Literature DB >> 34056386

DFT and Experimental Studies on the Mechanism of Mercury Adsorption on O2-/NO-Codoped Porous Carbon.

Hui Liu1,2, Junyuan Li1, Kaisong Xiang1, Shudan He1, Fenghua Shen1,2.   

Abstract

The utilization of O2 and NO in n class="Chemical">flue gas to activate the raw porous carbon with auxiliary plasma contributes to an effective mercury (Hg)-removal strategy. The lack of in-depth knowledge on the Hg adsorption mechanism over the O2-/NO-codoped porous carbon severely limits the development of a more effective Hg removal method and the potential application. Therefore, the generation processes of functional groups on the surface during plasma treatment were investigated and the detailed roles of different groups in Hg adsorption were clarified. The theoretical results suggest that the formation of functional groups is highly exothermic and they preferentially form on a carbon surface, and then affect Hg adsorption. The active groups affect Hg adsorption in a different manner, which depends on their nature. All of these active groups can improve Hg adsorption by enhancing the interaction of Hg with a surface carbon atom. Particularly, the preadsorbed NO2 and O3 groups can react directly with Hg by forming HgO. The experimental results confirm that the active groups cocontribute to the high Hg removal efficiency of O2-/NO-codoped porous carbon. In addition, the mercury temperature-programmed desorption results suggest that there are two forms of mercury present on O2-/NO-codoped porous carbon, including a carbon-bonded Hg atom and HgO.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34056386      PMCID: PMC8154138          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Due to its persistence, bioaccumulation, and hypertoxicity, n class="Chemical">mercury (Hg) has attracted worldwide attention in environmental pollution management.[1−3] Minamata Convention on Mercury has thus been signed by 128 countries as an international effort to reduce the environmental contamination with Hg.[4−6] Fossil fuel utilization and nonferrous smelting are regarded as the main sources of anthropogenic pollution of Hg.[7−9] Therefore, Hg elimination from flue gases of coal combustion and nonferrous smelting has become a serious concern in mercury-emission control. The removal of Hg using n class="Chemical">carbon materials as sorbents is one of the best Hg-emission control technologies.[10−12] The Hg-capture ability of carbon materials is closely related with their surface chemistry. To improve Hg-removal efficiency, active agents, such as oxygen, halogens, and sulfur, were often used to impregnate the carbon to create an additional active center.[13−15] However, such chemical impregnation methods are considered as time-consuming and not ecofriendly.[16−18] It is thus attractive to develop a simple, quick, and ecofriendly method to enhance the Hg-removal ability of carbon. In practical application, the Hg-removal performance of carbon has a close relationship with the flue gas component.[19−21] The effects of O2 and NO on Hg removal by carbon were studied and it was suggested that O2 and NO in flue gas could generate new surface-active groups, thereby facilitating Hg adsorption.[22] The previous findings indicate that if O2 and NO present in flue gas can be utilized to enhance Hg adsorption, the cost of carbon activation will be significantly reduced and the pollutant NO will be removed as a cobenefit. To achieve high Hg-removal efficiency, it is essential to enhance the positive effects of O2 and NO on Hg adsorption, namely, enhancing the adsorption of O2 and NO on carbon to create more active sites for Hg adsorption. In this aspect, nonthermal plasma coupled with porous carbon (PC) provides an achievable strategy.[23−25] High-energy electrons formed in plasma can excite O2 and NO to generate energetic species, including N*, O*, NO*, NO2*, O3*, etc.[26−28] Such energetic species are more active to react with carbon than the gaseous molecules.[29] In addition, the porous carbon with a large surface area and a high pore volume offers fantastic opportunities to quickly and efficiently capture these energetic species.[30,31] Therefore, abundant active groups for Hg adsorption can be rapidly generated on a porous carbon surface by plasma. An effective strategy for Hg removal is thus established based on the combination of nonthermal plasma and porous carbon. The Hg-removal ability of porous n class="Chemical">carbon is closely related to the functional groups generated by plasma. However, not all of the functional groups are involved in Hg removal.[30,32,33] Therefore, to develop a more effective sorbent, it is important to elucidate the generation processes of functional groups on porous carbon, as well as their detailed roles in Hg removal. Nevertheless, the experimental method has some limitations in clarifying the functional group formation and Hg adsorption on a porous carbon surface because the microcosmic processes of energetic species and Hg adsorption are hard to be directly distinguished.[34] Fortunately, the density functional theory (DFT) method provides a powerful tool for understanding the adsorption mechanism at the molecular level.[35−37] However, no systematic theoretical study on the formation and evolution processes of functional groups on carbon during plasma treatment has been carried out. The detailed adsorption and oxidation processes of Hg on different types of groups remain to be explored. In present work, the formation of different types of functional groups on porous n class="Chemical">carbon during plasma treatment under O2 and NO was investigated by applying the density functional theory method. The detailed role of each type of group involved in Hg adsorption on carbon was identified. The pathways for Hg adsorption on porous carbon functionalized by plasma were proposed. Hg-removal experiments were conducted to study the contribution of different groups in Hg removal. This work provides molecular insight into the Hg removal by O2- and NO-coadsorbed porous carbon, which helps to design a more effective method for simultaneously removing Hg and NO from flue gas.

Results and Discussion

Adsorption of Energetic Species on a Porous Carbon Surface

The adsorption of energetic species generated by nonthermal plasma is the first step toward the formation of functional groups for Hg0 adsorption on porous n class="Chemical">carbon. To reveal the generation and evolution processes of different functional groups, the adsorptions of N*, O*, NO*, NO2*, and O3* on different surface sites were examined, respectively. The most possible structures were optimized and are visualized in Figure .
Figure 1

Optimized structures of reactive species adsorption on a porous carbon surface.

Optimized structures of reactive species adsorption on a porous carbon surface. The structure PC–N is formed by n class="Chemical">N* adsorption. The formation of PC–N is highly exothermic, with an exothermicity of −804.1 kJ/mol. Table S1 indicates the bond populations of PC–N, and the bond population of C–N in PC–N is 0.562. Such a high positive value of bond population suggests the formation of a strong covalent bond. In addition, there is an obvious decrease in the C–C bond populations where the N atom is directly involved, indicating that the strength of these C–C bonds is weakened to a greater extent as a result of N adsorption. The structure PC–O is formed by O* adsorption on a n class="Chemical">carbon surface. The adsorption energy of O* in PC–O is found to be −946.0 kJ/mol, which means that O* adsorption is a highly exothermic process. As listed in Table S2, the C–O bond population of PC–O is 0.645, indicating a strong interaction of an O atom with a C atom. Two stable configurations are obtained by NO* adsorption on a surface, including PC–NO(a) and n class="Chemical">PC–NO(b). PC–NO(a) represents the NO* approaching the carbon surface in a N-down mode, where the N atom is chemically bonded with the edge C atom. The adsorption energy of NO* in PC–NO(a) is −263.1 kJ/mol, and C–N bond population is 0.101 (Table S3). PC–NO(b) means NO* adsorbing in a side-on mode, where the N and O atoms are bonded with the edge C atom by forming a five-membered ring. The adsorption energy of NO* in PC–NO(b) is −571.6 kJ/mol, which is obviously larger than that of PC–NO(a). The bond populations of C–N and C–O are 0.377 and 0.204, respectively. The higher bond population confirms a stronger interaction of NO* with C atoms in PC–NO(b) than that in PC–NO(a). The results imply that NO* is more likely to be adsorbed with the N–O bond parallel to the edge. The adsorption of NO2* yields the stable structures n class="Chemical">PC–NO2(a) and PCNO2(b). A six-membered ring is formed in PCNO2(a), where O and O′ atoms are bonded with C(9) and C(22), respectively. The bond population of C–O and C–O′ is 0.201 (Table S4), indicating a strong interaction of the O atom with the C site. However, both bond populations of N–O and N–O′ are only 0.079, which is obviously lower than the N–O bond population (0.246) in a gaseous NO2 molecule. This means that the N–O bond is weakened after NO2* adsorption. In PCNO2(b), NO2* adsorbs dissociatively on the surface, where the two fragments NO′ and O atom adsorb on C(9) and C(22), respectively. The bond populations of C–N and C–O are 0.288 and 0.590, respectively, which are higher than the C–O bond population in PCNO2(a), indicating a stronger interaction. The adsorption energy of NO2* in PCNO2(b) is −529.3 kJ/mol, which is obviously higher than that in PCNO2(a) (−394.9 kJ/mol). This implies that NO2* tends to adsorb on the surface in a dissociative manner. The stable configurations PCn class="Chemical">O3(a) and PCO3(b) are derived from O3* adsorption. In structure PCO3(a), a six-membered ring is formed between O3* and edge C atoms. As listed in Table S5, both the bond populations of C–O and C–O′ are 0.213, indicating the formation of strong C–O bonds. However, both the O–O″ and O′–O″ bond populations are only 0.042, which is smaller than the O–O bond population (0.097) in a gaseous O3 molecule. This suggests that the O–O bonds have been weakened after O3* adsorption. In PCO3(b), O3* dissociates into O–O″ and O′ atoms, and the two fragments adsorb on different C sites. Strong C–O bonds are formed in PCO3(b), as indicated by the positive bond populations. The adsorption energy of O3* in PCO3(b) is found to be −768.2 kJ/mol, which is higher than that in PCO3(a) (−643.4 kJ/mol). This means that O3* is likely to adsorb on the surface in a dissociative manner. The above calculation results suggest that the adsorption of energetic species on porous n class="Chemical">carbon is a highly exothermic process. Various functional groups, including C–N, C–O, and C–NO, are formed on the surface after the plasma treatment under O2 and NO, which is in consistence with the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses.[29] Therefore, the improvement in the surface chemistry of porous carbon after plasma treatment can be assigned to the coadsorption of different energetic species.

Effects of Different Functional Groups on Hg Adsorption

Hg Adsorption on Porous Carbon–N

Hg adsorption on n class="Chemical">N*-preabsorbed carbon was studied, and two stable structures were obtained, including N–Hg(a) and N–Hg(b), as shown in Figure . The adsorption energies of Hg in N–Hg(a) and N–Hg(b) are −21.6 and −21.1 kJ/mol, respectively, and both are close to the Hg adsorption energy in PCHg (Figure S2, −17.8 kJ/mol). In addition, the C–Hg bond populations in N–Hg(a) and N–Hg(b) are 0.211 and 0.212 (Table S1), respectively, and both are also close to the C–Hg bond population (0.211) in PCHg. The calculation results reveal that a N group has a neglectable effect on the Hg adsorption on porous carbon.[23,38] The Hg removal using carbon was investigated experimentally. They increased the nitrogen groups on the carbon surface by applying nonthermal plasma treatment under pure N2 and found that the nitrogen group had no obvious effect on the Hg removal ability of carbon. The calculation results are in agreement with the experimental phenomenon.
Figure 2

Hg adsorption on N-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg adsorption on N-preadsorbed porous n class="Chemical">carbon.

Hg Adsorption on Porous Carbon–O

The adsorption of Hg on O*-preabsorbed n class="Chemical">carbon was examined, and two stable configurations O–Hg(a) and O–Hg(b) were obtained, as illustrated in Figure . The Hg atom in these two structures is adsorbed on the edge C site rather than react directly with the O atom. The Hg adsorption energy is found to be −70.8 kJ/mol in O–Hg(a), and −57.9 kJ/mol in O–Hg(b). The Hg adsorption on PC–O is more exothermic than that on PC, confirming that the oxygen group can enhance the Hg0-removal ability of porous carbon. The bond populations are listed in Table S2. It can be seen that the C–Hg bond populations in O–Hg(a) and O–Hg(b) are 0.229 and 0.222, respectively, and both are higher than the C–Hg bond population (0.211) in PCHg. This means that the oxygen group enhances Hg adsorption by improving the interaction of Hg with a C atom.
Figure 3

Hg adsorption on O-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg adsorption on O-preadsorbed porous n class="Chemical">carbon. In previous experimental study,[30] the Hg-removal ability of n class="Chemical">oxygen-rich porous carbon was tested, and it was confirmed that an oxygen group could improve the Hg removal efficiency of porous carbon.[39] Various carbons were treated by air and nitric acid oxidation to increase the number of oxygen groups on the carbon surface. They found that increasing oxygen groups could improve the Hg-removal ability of carbon.[32] It was suggested experimentally that an oxygen group could enhance the electron-transfer process, and thus facilitating Hg adsorption on carbon. The calculation results are consistent with experimental conclusions.

Hg Adsorption on Porous Carbon–NO

The adsorption of Hg on a n class="Chemical">carbon surface with NO* was examined, and three stable intermediates NO–Hg(a), NO–Hg(b), and NO–Hg(c) were optimized, as shown in Figure , and the bond populations are indicated in Table S3. NO–Hg(a) represents the structure formed by Hg adsorption on PC–NO(a). The adsorption energy of Hg in NO–Hg(a) is only −2.8 kJ/mol, which is even lower than the Hg adsorption energy in PCHg (−17.8 kJ/mol). This means that when NO* is adsorbed on a surface in a N-down mode, it inhibits Hg adsorption. NO–Hg(b) and NO–Hg(c) means the Hg adsorption on PC–NO(b). The adsorption energies of Hg in NO–Hg(b) and NO–Hg(c) are −49.6 and −53.3 kJ/mol, respectively, which are more exothermic than Hg adsorption on PC. In addition, the C–Hg bond population in NO–Hg(b) and NO–Hg(c) is higher than that in PCHg. The results mean that the effect of NO* on Hg adsorption depends on the mode of NO* present on the surface. NO* can enhance Hg adsorption on the surface when it is adsorbed in a side-on mode, whereas it inhibits Hg adsorption when present in a N-down mode. Because NO* is more likely to adsorb in a side-on mode, NO* mainly plays a positive role in Hg adsorption. This is consistent with the experimental phenomenon reported previously that NO could improve the Hg-removal ability of a carbon sorbent.[40]
Figure 4

Hg adsorption on NO-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg adsorption on NO-preadsorbed porous n class="Chemical">carbon.

Hg Adsorption on Porous Carbon–NO2

Figure illustrates the adsorption of Hg on a n class="Chemical">NO2*-preadsorbed carbon surface, where three stable structures are obtained, including NO2Hg(a), NO2Hg(b), and NO2Hg(c). Among them, NO2Hg(a) and NO2Hg(b) are derived from Hg adsorbing on NO2(a), and their formations are found to be exothermic with exothermicities of −39.6 and −124.4 kJ/mol, respectively. The bond population of C–Hg in NO2Hg(a) is 0.227, and is 0.366 in NO2Hg(b), lager than the C–Hg bond population of 0.211 in PCHg. Particularly, Hg is oxidized into HgO in NO2Hg(b), in which the Hg atom is bonded with a surface C atom. The adsorbed NO2* decomposes into O and NO′, where the O atom is bonded with a Hg atom, and the remainder NO fragment bonds on C sites with a N–O bond parallel to the edge. The calculation result agrees well with the experimental one, suggesting that NO2* on carbon can react with Hg by forming HgO and NO.[41] NO2Hg(c) is obtained from Hg adsorbing on PCNO2(b), in which the Hg adsorption energy is −48.8 kJ/mol. It is clear that Hg adsorption on a NO2*-preadsorbed porous carbon surface is more exothermic than its adsorption on PC, confirming the positive effect of NO2* on improving the Hg-removal ability of porous carbon. A similar conclusion was reached based on an experimental study using HNO3-modified carbon to remove gaseous Hg.[42] The NO2 group could facilitate Hg adsorption on a carbon surface.[43]
Figure 5

Hg adsorption on NO2-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg adsorption on Nn class="Chemical">O2-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg Adsorption on Porous Carbon–O3

The structures derived from Hg adsorption on a n class="Chemical">O3*-preloaded carbon surface are presented in Figure , including O3Hg(a) and O3Hg(b). Among them, O3Hg(a) is originated from Hg adsorption on PCO3(a), and O3Hg(b) is calculated from Hg on PCO3(b). The adsorption energy of Hg is −143.8 kJ/mol in O3Hg(a) and −143.2 kJ/mol in O3Hg(b). Particularly, HgO is formed in O3Hg(b), indicating that O3* can oxidize Hg into HgO. The adsorption energy of Hg on carbon with O3* is higher than that of Hg on PC, suggesting the positive effect of O3* on Hg removal by porous carbon. In addition, Hg adsorption on O3*-preadsorbed carbon is more exothermic than that on the other structures, indicating that O3* is more effective in improving Hg removal.
Figure 6

Hg adsorption on O3-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg adsorption on n class="Chemical">O3-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Adsorption Pathway of Hg on Porous Carbon with Functional Groups

The calculation results indicate that the energetic species generated by plasma can be adsorbed on porous n class="Chemical">carbon with the formation of various surface functional groups. The formation processes of these groups are highly exothermic, and the exothermicities of these groups are significantly higher than the Hg adsorption. This means that the adsorption of energetic species is more stable than Hg. The energetic species will preferentially adsorb on carbon to form functional groups, which then affects the following Hg adsorption. As shown in Figure S4, the Mulliken charge of Hg in PCHg is lower than that in the other structures, indicating an enhancement in charge transfer. The roles of different groups in Hg adsorption are closely related to their types. O*, NO*, NO2*, and O3* can generate active groups to enhance Hg adsorption, whereas N has no obvious effect on Hg removal. To clarify the contribution of different groups in improving n class="Chemical">Hg adsorption on porous carbon, the Hg-removal abilities of PC, O2PC, NO–PC, and O2/NO–PC were investigated, as shown in Figure . The average Hg removal efficiency of PC during 20 min test is only 27.6%, indicating a weak Hg-removal ability. After treated by the plasma under O2, the average Hg-removal efficiency of O2PC increases to 76.2%, verifying the positive effect of the C–O group on Hg adsorption. The average Hg removal efficiency of NO–PC is found to be 83.2%, demonstrating the positive effect of C–NO on Hg adsorption. In addition, the average Hg removal efficiency of O2/NO–PC is 98.2%, which is even higher than that of O2PC and NO–PC. This means that the excellent Hg-removal performance of O2/NO–PC is owing to the coeffects of all active functional groups.
Figure 7

Hg removal efficiency of different porous carbons.

Hg removal efficiency of difn class="Chemical">ferent porous carbons. In addition, the mercury temperature-programmed desorption (n class="Chemical">Hg-TPD) method was applied to verify the forms of mercury on porous carbon. The Hg-preadsorbed raw PC and O2/NO–PC were used for the desorption test, as shown in Figure . PC displays one Hg desorption peak at around 190 °C, which is assigned to the Hg directly adsorbed on carbon sites.[44,45] In contrast, O2/NO–PC shows two distinguished Hg desorption peaks at 220 and 310 °C, respectively, demonstrating that there are two forms of mercury on the O2/NO–PC surface. The first peak at 220 °C is contributed to Hg bonded with carbon sites, which occurs at a higher temperature than that of raw PC, confirming that the active functional groups can enhance the interaction of Hg with a C atom. The second peak at 310 °C is assigned to HgO,[44] which verifies that part of functional groups can oxidize Hg into HgO.
Figure 8

Hg-TPD profile of Hg-preadsorbed porous carbon.

Hg-TPD profile of n class="Chemical">Hg-preadsorbed porous carbon. Based on the above theoretical and experimental investigations, the pathways for Hg adsorption on porous n class="Chemical">carbon treated by plasma under O2 and NO can be obtained, as shown in Figure . On the one hand, the active functional groups do not react directly with Hg but can enhance the charge transfer between Hg and a surface C atom, thereby improving Hg adsorption on the neighboring C site. On the other hand, the preadsorbed NO2* and O3* can react directly with a Hg atom by forming HgO via the Eley–Rideal (ER) mechanism.
Figure 9

Illustrative profile of the proposed mechanism of Hg on different group surfaces.

Illustrative profile of the proposed mechanism of Hg on difn class="Chemical">ferent group surfaces.

Conclusions

In this study, the generation processes of surface functional groups on porous carbon during plasma treatment under n class="Chemical">O2 and NO were investigated, and the detailed roles of different groups in Hg adsorption were clarified. The surface functional groups are preferentially generated and then affect the following Hg adsorption. The effects of surface groups on Hg adsorption are closely related to their origin. The groups derived from O*, NO*, NO2*, and O3* adsorption can enhance Hg adsorption on a carbon surface, whereas the group formed by N adsorption has a neglectable effect on Hg adsorption. There are two pathways for functional groups enhancing Hg adsorption. One is that the active groups can improve Hg adsorption by enhancing the interaction of Hg with a surface carbon atom, and the other is that the preadsorbed NO2* and O3* can directly oxidize Hg into HgO via the Eley–Rideal mechanism. The high Hg-removal efficiency of the O2-/NO-codoped porous carbon is assigned to the cocontribution of all active functional groups. The Hg-TPD method confirms that there are two forms of mercury present on a porous carbon surface, including Hg adsorbed on carbon sites and HgO adsorbed on the surface.

Computational and Experimental Methods

Computational Details

In this study, the porous carbon acts as a reactant to capture the energetic species generated during plasma treatment and a gaseous n class="Chemical">Hg atom. It is thus important to choose a reasonable initial model for representing the structure of porous carbon. It is generally agreed that the macrostructure of carbon, including porous carbon, is mainly composed of polycyclic aromatic clusters of different sizes.[46,47] Solid-state 13C NMR experiment confirms the chemical structure of carbon containing three to seven benzene rings.[48] Therefore, a seven benzene ring cluster model was applied to simulate the structure of porous carbon (PC), as shown in Figure S1. The edge unsaturated carbon atoms represent the main active sites on the carbon surface and the carbon atoms on the other sides are saturated by H atoms. Similar cluster models have been widely applied to represent the carbon structure for gaseous pollutant adsorption.[49,50] Gaussian 16 software package was applied in this work.[51] Full geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were conducted for all of the structures using the B3PW91 functional. The 6-31G(d) basis set was employed for n class="Chemical">hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms. The RCEP60VDZ basis set, with relativistic effective core potential (ECP), was used for a Hg atom, where the inner electrons were kept in the core. After the geometry optimizations and frequency calculations, the single-point energy calculations were performed using optimized structures by the def2-TZVP basis set, which was aimed to improve the accuracy of calculation results. To describe the weak interaction force of Hg adsorption, the density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D3) was adopted. Each structure was optimized at different multiplicities and the lowest energy complex was determined as a ground state. The method used to obtain adsorption energy is described in detail in the Supporting Information. The Mulliken method was adopted to investigate the charge-transfer process.

Experimental Justifications

To verify the calculation results, the n class="Chemical">Hg-removal efficiencies of different porous carbons were tested, including raw PC, PC treated by plasma under 4% O2 (O2PC), PC treated by plasma under 200 ppm NO (NO–PC), and PC treated by plasma under 4% O2 and 200 ppm NO (O2/NO–PC). The mercury temperature-programmed desorption (Hg-TPD) method was used to investigate the forms of mercury present on a porous carbon surface. The samples were heated under pure N2 at 10 °C/min from 20 to 600 °C. The gas flow rate was kept at 1.0 L/min. The experimental setup is showed in Figure S3. The experiments are described in detail in the Supporting Information.
  21 in total

1.  Mechanistic studies of mercury adsorption and oxidation by oxygen over spinel-type MnFe2O4.

Authors:  Yingju Yang; Jing Liu; Bingkai Zhang; Feng Liu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Development of low-concentration mercury adsorbents from biohydrogen-generation agricultural residues using sulfur impregnation.

Authors:  Hsing-Chengi Hsi; Cheng-Yen Tsai; Tien-Ho Kuo; Cheng-Sheng Chiang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Bromination of petroleum coke for elemental mercury capture.

Authors:  Yi Xiao; Deepak Pudasainee; Rajender Gupta; Zhenghe Xu; Yongfa Diao
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Enhanced capture of elemental mercury by bamboo-based sorbents.

Authors:  Zengqiang Tan; Jun Xiang; Sheng Su; Hancai Zeng; Changsong Zhou; Lushi Sun; Song Hu; Jianrong Qiu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Development of O2 and NO Co-Doped Porous Carbon as a High-Capacity Mercury Sorbent.

Authors:  Fenghua Shen; Jing Liu; Dawei Wu; Yuchen Dong; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control.

Authors:  John W Graydon; Xinzhi Zhang; Donald W Kirk; Charles Q Jia
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Using the Novel Method of Nonthermal Plasma To Add Cl Active Sites on Activated Carbon for Removal of Mercury from Flue Gas.

Authors:  Bi Zhang; Xiaobo Zeng; Ping Xu; Juan Chen; Yang Xu; Guangqian Luo; Minghou Xu; Hong Yao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Impact of sulfur oxides on mercury capture by activated carbon.

Authors:  Albert A Presto; Evan J Granite
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Application of biochars in the remediation of chromium contamination: Fabrication, mechanisms, and interfering species.

Authors:  Chujing Zheng; Zhihui Yang; Mengying Si; Feng Zhu; Weichun Yang; Feiping Zhao; Yan Shi
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 10.588

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of Physical-Chemical Evolution of High-Sulfur Petroleum Coke on Hg0 Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas and Exploration of Its Micro-Scale Mechanism.

Authors:  Jie Jiang; Yongfa Diao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.