Literature DB >> 34056126

The Clinical Significance of Fluctuations in the Minute-to-minute Urine Flow Rate and in its Minute-to-minute Variability During Septic Events in Critically Ill Patients.

Anna Shalman1, Yoram Klein2, Ronen Toledano3, Yuval Wolecki1, Yoav Bichovsky1, Leonid Koyfman2, Anton Osyntsov4, Asaf Acker5, Moti Klein1, Evgeni Brotfain1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Septic events complicated by hemodynamic instability can lead to decreased organ perfusion, multiple organ failure, and even death. Acute renal failure is a common complication of sepsis, affecting up to 50-70 % of cases, and it is routinely diagnosed by close monitoring of urine output. We postulated that analysis of the minute-to-minute changes in the urine flow rate (UFR) and also of the changes in its minute-to-minute variability might lead to earlier diagnosis of renal failure. We accordingly analyzed the clinical significance of these two parameters in a group of critically ill patients suffering from new septic events.
METHODS: The study was retrospective and observational. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the hospital records of 50 critically ill patients who were admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU) and developed a new septic event characterized by fever with leukocytosis or leukopenia. On admission to the ICU, a Foley catheter was inserted into the urinary bladder of each patient. The catheter was then connected to an electronic urinometer - a collecting and measurement system that employs an optical drop detector to measure urine flow. Urine flow rate variability (UFRV) was defined as the change in UFR from minute to minute.
RESULTS: Both the minute-to-minute UFR and the minute-to-minute UFRV decreased significantly immediately after each new septic episode, and they remained low until fluid resuscitation was begun (p < 0.001 for both parameters). Statistical analysis by the Pearson method demonstrated a strong direct correlation between the decrease in UFR and the decrease in the systemic mean arterial pressure (MAP) (R = 0.03, p = 0.003) and between the decrease in UFRV and the decrease in the MAP (R = 0.03, p = 0.004). Additionally, both the UFR and the UFRV demonstrated good responses to fluid administration prior to improvement in the MAP.
CONCLUSION: We consider that minute-to-minute changes in UFR and UFRV could potentially serve as early and sensitive signals of clinical deterioration during new septic events in critically ill patients. We also suggest that these parameters might be able to identify the optimal endpoint for the administration of fluid resuscitative measures in such patients.
© 2020 Anna Shalman et al. published by Sciendo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Urine flow rate; critically ill patients; intensive care unit; sepsis; urine flow rate variability

Year:  2020        PMID: 34056126      PMCID: PMC8158326          DOI: 10.2478/rjaic-2020-0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 2392-7518


  14 in total

1.  Urine flow rate monitoring in hypovolemic multiple trauma patients.

Authors:  Evgeni Brotfain; Yoram Klein; Ronen Toledano; Leonid Koyfman; Dmitry Frank; Micha Y Shamir; Moti Klein
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  The implications and management of septic acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Zaccaria Ricci; Andrea Polito; Angelo Polito; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Erythrocyte-derived microvesicles amplify systemic inflammation by thrombin-dependent activation of complement.

Authors:  Daniel Zecher; Arun Cumpelik; Jürg A Schifferli
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Minute-to-minute urine flow rate variability: a retrospective survey of its ability to provide early warning of acute hypotension in critically ill multiple trauma patients.

Authors:  Evgeni Brotfain; Yoram Klein; Ronen Toledano; Micha Yitzhak Shamir; Leonid Koyfman; Uri Barak; Tamar Guttmann; Alexander Zlotnik; Moti Klein
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Acute renal failure in patients with sepsis in a surgical ICU: predictive factors, incidence, comorbidity, and outcome.

Authors:  Eric A J Hoste; Norbert H Lameire; Raymond C Vanholder; Dominique D Benoit; Johan M A Decruyenaere; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Clinical approach to the patient with AKI and sepsis.

Authors:  Mélanie Godin; Patrick Murray; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 7.  Sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Richard S Hotchkiss; Lyle L Moldawer; Steven M Opal; Konrad Reinhart; Isaiah R Turnbull; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 8.  Complement Interactions with Blood Cells, Endothelial Cells and Microvesicles in Thrombotic and Inflammatory Conditions.

Authors:  Diana Karpman; Anne-lie Ståhl; Ida Arvidsson; Karl Johansson; Sebastian Loos; Ramesh Tati; Zivile Békássy; Ann-Charlotte Kristoffersson; Maria Mossberg; Robin Kahn
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Clinical review: hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Guillermo Gutierrez; H David Reines; Marian E Wulf-Gutierrez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Carol George; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.