| Literature DB >> 34056402 |
Ran Chen1, Weitao Jiang1, Yusong Liu1, Yanfang Wang2, Hai Fan2, Xuesen Chen1, Xiang Shen1, Chengmiao Yin1, Zhiquan Mao1.
Abstract
Crop rotation in fruit trees is an effective approach for addressing some of the problems of continuous cropping. To determine whether aged peach orchard soil is suitable for planting apple trees, we studied the effects of two substances abundant in aged peach orchard soil-amygdalin and benzoic acid-on the soil microbial community structure, soil enzyme activity, and the growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings. Soils treated with amygdalin (T1), benzoic acid (T2), and a mixed solution of amygdalin and benzoic acid (T3) were used to plant M. hupehensis Rehd. seedlings. Compared with fallow (control) soil, the soil microbial community structure, soil enzyme activities, and root protective enzyme activities, leaf chlorophyll content, and net photosynthetic rate decreased in the three treatments. The biomass and root index of M. hupehensis Rehd. seedlings significantly decreased. Compared with T3, the plant height, ground diameter, fresh weight, dry weight, root length, root surface area, root volume, and root respiration rate of M. hupehensis Rehd. seedlings in T2 in 2015 (2016 in parentheses) decreased by 19.3% (12.6%), 8.7% (7.1%), 21.2% (13.3%), 9.1% (19.6%), 7.9% (25.3%), 40.7% (28.8%), 46.2% (21.1%), and 44.2% (27.5%), respectively. Compared with T3, the same variables in T1 in 2015 (2016 in parentheses) decreased by 34.9% (16.7%), 27.6% (9.8%), 53.6% (19.4%), and 50% (20.5%), 24.1% (31.4%), 55.1% (37.6%), 63.2% (28.2%), and 47.0% (28.7%), respectively. Thus, the inhibitory effect of T3 was the strongest, followed by T2 and T1. In sum, amygdalin and benzoic acid are harmful substances in aged peach orchard soil that inhibit the growth of M. hupehensis Rehd. seedlings.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34056402 PMCID: PMC8154122 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Effect of Amygdalin and Benzoic Acid on the Plant Biomass of Malus hupehensis Rehd. Seedlingsa,b
| date | treatment | height (cm) | ground diameter (mm) | fresh weight (g) | dry weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2015 | CK | 29.2a | 4.1a | 11.4a | 3.7a |
| T1 | 21.2b | 2.9b | 5.6b | 2.0b | |
| T2 | 17.1c | 2.3c | 3.3c | 1.1c | |
| T3 | 13.8d | 2.1c | 2.6c | 1.0c | |
| July 15, 2016 | CK | 75.6a | 12.8a | 76.9a | 34.5a |
| T1 | 64.0b | 10.2b | 62.3b | 27.3b | |
| T2 | 61.0b | 9.9b | 57.9b | 27.0b | |
| T3 | 53.3c | 9.2c | 50.2b | 21.7c |
Means followed by the same lowercase letter within each column in the same year are not significantly different (p > 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ground diameter: stem diameter near the ground, and the weight average of three M. hupehensis Rehd. seedlings (three repeats).
Effect of Amygdalin and Benzoic Acid on the Root Growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. Seedlinga,b
| date | treatment | root length (cm) | root surface area (cm2) | root volume (cm3) | root respiration rate (nmol min–1 g–1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2015 | CK | 1005.7a | 204.2a | 3.5a | 857.7a |
| T1 | 481.9b | 103.8b | 1.9b | 454.7b | |
| T2 | 396.9b | 78.6bc | 1.3bc | 431.7b | |
| T3 | 365.6b | 46.6c | 0.7c | 240.9c | |
| July 15, 2016 | CK | 6412.7a | 1875.8a | 85.6a | 910.4a |
| T1 | 4914.9b | 1255.8b | 61.8b | 561.2b | |
| T2 | 4510.7b | 1101.1b | 55.6b | 552.0b | |
| T3 | 3371.6c | 784.1c | 44.4c | 400.0c |
Means followed by the same lowercase letter within each column in the same year are not significantly different (p > 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
FW: fresh weight.
Effects of Different Treatments on SOD, POD, CAT, and MDA Activities in the Roots of Malus hupehensis Rehd. Seedlingsa,b,c
| date | treatment | SOD (U g–1 FW) | POD (U min–1 g–1 FW) | CAT (U min–1 g–1 FW) | MDA (mmol g–1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2015 | CK | 247.1a | 22.9a | 28.8a | 3.2a |
| T1 | 174.4b | 12.9b | 10.1b | 5.1b | |
| T2 | 142.2b | 10.2c | 8.5b | 5.6c | |
| T3 | 103.6c | 5.3d | 7.9b | 6.6d | |
| July 15, 2016 | CK | 254.6a | 23.7a | 32.6a | 4.6a |
| T1 | 194.0b | 16.4b | 14.8b | 5.5b | |
| T2 | 156.3c | 14.4c | 14.1b | 6.1b | |
| T3 | 122.2d | 10.5d | 11.4c | 7.1c |
Means followed by the same lowercase letter within each column in the same year are not significantly different (p > 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
SOD: superoxide dismutase, POD: peroxidase, CAT: catalase, and MDA: malondialdehyde.
FW: fresh weight.
Effects of Amygdalin and Benzoic Acid on the Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthetic Parameters of Malus hupehensis Rehd. Seedlingsa,b,c
| date | treatment | chlorophyll | chlorophyll | carotenoid (mg g–1 FW) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2015 | CK | 19.0a | 15.4a | 4.0a | 11.6a | 187.7a | 4.8a | 286.0a |
| T1 | 17.9b | 14.8b | 3.9b | 8.0b | 136.3b | 3.8b | 293.3a | |
| T2 | 17.4b | 14.3c | 3.8b | 7.3bc | 125.0b | 3.6bc | 290.3a | |
| T3 | 16.1c | 12.8d | 3.7c | 6.0c | 114.0b | 3.1c | 288.0a | |
| July 15, 2016 | CK | 19.8a | 16.5a | 4.2a | 13.3a | 201.7a | 5.6a | 311.7a |
| T1 | 18.8b | 15.8b | 4.1b | 9.3b | 164.0b | 4.5b | 293.7a | |
| T2 | 18.4b | 15.4c | 4.0c | 8.6b | 157.3b | 4.3b | 298.7a | |
| T3 | 17.3c | 14.3d | 3.8d | 7.6c | 133.7c | 3.5c | 289.3a |
Means followed by the same lowercase letter within each column in the same year are not significantly different (p > 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Pn: net photosynthetic rate, Gs: stomatal conductance, Ci: internal CO2 concentration, and Tr: transpiration rate.
FW: fresh weight.
Figure 1Principal component analysis (PCA) of the T-RFLP profiles of fungi among different treatments. Period A: July 15, 2015, PC1 and PC2 accounted for 61.20 and 21.40% of the variance, respectively. Period B: July 15, 2016, PC1 and PC2 accounted for 87.60 and 9.90% of the variance, respectively. The samples treated with different treatments were amygdalin (T1), benzoic acid (T2), and a mixed solution of amygdalin and benzoic acid (T3).
Effects of Amygdalin and Benzoic Acid on the Soil Microbial Community Structure and Soil Enzyme Activitya,b
| date | treatment | number of soil bacteria (×105 CFU g–1) | number of soil fungi (×103 CFU g–1) | neutral phosphatase (mg g–1 d–1) | urease (mg g–1 d–1) | sucrase (mg g–1 d–1) | catalase (mL g–1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2015 | CK | 78.0a | 54.3c | 38.9a | 0.14a | 10.4a | 0.66a |
| T1 | 58.0b | 65.7b | 26.3b | 0.10b | 7.5b | 0.56b | |
| T2 | 55.7b | 66.3b | 25.3b | 0.10b | 7.3b | 0.55b | |
| T3 | 41.0c | 84.0a | 20.9c | 0.06c | 5.7c | 0.43c | |
| July 15, 2016 | CK | 70.0a | 62.3c | 45.3a | 0.15a | 11.6a | 0.75a |
| T1 | 58.3b | 74.3b | 28.1b | 0.11b | 8.8b | 0.65b | |
| T2 | 55.3b | 77.7b | 27.5b | 0.10b | 8.4b | 0.64b | |
| T3 | 41.7c | 91.0a | 21.8c | 0.07c | 6.2c | 0.52c |
Means followed by the same lowercase letter within each column in the same year are not significantly different (p > 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
CFU: colony-forming unit.