| Literature DB >> 34055582 |
Amar Nath Chatterjee1, Fahad Al Basir2, Muqrin A Almuqrin3, Jayanta Mondal4, Ilyas Khan5.
Abstract
In this research article, we establish a fractional-order mathematical model to explore the infections of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus. We introduce a set of fractional differential equations taking uninfected epithelial cells, infected epithelial cells, SARS-CoV-2 virus, and CTL response cell accounting for the lytic and non-lytic effects of immune responses. We also include the effect of a commonly used antiviral drug in COVID-19 treatment in an optimal control-theoretic approach. The stability of the equilibria of the fractional ordered system using qualitative theory. Numerical simulations are presented using an iterative scheme in Matlab in support of the analytical results.Entities:
Keywords: Fractional calculus; Lytic and nonlytic effect; Mathematical model; Optimal control; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2021 PMID: 34055582 PMCID: PMC8139470 DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Results Phys ISSN: 2211-3797 Impact factor: 4.476
Fig. 1Transmission dynamics of COVID-19 within the host of the mathematical model (5).
Fig. 2The system trajectories (7) varies with . Other parameters are taken from Table 1.
Parameter values of the system (7) and (20).
| Parameter | Definition | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Production rate of uninfected epithelial cell | 5 | |
| Disease transmission rate | 0.0001 | |
| Death rate of epithelial cells | 0.1 | |
| Death rate of infected epithelial cells | 0.1 | |
| Removal rate of virus | 0.1 | |
| Decay rate of CTL | 0.1 | |
| Efficacy of nonlytic component | 0.01 | |
| Efficacy of lytic component | ||
| Number of new virus produced | 10–100 | |
| CTL proliferation rate | 0.22 | |
| Maximum proliferation of CTL | 100 | |
| Drug effectiveness of blocking infection | 0–1 | |
| Drug effectiveness of inhibiting infection | 0–1 |
Fig. 3The system trajectories (7) for different value of with the set of parameters as in Table 1.
Fig. 4The system trajectories (7) varies with with the parameters values from Table 1.
Fig. 5Numerical solution of FOCP.
Fig. 6Optimal control profile of control variables.