Hengjie Tang1, Tetsuo Kishi1, Tetsuji Yano1. 1. Department of Material Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Meguro-ku 145-0065, Japan.
Abstract
Microresonators show great potential as interlayer routing solutions for multilayered three-dimensional (3D) photonic communication networks. New techniques are needed for the convenient and in situ manipulation and immobilization of glass microspheres into functional structures. Herein, near-infrared (NIR) and ultraviolet (UV) lasers were used as optical tweezers to precisely arrange silica microspheres and UV-initiated immobilization in a 3D space. The NIR laser was used to trap targeted microspheres, and the UV laser was focused to immobilize the trapped microspheres in 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MOPS) in ∼6 s. Optical force spectroscopy was performed using the optical tweezers to measure individual bond strength. Next, functional triangular pedestals were designed to flexibly control the gap space for vertical router applications in 3D photonic networks. Thus, the designed UV-NIR dual-beam optical tweezer system can be used to assemble arbitrary functional 3D structures, making it a valuable tool for microfabrication, photonics, and optical communication applications.
Microresonators show great potential as interlayer routing solutions for multilayered three-dimensional (3D) photonic communication networks. New techniques are needed for the convenient and in situ manipulation and immobilization of glass microspheres into functional structures. Herein, near-infrared (NIR) and ultraviolet (UV) lasers were used as optical tweezers to precisely arrange silica microspheres and UV-initiated immobilization in a 3D space. The NIR laser was used to trap targeted microspheres, and the UV laser was focused to immobilize the trapped microspheres in 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MOPS) in ∼6 s. Optical force spectroscopy was performed using the optical tweezers to measure individual bond strength. Next, functional triangular pedestals were designed to flexibly control the gap space for vertical router applications in 3D photonic networks. Thus, the designed UV-NIR dual-beam optical tweezer system can be used to assemble arbitrary functional 3D structures, making it a valuable tool for microfabrication, photonics, and optical communication applications.
Over the last several
decades, photonic communication networks
have emerged as the most promising approach to massively expand the
bandwidth and reduce power consumption[1−4] relative to conventional metal-based electrical
communication networks.[5−7] However, the increasing number of waveguide crossings
causes optical loss and limits the scalability of the existing in-plane
networks.[8−10] To resolve this issue, multilayered three-dimensional
(3D) networks can provide efficient topologies and increase the density
of integrated functional elements, which in conjunction can reduce
energy requirements.[11−14]Various components are integrated in a 3D photonic communication
network, for example, modulators,[15,16] switches,[17,18] and filters.[19,20] The vertical router needed to
establish interlayer links between stacked layers is the key component
therein. Many solutions have been proposed for this router, such as
microring vertical couplers,[21−23] vertical coupling waveguides,[24,25] and through-silicon photonic vias.[26] However,
strict requirements for the vertical coupling distance and fabrication
difficulties limit the applicability of these solutions. Recently
developed chemical synthesis techniques have enabled the production
of high-quality glass microspheres with controlled sizes, shapes,
compositions, and other unique properties.[27−30] Functional devices constructed
with glass microspheres find broad applications for photonics as ideal
microresonator components with either active or passive compositions,[31−35] introducing new possibilities for vertical routers in 3D photonic
networks.The coupling behavior and quality factor of a microresonator
integrated
in a photonic network are precisely determined by the gap space between
spheres and waveguides.[36] However, recent
methods of coupling microspheres and controlling the gap are limited
in terms of flexibility by predeposited Teflon films or the fiber
taper,[36,37] which are incompatible with microfabrication
requirements, particularly in 3D optical communication networks. New
magnetic control methods have been reported,[38] but external fields and complex structures limit 3D-integrated applications.
A new triangular pedestal structure (Figure ) proposed herein can simply and flexibly
control the gap to support microresonators on waveguides. The pedestal
comprises several glass microspheres as vertices (named pedestal microspheres
thereafter), and the structure can be flexibly adjusted to obtain
the desired gap spaces.
Figure 1
Schematic illustrations of (a) the triangular
pedestal structure
to control the gap space h and (b) an interlayer
router model using microresonators and pedestals in a multilayered
3D photonic network. PM, pedestal microspheres; MR, microresonator.
Schematic illustrations of (a) the triangular
pedestal structure
to control the gap space h and (b) an interlayer
router model using microresonators and pedestals in a multilayered
3D photonic network. PM, pedestal microspheres; MR, microresonator.Individual glass microspheres are assembled into
a functional component
in two steps: arrangement into the desired configuration in the first
step and immobilization in the second step. Numerous techniques have
been reported to perform each step separately.[39−47] However, simultaneously executing both steps remains challenging
because microspheres generally become disorganized when the external
field is removed prior to immobilization.[48,49] Efforts have been made to effectively combine the assembly and immobilization
steps. Cascading microresonators on glass substrates coated with epoxy
resin have also been reported, but immobilization in this case was
uncontrollable once the microspheres touched the coated substrates.[50] Terray et al. used a laser to initiate polymerization
in aqueous solution and created structures in situ; however, these
structures were limited to a linear configuration along the trapping
beam, which is particularly unsuitable for 3D construction.[51] Misawa et al. provided an in situ common path
strategy, but the vinyl monomer solution still risked uncontrolled
polymerization by scattered light.[52,53] UV-initiated
click chemistry, an efficient alternative for in situ immobilization,
is highly controllable and compatible with many manipulation techniques.[54,55] However, light-emitting diode illumination, commonly used to initiate
click reactions, has poor targeting precision and long reaction times,
rendering these methods impractical for industrial fabrication.[56−58] Thus, there remains a need for an efficient, convenient method for
immobilizing targeted glass microspheres in situ following assembly.Herein, a convenient UV–NIR dual-beam optical tweezer system
was developed to precisely arrange glass microspheres and achieve
accurate UV-initiated immobilization in 3D space within seconds. An
NIR laser was used as a trapping beam for manipulation, and a 325
nm UV laser was trained on the same focal area to initiate immobilization.
The glass microspheres and substrates were coated with a monolayer
of methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MOPS) and bonded to each other
via polymerization between two MOPS molecules. The UV immobilization
parameters were quantitatively evaluated, including the irradiation
time and reagent concentration. Optical force spectroscopy was performed
using the optical tweezers to directly measure the bonding strength
of MOPS chains at different MOPS concentrations. A flexible pedestal
structure was designed and assembled to support vertical routers in
multilayered photonics networks.
Results
Manipulation Using the NIR Optical Tweezers
We first
analyzed the lateral force of the NIR optical tweezers.
Silica microspheres were trapped between the cover and slide glass
in ethanol and moved laterally using the optical tweezers to indirectly
determine the lateral force. The resisting force of a viscous fluid
(Fres) surrounding a moving microsphere
is related to its velocity according to Stokes’ law (eq ):where η is the viscosity of the liquid,
here ethanol; r is the radius of the microsphere;
and υ is the velocity of the microsphere relative to the surrounding
liquid. The lateral force of the optical tweezers is equal to the
resisting force at the critical escape velocity. Notably, the surface
viscosity would vary with the bulk value, considering the surface
modification and particle sizes. We used a sedimentation test in pure
ethanol to confirm that the surface viscosity of unprocessed silica
microspheres used therein showed no significant deviation (<0.3%)
from the bulk value, and we therefore ignored its influence during
subsequent calculations.The lateral force (FOT) of the optical tweezers is plotted as a function of
laser power (measured after the objective lens (OBJ)), as shown in Figure a. Up to 16 pN of
force could be applied to the microspheres at a laser power of 30
mW. The optical tweezers could also be evaluated using the force coefficient
(Q), which was calculated using eq .[59]where n1 is the
refractive index of the medium, P is the laser power,
and c is the speed of light. The refractive index
of ethanol, measured using an Abbe Refractometer (ATAGO), was 1.3610
(D line, 23 °C). Considering the solute concentration of the
3 wt % photoinitiator IRGACURE 184, the measured refractive index
of the solution was 1.3650, and the influence on force was less than
0.32%; it is therefore ignored hereafter. After fitting the curve
in Figure a, the maximum
value of Q was found to be 0.1279. This implies that
over 12% of the laser power was transferred and used to trap the target
microsphere when the beam passed through it. Increasing the laser
power would obviously increase the optical tweezer force, but the
effects of heating, such as the generation of vortices in the heated
liquid, should be considered.
Figure 2
(a) Lateral force (pN) of the optical tweezers
(OT) as a function
of laser power (mW) (measured after the OBJ). The red line is the
fitted curve. (b) Images showing the sequence in which a single silica
microsphere was moved using the optical tweezer system. The red lines
represent the lateral movement, and the black arrows represent the
axial lift.
(a) Lateral force (pN) of the optical tweezers
(OT) as a function
of laser power (mW) (measured after the OBJ). The red line is the
fitted curve. (b) Images showing the sequence in which a single silica
microsphere was moved using the optical tweezer system. The red lines
represent the lateral movement, and the black arrows represent the
axial lift.We separately characterized manipulation
in 3D space using the
optical tweezers. One silica microsphere was trapped and moved along
a predetermined path (Figure b). The coordinates of each node along the path were used
as inputs for the control software. The piezo stage and the OBJ actuator
were moved accordingly to manipulate the microsphere. The target microsphere
was dragged 10 μm laterally and lifted 5 μm axially in
0.1 μm steps. The trapped microsphere was in focus, whereas
the surrounding microspheres were out of focus. The speed of the microspheres
could be precisely controlled below the critical escape velocity by
adjusting the step size. However, the step size should not exceed
the radius of the microsphere to avoid the risk of derailment. We
were able to flexibly manipulate the microspheres in the 3D space
and move them to any user-defined position, thus confirming that the
developed UV–NIR dual-beam system can be used to generate complex
3D structures.
UV Immobilization
Once the microspheres
were positioned using the optical tweezers, they were immobilized
by the polymerization of MOPS chains formed during a UV-induced click
reaction. MOPS is commercially available and widely used to fabricate
hybrid sol–gel films for waveguides,[60,61] although few reports exist on the use of MOPS for particle immobilization.
This rarity might be due in part to the long UV irradiation time required.[56−58] We focused the UV laser and optimized the MOPS concentration to
shorten this irradiation time to a period of a few seconds; this shortening
is important and efficient for practical applications such as industry
fabrication.MOPS was first hydrolyzed in an acidic environment,
following which it could participate in a condensation reaction with
the hydroxyl groups on the glass microspheres and slides. An MOPS
monolayer coated the surface of each microsphere and the slide through
the formation of siloxane (Si—O—Si) bonds (Figure ). To control the
polymerization reaction, we used a focused 325 nm UV laser as an external
trigger for the photoinitiator. Photoinitiation induced polymerization
bond formation between pairs of MOPS chains, linking the microspheres
to the glass substrate or to other microspheres, wherever the UV laser
was focused. The reaction proceeded very quickly under the focused
UV beam, ensuring that the operation of the optical tweezers would
not be affected by immobilization, thus realizing an assembly line.
Another benefit of focusing the UV laser was that immobilization exclusively
occurred in targeted areas, resulting in excellent spatial precision.
Figure 3
Schematic
illustration of UV-initiated immobilization between the
surfaces of microspheres and substrates coated with MOPS monolayers.
The decomposition of the photoinitiator IRGACURE 184 under UV light
initiated the bonding of adjacent MOPS chains. Inset: bonding process
between MOPS chains.
Schematic
illustration of UV-initiated immobilization between the
surfaces of microspheres and substrates coated with MOPS monolayers.
The decomposition of the photoinitiator IRGACURE 184 under UV light
initiated the bonding of adjacent MOPS chains. Inset: bonding process
between MOPS chains.The effect of MOPS concentration
on UV immobilization was also
investigated to optimize our protocol. The UV exposure times required
to immobilize microspheres coated in MOPS at concentrations of 0.02–0.5
wt % are plotted, as shown in Figure a. Microspheres were observed in three different states
following UV exposure (Figure b). Microspheres in the free state indicated that UV exposure
was insufficient, and the trapped microspheres could still be moved
using the optical tweezers. In the bound state, the microspheres were
linked to the slide by some quantity of MOPS chains and could not
be moved by applying a weak force (normally less than 5 pN). However,
they could be disturbed or even dragged away if the optical tweezer
force became stronger. More MOPS chains were found bonded to microspheres
in the fixed state, and the microspheres could no longer be moved.
We found that higher MOPS concentrations reduced the UV exposure time
needed to efficiently immobilize individual microspheres, but they
were saturated with MOPS at higher concentrations. This indicated
that UV-induced immobilization was influenced by the density of the
MOPS layer, which was governed by the concentration of the MOPS solution
used to coat the microspheres and slides. When the MOPS coating on
the surface was sparse, the likelihood of bonds forming between MOPS
chains was lower. Coating with a 0.02 wt % MOPS solution resulted
in longer and highly variable required UV exposure times. However,
if the MOPS coating was too dense, the reaction rates at the center
and edges of the irradiated area differed. This was due to the uneven
distribution of the photoinitiator when MOPS reached saturation. The
optimal MOPS concentration for coating the glass microspheres and
slides was found to be 0.1 wt %. Immobilization was achieved within
6 s under a focused UV laser; this duration was nearly 2 orders of
magnitude less than typical MOPS illumination times of several minutes
or even hours.[61]
Figure 4
(a) Relationship between
UV exposure time and MOPS concentration
during the UV immobilization process. The exposure time needed to
obtain the three immobilization states was statistically measured
under NIR light at a power of 22 mW. X symbols show the average value
for each condition, whereas the orange solid line shows the exposure
time trend across MOPS concentration for all bonded states pooled.
(b) Schematic illustration of microspheres in three immobilization
states: the free state, in which a few MOPS chains are bonded; the
bound state, in which a certain proportion of chains are bonded; and
the fixed state, in which even more chains are bonded.
(a) Relationship between
UV exposure time and MOPS concentration
during the UV immobilization process. The exposure time needed to
obtain the three immobilization states was statistically measured
under NIR light at a power of 22 mW. X symbols show the average value
for each condition, whereas the orange solid line shows the exposure
time trend across MOPS concentration for all bonded states pooled.
(b) Schematic illustration of microspheres in three immobilization
states: the free state, in which a few MOPS chains are bonded; the
bound state, in which a certain proportion of chains are bonded; and
the fixed state, in which even more chains are bonded.We first attempt to manipulate and immobilize individual
silica
microspheres using our system as a proof-of-concept experiment. The
optical microscope images of the two microspheres, which are moved
to target positions and immobilized, are shown in Figure . The power of the optical
tweezers was ∼22 mW. This corresponded to ∼12 pN of
the optical tweezer force, which was sufficient to move the 5 μm
microspheres. The UV laser was switched on and focused on the trapped
microspheres to immobilize them. The power density behind the UV laser
outlet was ∼2.7 μW/cm2. Manipulation and immobilization
of the selected microspheres had no obvious impact on the surrounding
microspheres, which was attributed to the targeting precision of the
focused beam.
Figure 5
(a,c) Ex ante and (b,d) ex post optical microscope images showing the processes of manipulating
two silica microspheres to target positions. The dashed circles and
arrows represent the target microspheres and their motion path. The
red X symbols in (a,b) indicate microspheres near the target positions,
which serve as reference points.
(a,c) Ex ante and (b,d) ex post optical microscope images showing the processes of manipulating
two silica microspheres to target positions. The dashed circles and
arrows represent the target microspheres and their motion path. The
red X symbols in (a,b) indicate microspheres near the target positions,
which serve as reference points.
Discussion
Bonding Strength
The optical tweezing
force we applied was in the piconewton range, which enabled the evaluation
of the MOPS chains’ bonding strength using the optical tweezers
in situ. The bonding force opposing the lateral force of the optical
tweezers can be described using the simple lever model illustrated
in Figure a, which
shows a microsphere linked to a substrate by a pair of MOPS chains.
The position of the fulcrum depends on where the MOPS bonds to the
microsphere, until the chains break because of the optical tweezers.
The bonding force (fbond) can be derived
from the optical tweezer lateral force (FOT) using eq .where F⊥ is the perpendicular
component of FOT; L1 and L2 are the lengths of the
lever arms of the optical tweezers and bonding
force, respectively; θ is the angle between the fulcrum and
the normal axis; and yF is the ordinate
of the fulcrum, which is equal to the distance between the microsphere
surface and the substrate. This exact distance depends on the area
over which immobilization occurs, which primarily depends on the size
of the UV focal area and the length of the bonded MOPS chains. yF can be expressed using eq .where FWHMUV is the full width
at half-maximum of the UV focal profile, CLbonding is the
length of the bonded MOPS chains, and k is the structural
folding factor of the MOPS molecule. The UV focal profile (Ifocal) can be calculated using the Fraunhofer
diffraction expression in eq .where
PSF is the point spread
function of the OBJ pupil. The length of the MOPS chains CLbonding is determined from the sum of each chemical bond length, considering
the bond angle.[62] The length of a single
MOPS molecule, from the carbon participating in the photopolymerization
reaction (asterisked) at one end —C*(CH3)=CH2 to the oxygen (asterisked) linked to surfaces at the other
end —Si—O*—Si (shown in the inset of Figure ), was calculated
as 1.042 nm. The CLbonding, comprising two bonded MOPS
molecules, was double the length of a single MOPS molecule plus one
C—C bond, resulting in a total length of 2.210 nm. Chains are
normally folded; hence, k should be less than 1.
For example, k was 0.5 where the MOPS chains overlapped.
When the microsphere is pulled by the optical tweezers, the chains
stretch and k approaches 1.
Figure 6
(a) Schematic illustration
of the lever model, in which the bonding
force fbond opposes the lateral force FOT of the optical tweezers. L1 and L2 are the lengths of
the lever arms of FOT and the bonding
force, respectively; θ is the angle between the fulcrum and
the normal axis; F⊥ is the perpendicular
component of FOT; and P represents the fulcrum point. (b) Schematic illustration of the
bond breakage process from the stable state to the disturbed state
until breakage occurs with increasing FOT. The outermost, tightest bonded chain (green) would break first
when pulled by the optical tweezers before other chains broke one
by one. The orange dashed circles represent the original position
of the microsphere when stable. (c) Bonding strength, as evaluated
with increasing optical tweezer force under various MOPS concentrations:
0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 wt %.
(a) Schematic illustration
of the lever model, in which the bonding
force fbond opposes the lateral force FOT of the optical tweezers. L1 and L2 are the lengths of
the lever arms of FOT and the bonding
force, respectively; θ is the angle between the fulcrum and
the normal axis; F⊥ is the perpendicular
component of FOT; and P represents the fulcrum point. (b) Schematic illustration of the
bond breakage process from the stable state to the disturbed state
until breakage occurs with increasing FOT. The outermost, tightest bonded chain (green) would break first
when pulled by the optical tweezers before other chains broke one
by one. The orange dashed circles represent the original position
of the microsphere when stable. (c) Bonding strength, as evaluated
with increasing optical tweezer force under various MOPS concentrations:
0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 wt %.The microspheres in the bound state shown in Figure b could be dragged away when FOT was sufficiently high. By carefully controlling the
UV exposure time, we prepared several microspheres in the bound state,
while varying FOT by adjusting the NIR
laser power. The microspheres were stable when weak FOT was applied. Then, they were disturbed as the FOT was increased and could be dragged away from
the substrate when FOT exceeded the bonding
force and broke the chains (Figure b). The bonding strength of a single chain could be
evaluated at the point of bond breakage (FOT exceeding critical value) because the tightest bonded chain would
break first when pulled by the optical tweezers before other chains
broke one by one. The measured magnitudes of FOT required to break bonds between the substrates and microspheres
coated at different MOPS concentrations are shown in Figure c. Chains broke when FOT exceeded 4–6 pN, and no significant
relationship existed between FOT and the
MOPS concentration. The bonding force could then be calculated for
a single chain using eq . The value of fbond was 4.5 nN, which
exactly matched the mechanical strength of covalent bonds in MOPS.[63,64] The Si—C bonds were considered more likely to break first,
as they were the weakest bonds in the MOPS chains.[65]
Structural Assembly and
Accuracy
To confirm that the UV–NIR dual-beam optical
tweezer system
can be used as a micromanufacturing tool for the precise construction
of arbitrary functional structures, evaluating its structural assembly
performance and accuracy was necessary. We organized microspheres
into simple triangles, cross patterns, and letter “F”
shapes by manipulating them to the target positions and immobilizing
them individually (Figure ).
Figure 7
Optical images of microspheres manipulated into various patterns:
(a) a letter “F” shape, (b) a cross, and (c) a triangle.
(d) Pedestal structure comprising three pedestal microspheres arranged
in an equilateral triangle. L is the length of each
side, G is the center point, and d is the distance between the center and each vertex. (e) Distribution
of the positional error determined by measuring all nine sides of
the three triangles. The SD (0.14 μm) is indicated by blue shading.
(f) Schematic illustration showing the adjustment of gap space h in a functional pedestal structure. Rres and r represent the radii of microresonators
and pedestal microspheres, respectively, and d is
the distance between the center and each vertex.
Optical images of microspheres manipulated into various patterns:
(a) a letter “F” shape, (b) a cross, and (c) a triangle.
(d) Pedestal structure comprising three pedestal microspheres arranged
in an equilateral triangle. L is the length of each
side, G is the center point, and d is the distance between the center and each vertex. (e) Distribution
of the positional error determined by measuring all nine sides of
the three triangles. The SD (0.14 μm) is indicated by blue shading.
(f) Schematic illustration showing the adjustment of gap space h in a functional pedestal structure. Rres and r represent the radii of microresonators
and pedestal microspheres, respectively, and d is
the distance between the center and each vertex.The coupling behavior of a microresonator integrated with an optical
waveguide in a photonic network is the most important design parameter
as a determinant of the quality factor, stored energy, and bandwidth.
Coupling behavior entirely depends on the gap space between the spheres
and the waveguide; hence, flexible control over device morphology
during fabrication is imperative.[36] We
designed a functional pedestal structure (Figure d) as part of a flexible vertical router
for interlayer communication in multilayered 3D photonic networks.
The pedestal structure comprised three pedestal microspheres, which
were organized into an equilateral triangle to support a large microresonator
(Figure a). By properly
adjusting the locations of the three vertices, the gap space between
the resonator and the waveguide (h) could be precisely
controlled using eq .where Rres and r are the radii of the microresonator
and pedestal microspheres
at the vertices, respectively, and d is the distance
between each vertex and the center of the triangle. In Table , we list some examples with
various resonators and pedestal microsphere size combinations to design
pedestals for three representative communication wavelengths (h was set equal to one-quarter of the applicable wavelength).[66]
Table 1
Pedestal Design Parameters
for Three
Representative Communication Wavelengths
λ/μm
h
r
Rres
d
1.55
0.39
5.0
100.0
43.9
1.55
0.39
5.0
50.0
31.1
1.30
0.33
2.0
100.0
27.1
1.30
0.33
2.0
50.0
19.2
0.85
0.21
1.0
100.0
18.9
0.85
0.21
1.0
50.0
13.4
To assess accuracy, we arranged three microspheres
to predetermined
coordinates to form each pedestal structure and immobilized them.
We repeated the process thrice and captured optical images to measure
all nine sides of the pedestals. The positional error was calculated
for each side, which was defined as the difference between the theoretical
and measured lengths. The measured lengths of all nine sides were
remarkably close to their expected values with a standard deviation
(SD) of 0.14 μm (Figure e). The SD was less than 1/30th of the silica microsphere
diameter, and the corresponding error in h in the
first line of Table was just 60 nm according to eq . The accurate assembly of structures at the submicron level
confirmed that the optical tweezer system can be used for precise
microdevice fabrication.
Conclusions
A custom
UV–NIR dual-beam system was developed for the manipulation
and assembly of glass microspheres into compact functional structures
by combining optical tweezers with a UV immobilization strategy. Up
to 16 pN of the optical tweezer lateral force could be applied to
the microspheres at laser powers below 30 mW, and the force coefficient
(Q) exceeded 0.12. The effect of the MOPS concentration
used to coat the glass microspheres and substrates was evaluated,
and an MOPS concentration of 0.1 wt % afforded rapid and reliable
UV-induced immobilization. After optimizing the MOPS coating process
and focusing the UV beam, UV-induced immobilization could be achieved
within 6 s. This irradiation time was shorter than typical irradiation
times by nearly 2 orders of magnitude. The bonding strength of individual
MOPS chains was quantified via optical force spectroscopy using the
optical tweezers. Each individual MOPS chain could supply 4–6
pN bonding force for immobilization. The system was used to organize
glass microspheres into various structures with submicron accuracy.
We constructed a pedestal structure as a component of a vertical coupler.
The distance between the microresonator and waveguide could be controlled
to flexibly modulate the coupling behavior and the quality factor
for interlayer communication in 3D photonic networks.Additional
research is needed to increase the flexibility of the
manipulation and improve control over particle orientation, particularly
the orientations of irregular particles. The modulation of the trapping
beam wave front could induce vortex torque in the focal area.[67,68] Although our system enabled the manipulation of individual microspheres,
throughput was relatively low, which can constitute a barrier against
use in integrated manufacturing applications. However, using a galvanometer
or a programmatically controlled spatial light modulator[69−71] would enable parallel implementation of trapping and immobilization.
We thus achieved the dynamic assembly of glass microspheres into 3D
functional components for microdevices, providing our developed optical
tweezer system to be a noninvasive and accurate tool for various micromanufacturing
and 3D photonic network applications in optical communication.
Materials and Methods
System Configuration
Our customized
system was built based on an inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan), as
shown in Figure .
A 3900S tunable, continuous-wave (CW) Ti:sapphire NIR laser (Spectra-Physics,
USA) served as the trapping beam. A half-wave plate (HWP), a polarized
beam splitter (PBS), and an alternative neutral density filter were
used to modulate laser power. A low-pass dichroic mirror (DM1) directed
the expanded beam to a 100× NIR OBJ (NA 1.30, Nikon) to form
an optical gradient for trapping. The transmitted light was directed
to a camera for imaging. The beam from an IK5551R-F 325 nm UV laser
(Kimmon Koha, Japan) was combined with the illuminator light using
a high-pass dichroic mirror (DM2) and a 20× UV OBJ (Thorlabs,
USA). The reflected UV beam and trapping beam were confocal in the
sample plane. The sample was placed on an XY piezo stage (PI, Germany)
with an OBJ actuator coupled to the NIR OBJ to move the targets within
a 100 × 100 × 80 μm3 space. The path and
speed of movement could be preset and monitored in our customized
software programmed in LabVIEW (National Instruments, USA).
Figure 8
Schematic of
the UV–NIR dual-beam optical tweezer system.
The NIR beam was modulated by an HWP with a PBS and was directed to
the NIR OBJ by a dichroic mirror (DM1). The UV beam was directed to
the UV OBJ by another dichroic mirror (DM2). The transmitted light
was imaged by a CCD camera through a tube lens (TL) and a filter.
Inset: schematic illustration of the structure assembly in the sample
plane.
Schematic of
the UV–NIR dual-beam optical tweezer system.
The NIR beam was modulated by an HWP with a PBS and was directed to
the NIR OBJ by a dichroic mirror (DM1). The UV beam was directed to
the UV OBJ by another dichroic mirror (DM2). The transmitted light
was imaged by a CCD camera through a tube lens (TL) and a filter.
Inset: schematic illustration of the structure assembly in the sample
plane.
Preparation
of the Silica Microspheres and
Slides
Silica microspheres (5 μm, Sekisui Chemical,
Japan) and 25 × 25 × 0.5 mm silica slides (Daico MFG, Japan)
were coated with MOPS (Shin-Etsu, Japan) monolayers via siloxane (Si—O—Si)
bond formation (Scheme ). The silica slides and microspheres were placed in boiling deionized
(DI) water to activate the hydroxyl groups on their surfaces. They
were then treated for 2 h in a solution containing MOPS in one of
a set of concentrations (0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 wt %) and 5
wt % HCl in ethanol, which had been stirred for 2 h in advance. The
coated slides were then washed with ethanol and dried under nitrogen.
The coated microspheres were washed and centrifuged twice in ethanol
to remove excess MOPS and were subsequently collected and suspended
in ethanol. The mixtures were ultrasonicated for 10 min for dispersion.
Prior to the placement on the XY piezo stage, 3 wt % IRGACURE 184
(1-hydroxycyclohexyl-phenylketone, BASF, Japan) was added to each
suspension as the photoinitiator. The effect of photoinitiator concentration
was evaluated, and the UV exposure time was found to reach a threshold
when an IRGACURE 184 concentration exceeding 3 wt % was used. A 30
μm thick shim ring spacer was placed on each coated slide. The
desired volume of the coated microsphere suspension was injected into
the sample case and then sealed with a glass coverslip.
Scheme 1
Flowchart
of the Process Used To Coat Silica Microspheres and Slides
with MOPS Monolayers
Authors: Y Panitchob; G Senthil Murugan; M N Zervas; P Horak; S Berneschi; S Pelli; G Nunzi Conti; J S Wilkinson Journal: Opt Express Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: D J Thomson; F Y Gardes; Y Hu; G Mashanovich; M Fournier; P Grosse; J-M Fedeli; G T Reed Journal: Opt Express Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Angel Fernandez-Bravo; Kaiyuan Yao; Edward S Barnard; Nicholas J Borys; Elizabeth S Levy; Bining Tian; Cheryl A Tajon; Luca Moretti; M Virginia Altoe; Shaul Aloni; Kenes Beketayev; Francesco Scotognella; Bruce E Cohen; Emory M Chan; P James Schuck Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Sandra J Veen; Oleg Antoniuk; Bart Weber; Marco A C Potenza; Stefano Mazzoni; Peter Schall; Gerard H Wegdam Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Gyu Leem; Shishan Zhang; Andrew C Jamison; Eduard Galstyan; Irene Rusakova; Bernd Lorenz; Dmitri Litvinov; T Randall Lee Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 9.229