active oxidation.[14] However, most
of the BCFB models established at present rarely did consider the
chloride emissions in the biomass combustion process, which was difficult
to reflect the characteristics of high chlorinecontent in biomass.
This is also an important difference in combustion characteristics
between biomass and coal. Therefore, a 130 t/h BCFB boiler combustion
system model based on the object-oriented Modelica language was established
on the Mworks simulation platform in this paper. Among them, the generation
of chloride in the biomass combustion process was considered and the
influence of operating parameters (e.g., the biomass feed amount,
primary and secondary air volume, excess air coefficient, different
primary, and secondary air ratios) on the internal temperature of
the furnace and emission characteristics of compositions (O2, CO2, SO2, HCl, and KCl) in flue gas were
investigated. These studies can provide guidance and data reference
for system optimization operation and control. Compared with the computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, the combustion system model based on
Mworks did not pay too much attention to the detailed description
of heat transfer, mass transfer, and internal flow field but only
paid attention to the variation of outlet parameters of equipment
or the subarea. Most of the simulation results could be obtained within
1 s. The fast calculation speed is conducive to further process-oriented
control and optimization.
Mathematical Models
Compared with coal, the biomass fuels had the characteristics of
high oxygencontent, high volatile content, and low carbon and ash
contents as the power plant fuel.[15] There
are significant differences in the release and migration mechanism
of chlorine for different kinds of biomass under different combustion
atmospheres. Currently, a large number of studies[16−19] have shown that chlorine enters
the gas phase mainly in the form of HCl and KCl during the combustion
of biomass. At 700–900 °C, chlorine basically enters 100%
into the gas phase, while potassium partially enters the gas phase.[20−23] All of the potassium volatilized from the biomass existed in the
form of KCl in the gas phase,[24] while the
remaining chlorine entered the gas phase in the form of HCl within
the operating temperature range of the BCFB. The proportion of solid
potassium transformed into gaseous potassium in the biomass fuel used
in the CBFB was 5% (700 °C), 10% (800 °C), and 30% (900
°C), respectively. The proportion of gaseous potassium at different
temperatures was determined by the interpolation method. The productions
of HCl and KCl in the gas phase were calculated by the mass conservation
of each element.
Volatilization Characteristic
Models and Combustion
Models for Volatiles
The volatile components of different
types of biomass devolatilization almost differ little, mainly including
CO, CO2, H2, CH4, and CH. CH generally refers to the hydrocarbons
with higher molecular weights, such as ethylene (m = 2, n = 4), ethane (m = 2, n = 6), etc. C2H6 is selected in this
paper.The variations of the above component content with the
combustion temperature were calculated according to the following
formulas.[25,26]The volatile content combustion reaction and the kinetic equations
are shown in Table .[25,27]
Table 1
Volatile Content
Combustion Kinetic
Equationsa
chemical reaction
reaction
rate mol/(m3·s)
reaction rate constant (1/s)
2H2 + O2 → 2H2O
CH4 + 2O2 → CO2 + 2H2O
rCH4 = kCH4CCH4CO2
rC2 H6 =–kC2 H6CC2 H6CO2
CO2 + C → 2CO
rCO2 = NCπdc2kCO2CCO2
In Table , the unit of reaction
rate of CO2 is mol/s. NC is the number of coke particles.
In Table , the unit of reaction
rate of CO2 is mol/s. NC is the number of coke particles.
Chloride
Calculation Model
The kinetic
conversion equation of solid chlorine into gaseous chlorine is:The
interpolation function between
the potassium precipitation ratio and the temperature was established
by a piecewise linear interpolation method:If T(i) ≤ T < T(i + 1), thenwhere pcK (i) is the precipitation ratio set
of potassium at different temperatures, %. T(i) is the set of the BCFBcombustion temperature range,
K. pcCl-K is the percentage of Cl consumed
to form KCl, %.The chloridecomposition concentration in flue
gas is
NO Generation
and Reduction Model
The nitrogen oxides produced during the
biomass combustion consist of NO, NO2, and N2O. Among them, the volume fraction of NO accounted for more than
90%,[28,29] which was the main removal component considered
in the flue gas denitration process. Therefore, it is necessary to
study the production law of NO in flue gas under different combustion
conditions. Compared with the CCFB boilers, the BCFB generally has
a lower temperature (750–900 °C) in the furnace; therefore,
the productions of thermal NO and rapid
NO are very small.[29] We only study the variation of fuel-NO production here.The conversion rate of fuel-NO can be calculated by the following
empirical formula.[30]In the high-temperature environment
in the furnace, the reduction
reactions will occur between NO with bio-char and CO:[31]where k1 = 0.1826, k2 = 0.00786, and k3 = 0.002531.The reaction kinetic constants in formulas (17)
and (18) are:
Reaction
Formation Model and Reduction Reaction
Model for SO2
It is assumed that the sulfur released
from biomass is preferentially oxidized to SO2 and released
in the dense phase area. The reaction processes are as follows:Then, the SO2 removal rate
is as follows:
Conservation
of Mass and Energy in Each Zone
Mass
Conservation Equation
The
mass conservation equation for class solid particle in each zone:The mass conservation equation of fluecomponents in each zone:If the chemical reaction of substances entering the cyclone
separator
is ignored and there is no accumulation of particles inside the separator,
the separation efficiency η of the cyclone separator
is calculated as follows[32]The mass conservation
equation of the separator isThe
solid mass conservation equation of the return valve is
Energy Conservation Equation
The
energy conservation equation in each zone is
Modeling
and Simulation
Physical Objects of the
BCFB
This
boiler is equipped with a 30 MW high-temperature and high-pressure
condensing steam turbine generator set. The structure and the operating
parameters of the BCFB are shown in Figure a and Table . The BCFBcombustion system consisted of a combustion
chamber, a cyclone separator, and a U-shaped loop-seal device.
Figure 1
Diagrams of
the 130 t/h BCFB structure and model structure on Mworks.
(a) Diagram of the BCFB structure. (b) Schematic diagram of BCFB model
structure decomposition.
Table 2
Operation
Parameters of the BCFB
parameters
values
units
furnace
size (width × depth × height)
8.76 × 5.4 × 30
m
temperature of primary
air
175
°C
temperature of secondary air
175
°C
fuel amount
35.286
t/h
volume flow of primary
air
101 974
m3/h
volume flow of secondary air
101 974
m3/h
fuel particle size
0–100
mm
bed material size (sands)
1–2
mm
boiler maximum continuous
rating (BMCR)
143
t/h
Diagrams of
the 130 t/h BCFB structure and model structure on Mworks.
(a) Diagram of the BCFB structure. (b) Schematic diagram of BCFB model
structure decomposition.The combustion
system of a 130 t/h BCFB boiler (manufactured by
Jinan Boiler Group Co., Ltd., China) in a power plant was modeled
on the Mworks simulation platform using Modelica language, which is
an object-oriented structured modeling language based on the idea
of noncausal modeling. It has the advantages of high model reuse and
flexible and efficient modeling for complex physical objects.[33,34]The combustion system simulation model of the BCFB is shown
in Figure b. It consisted
of
the input module (e.g., biomass fuel feed (Bio), limestone feed (Lim),
primary air (PA), and secondary air (SA)), combustion chamber module
(e.g., dense phase zone (DeZ), suspension phase zone (SuZ), and dilute
phase zone (DiZ)), cyclone separator module, and loop-seal module.The main fuel used in the operation of the boiler was a mixture
of bark (40%), sawdust (30%), firewood (20%), wheat straw (5%), and
corn straw (5%). The proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of the
mixed biomass fuel are shown in Table .
Table 3
Proximate and Ultimate Analysis on
the Mixed Biomass Fuel (as Received)
proximate
analysis (wt %)
ultimate
analysis (wt %)
lower heat
value (Q) (MJ/kg)
moisture (M)
volatile matter (V)
ash content
(A)
fixed carbon (Fc)
Car
Har
Oar
Nar
Sar
Clar
Kar
10.96
40.01
45.2
1.32
13.47
31.32
3.45
23.72
0.17
0.01
0.08
0.104
Model Reliability Verification
The
reliability of the established 130 t/h BCFB boiler combustion system
was verified. The Dassl integration algorithm was used for the simulation
because it is an implicit, high-order multistep integration algorithm.
This algorithm shows a very stable performance in solving the complex
model and provides good control of errors and calculation efficiency
of numerical solutions.[35] Under the 100%
BMCR conditions of BCFB, the outlet parameters of the combustion system
model were compared with the actual measured value, as shown in Table .
Table 4
Comparison between the Model Output
and Measured Values under 100% BMCR Conditions
parameters
model output
measurements
relative
error (%)
bed temperature
of the dense phase zone
1132 K
1058 K
6.99
oxygen content of flue gas at the furnace
outlet
5.19%
5.00%
3.80
NO concentration of flue gas at the furnace outlet
93.08 mg/Nm3
96.00 mg/Nm3
3.04
SO2 concentration
of flue gas at the furnace outlet
(limestone was not added)
30.10 mg/Nm3
32.00 mg/Nm3
5.94
The relative errors between the oxygencontent, NO concentration,
SO2concentration of flue gas at the furnace outlet of
the model and the corresponding measured values were all within 6%,
which indicated that the established BCFB boiler combustion system
model had high reliability. The emission concentration of SO2 in BCFB operation could meet the emission standard of SO2 (50–100 mg/Nm3) in Shandong province, China, when
the limestone was not added into the combustion system. This is due
to the fact that most of the biomass raw materials are with low sulfurcontent.The calculation results of HCl and KCl gas generated
during combustion
were compared with the potassium and chlorine release of Swedish wood
explored by FactSage in the literature.[36] Based on 1000 kg of fuel, the molar quantities of potassium and
chlorine in Swedish wood were 3.41 and 2.6, respectively. The comparisons
between the results of the calculation method applied in this paper
and those of the references are shown in Figure .
Figure 2
Comparisons between HCl and KCl Gas Simulation
Results and Reference.
Comparisons between HCl and KCl Gas Simulation
Results and Reference.It can be seen that the
yields of HCl and KCl were in good agreement
with the variation trend of the results in the literature[36] between 800 and 1150 K. In thermochemical equilibrium
calculations, for a given composition, temperature, and pressure of
the system, the stable species and their state are identified by minimizing
the total Gibbs free energy of the system while maintaining the mass
conservation constraint. Although the equilibrium analysis is a powerful
tool to predict the stable species during the chemical process, there
are some disadvantages of this method applied to the combustion case.[37] If the calculations are performed under the
assumption that the residence time of the system is significantly
longer than the chemical kinetic time scale and all of the species
are homogeneously mixed and available for the reaction, then the results
can be considered qualitative and used as an application reference.[38] This indicates that the calculation methods
in the paper of could be predicted HCl, KCl amount and reflected the
both ones change trends to a certain extent.
Results and Discussions
Dynamic Response Simulation
Research
The combustion system of the BCFB boiler is a complex
nonlinear system
with strong parameter coupling and large combustion response hysteresis.[39,40] There are many factors affecting the BCFB boiler, such as the primary
air volume, secondary air volume, biomass feed amount, slag discharge
amount, and circulation ratio. The changes of these operating parameters
have a complex interleaving effect on the BCFB. At the same time,
the safety requirement of boiler systems is high and some system parameters
are difficult to be measured directly.[41] It is difficult to obtain the coupling relationship between the
above-mentioned factors and the bed temperature, bed pressure, and
pollutant concentration in flue gas through simple tests. Therefore,
it was important means to obtain the qualitative and quantitative
effects of parameter disturbance on system output through numerical
simulation.
Step Test of the Biomass Feed Amount
The analysis of the influence of input parameters on the output parameters,
including the response time and the variation history, is helpful
to realize the dynamic characteristics of the BCFB boiler system.
When the boiler load needs to be changed, the biomass feed amount
is changed first and the primary and secondary air volumes are changed
proportionally to complete this control process. Assuming that the
BCFB boiler was under a stable 100% BMCR condition, the biomass feed
increased by 10% (from 9.8 to 10.78 kg/s) at 2000 s. Meanwhile, the
excess air coefficient was set at 1.2 and the ratio of primary and
secondary air was 1:1. The variations of furnace temperature, bed
heat transfer coefficient, and flue gas components (O2,
CO2, NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl) at the outlet of
the BCFBcombustion system are shown in Figure .
Figure 3
Dynamic response curve of the step test of the
biomass feed amount.
(a) Response curves of temperature and heat transfer coefficient in
each phase region. (b) Response curves of O2 and CO2 contents in flue gas of the furnace exit. (c) Response curves
of NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl concentrations in flue gas at
the furnace exit.
Dynamic response curve of the step test of the
biomass feed amount.
(a) Response curves of temperature and heat transfer coefficient in
each phase region. (b) Response curves of O2 and CO2contents in flue gas of the furnace exit. (c) Response curves
of NO, SO2, HCl, and KClconcentrations in flue gas at
the furnace exit.As can be seen from Figure a, the temperatures
in the dense phase zone, the suspension
phase zone, and the dilute phase zone in the furnace gradually increased
when the biomass feed amount was increased by 10%. The temperature
in the suspension zone was slightly higher than the temperature in
the dense phase zone. This phenomenon was consistent with the similar
conclusions in the literature[25,27] that the temperature
in the upper part of the riser was higher than that in the bottom.
However, the heat transfer coefficient in the dense phase zone was
higher than that in the dilute phase zone and suspension phase zone
because there were more solid particles in the dense phase zone. The
reason for this phenomenon was that the heat transfer coefficient
between the bed and the wall in a circulating fluidized bed increased
with the increase of temperature but decreased significantly with
the increase of void ratio.[42]It
can be seen from Figure b that the O2content in flue gas at the outlet
of the furnace first increased rapidly, then decreased slowly, and
reached a new steady-state value. The reason for this phenomenon was
that the step-increased biomass feed amount and air volume at 2000
s led to an increase in the O2content in flue gas because
of the limitation of the biomass combustion speed. Then, the O2content in flue gas decreased because a large amount of oxygen
was consumed by the biomass combustion. The new steady-state value
of the O2content was slightly higher than the original
value. In this process, the variation trend of the CO2content
was almost opposite to that of the O2content. As can be
seen from Figure c,
the concentrations of NO and SO2 in the flue gas showed
a trend of first increasing and then slowly decreasing. The new steady-state
value of the NO concentration was far less than the value before the
step, which was decreased by 18.58% of the before value. The variation
of the SO2concentration was relatively insignificant.
The new steady-state value of the KClconcentration was far higher
than the value before the step, which was increased by 21.16% of the
before value. This indicated that the step change of the biomass feed
amount has a great influence on the concentration of NO and KCl in
flue gas. The variation of SO2concentration was relatively
insignificant.The concentration of KCl in flue gas gradually
increased, while
the concentration of HCl decreased. In addition, the difference between
HCl and KClconcentration decreased from 22.92 to 1.65 mg/Nm3.
Step Test of the Limestone Input
In the combustion process of sulfur-containing carbon fuel, the input
of limestone has an important practical significance for the removal
of SO2 in flue gas. The input amount of limestone designed
for the BCFB under 100% BMCR was 0.056 kg/s. On this basis, the limestone
was increased (or decreased) by 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%, respectively.
The variation trends of bed temperature in the dense phase zone and
the concentration of SO2 at the furnace outlet are shown
in Figure .
Figure 4
Step change
response curve of the limestone input. (a) Bed temperature
in the dense phase zone. (b) SO2 concentration in flue
gas at the furnace exit. (c) Variation of the desulfurization rate
and SO2 concentration in flue gas at the furnace outlet
with the limestone input amount.
Step change
response curve of the limestone input. (a) Bed temperature
in the dense phase zone. (b) SO2concentration in flue
gas at the furnace exit. (c) Variation of the desulfurization rate
and SO2concentration in flue gas at the furnace outlet
with the limestone input amount.Comparison between Figure a,b shows that the step change of the limestone input had
no obvious effect on bed temperature in the dense phase zone of the
BCFB. For instance, the dense zone temperature decreased by only 0.028%
compared to the value when the limestone input increased by 50%. The
reason for this phenomenon was that the amount of limestone added
to the BCFB boiler system was relatively small compared to the amount
of bed materials and biomass fuel in the furnace. The addition of
limestone had little effect on the variation of total solids in the
dense phase zone. The concentration of SO2 in flue gas
decreased by 22.56% when the limestone input increased by 50%. In
addition, the effect of an increase or decrease in the amount of limestone
on the bed temperature in the dense phase zone was approximately symmetrical
distribution, while the variation trend of SO2concentration
in flue gas at the furnace outlet was asymmetric distribution. The
decrease process of the limestone input amount had a great impact
on the SO2concentration. The reason for this phenomenon
may be that the addition of a desulfurizer such as limestone would
affect the desulfurization reaction and reduce the concentration of
SO2, thus influencing the desulfurization rate. As shown
in Figure c, the SO2 desulfurization rate decreased by 68.30% when the amount
of limestone increased from 0.0275 to 0.0825 kg/s. The decrease of
SO2concentration would not be obvious when the amount
of the desulfurizer was higher. This also indicated that the addition
of limestone should be determined by the economic cost and desulfurization
efficiency in the process of SO2 removal from limestone.
Excess Air Coefficient Variation Test
The excess air coefficient is the most important parameter that affects
the boiler combustion efficiency[43] and
has a great influence on the variations of combustion temperature
and flue gas composition. It was assumed that the biomass feed amount
was maintained at 9.8 kg/s in the simulation test, and the ratio of
primary to secondary air was 1:1. The excess air coefficient increased
from 1.1 to 1.3. The temperature distribution in the furnace, the
heat transfer coefficient between the bed and the wall distribution,
and the flue gas composition (O2, CO2, NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl) at the furnace outlet are shown in Figure .
Figure 5
Influence of the excess
air coefficient on the heat transfer coefficient,
temperature of the furnace, and the composition of flue gas. (a) Heat
transfer coefficient and temperature of the furnace. (b) Concentrations
of O2 and CO2 in flue gas at the furnace exit.
(c) Concentrations of NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl in flue gas
at the furnace exit.
Influence of the excess
air coefficient on the heat transfer coefficient,
temperature of the furnace, and the composition of flue gas. (a) Heat
transfer coefficient and temperature of the furnace. (b) Concentrations
of O2 and CO2 in flue gas at the furnace exit.
(c) Concentrations of NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl in flue gas
at the furnace exit.It can be seen from Figure a that with the increase
of the excess air coefficient, the
temperatures and heat transfer coefficients in the dense phase zone,
suspension zone, and dilute phase zone decreased. The reason for this
phenomenon is that the exhaust heat loss is closely related to the
flue gas flow. The greater the excess air ratio was, the greater the
flue gas flow would be, and the exhaust heat loss increased significantly,[44] resulting in the temperatures decreased in all
zones.Figure b shows
that the oxygencontent of flue gas gradually increased and the CO2concentration decreased with the increase of air volume.
When excess air increased up to 1.3, the O2concentration
in the flue gas at the outlet of the furnace was close to 6%. To ensure
the combustion efficiency of the BCFB boiler, the O2concentration
at the outlet of the furnace is generally kept below 6%.It
can be seen from Figure c that the concentrations of HCl and SO2 in the
flue gas gradually decreased with the increase of the excess air coefficient,
but the influence was not significant. The change of the excess air
coefficient had a great influence on the concentrations of NO and
KCl in flue gas. Meanwhile, the increase of the excess air coefficient
would improve the NO formation. The reason may be that the increase
of the excess air coefficient enhanced the formation of the oxidizing
atmosphere in the combustion chamber, which promoted the NO generation
because the NO emission was shown to be more sensitive to the oxygenconcentration.[45] Reduction of the excess
air coefficient could reduce the concentration of NO. However, too
low excess air coefficient would lead to incomplete combustion of
fuel and reduce boiler efficiency.[46]To control NO emissions and ensure high boiler efficiency, the
excess air coefficient of the BCFB boiler should be between 1.15 and
1.25. The decrease of the KClconcentration was mainly caused by the
dilution of the flue gas concentration due to the increase of the
air volume, and the decrease of gaseous KCl generation due to the
decrease of the furnace temperature.
Ratio
of Primary and Secondary Air Test
At present, air staged
combustion is one of the most effective
and attractive technology to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions because
it does not require expensive new equipment.[47] Proper air distribution can not only reduce the nitrogen oxide emissions
but also ensure the efficient combustion of biomass. Assuming that
the BCFB boiler was under a stable 100% BMCR condition, the biomass
feed amount was kept at 9.8 kg/s. The limestone was not added to the
BCFB boiler, and the ratio of primary to secondary air (PA/SA) was
6:4, 5:5, and 4:6, respectively. The temperature distribution in the
furnace, the heat transfer coefficient between the bed and the wall
distribution, and the composition of flue gas at the outlet of the
furnace (O2, CO2, NO, SO2, HCl, and
KCl) are shown in Figure . Three schemes with primary and secondary air ratios of 6:4,
5:5, and 4:6 were considered for comparative analysis to ensure the
normal fluidization of the circulating fluidized bed.
Figure 6
Influence of the ratio
of primary and secondary air on the heat
transfer coefficient, temperature of the furnace, and the composition
of flue gas. (a) Heat transfer coefficient and temperature of the
furnace. (b) Concentrations of O2 and CO2 contents
in flue gas at the furnace exit. (c) Concentrations of NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl in flue gas at the furnace exit.
Influence of the ratio
of primary and secondary air on the heat
transfer coefficient, temperature of the furnace, and the composition
of flue gas. (a) Heat transfer coefficient and temperature of the
furnace. (b) Concentrations of O2 and CO2contents
in flue gas at the furnace exit. (c) Concentrations of NO, SO2, HCl, and KCl in flue gas at the furnace exit.It can be seen from Figure a that the temperature in the dense phase zone increased
with
the decrease of the primary air share. The reason is that the heat
carried by the flue gas away from the dense phase zone was decreased
due to the decrease of primary air. Compared with PA/SA = 5:5, the
dense phase temperature decreased significantly with the increase
of the primary air share (PA/SA = 6:4). When the PA/SA = 4:6, the
temperature of the whole furnace was more uniform, and the temperature
difference between the suspension zone and the dense phase zone reduced
more obviously. Figure b shows that the reduction of primary air share will lead to a slight
increase of the O2content and CO2content in
flue gas at the furnace outlet.As can be seen from Figure c, the NO concentration
at the furnace outlet decreased with
the decrease of the primary air share. From the perspective of uniform
temperature distribution in the furnace and reduction of nitrogen
oxides, the optimal air staged ratio is PA/SA = 4:6. Although the
concentrations of SO2 and KCl increased when PA/SA = 4:6,
the increase of the above substances did not significantly vary.
Conclusions
Based on the Modelica language,
a 130 t/h BCFBcombustion system
model considering chloride release and pollutant emissions (e.g.,
SO2 and NO) in flue gas was established on the MWorks platform.
The effects of operating parameters on the bed temperature, heat transfer
coefficient, and pollutant emissions of the combustion system were
studied. The relative errors between the oxygencontent, NO concentration,
SO2concentration of flue gas at the furnace outlet of
the model, and the corresponding measured values were all within 6%.
When the biomass feed amount increased, there was a great influence
on the concentrations of NO and KCl. The concentrations of NO and
SO2 showed a trend of first increasing and then slowly
decreasing. The KClconcentration gradually increased, while the HClconcentration decreased, and the difference between the KClconcentration
and the HClconcentration decreased. The step change of the limestone
input amount had little effect on bed temperature in the dense phase
zone, but it could obviously reduce the SO2concentration.
The effect of the limestone amount increasing or decreasing on the
bed temperature in the dense phase zone was approximately symmetrical
distribution, while the variation trend of SO2concentration
was asymmetric distribution. The decrease of the limestone input amount
had a great impact on the SO2concentration. When the excess
air coefficient increased, more NO was generated and KClconcentration
decreased significantly. From the point of minimum NO generation,
the optimal air staged combustion was PA/SA = 4:6.