Literature DB >> 34055465

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Advancing Cancer Research.

John Kalantari1,2, Heidi Nelson1,3, Nicholas Chia1,2,4.   

Abstract

The "No Free Lunch" theorem states that for any algorithm, elevated performance over one class of problems is offset by its performance over another. Stated differently, no algorithm works for everything. Instead, designing effective algorithms often means exploiting prior knowledge of data relationships specific to a given problem. This "unreasonable efficacy" is especially desirable for complex and seemingly intractable problems in the natural sciences. One such area that is rife with the need for better algorithms is cancer biology-a field where relatively few insights are being generated from relatively large amounts of data. In part, this is due to the inability of mere statistics to reflect cancer as a genetic evolutionary process-one that involves cells actively mutating in order to navigate host barriers, outcompete neighboring cells, and expand spatially. Our work is built upon the central proposition that the Markov Decision Process (MDP) can better represent the process by which cancer arises and progresses. More specifically, by encoding a cancer cell's complex behavior as a MDP, we seek to model the series of genetic changes, or evolutionary trajectory, that leads to cancer as an optimal decision process. We posit that using an Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) approach will enable us to reverse engineer an optimal policy and reward function based on a set of expert demonstrations extracted from the DNA of patient tumors. The inferred reward function and optimal policy can subsequently be used to extrapolate the evolutionary trajectory of any tumor. Here, we introduce a Bayesian nonparametric IRL model (PUR-IRL) where the number of reward functions is a priori unbounded in order to account for uncertainty in cancer data, i.e., the existence of latent trajectories and non-uniform sampling. We show that PUR-IRL is "unreasonably effective" in gaining interpretable and intuitive insights about cancer progression from high-dimensional genome data.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 34055465      PMCID: PMC8159182     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Conf AAAI Artif Intell        ISSN: 2159-5399


  21 in total

1.  A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.

Authors:  Pablo Cingolani; Adrian Platts; Le Lily Wang; Melissa Coon; Tung Nguyen; Luan Wang; Susan J Land; Xiangyi Lu; Douglas M Ruden
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 2.  Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms.

Authors:  Scott Valastyan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge.

Authors:  Katarzyna Tomczak; Patrycja Czerwińska; Maciej Wiznerowicz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015

6.  TITAN: inference of copy number architectures in clonal cell populations from tumor whole-genome sequence data.

Authors:  Gavin Ha; Andrew Roth; Jaswinder Khattra; Julie Ho; Damian Yap; Leah M Prentice; Nataliya Melnyk; Andrew McPherson; Ali Bashashati; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Jiarui Ding; Alan Le; Jamie Rosner; Karey Shumansky; Marco A Marra; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Inferring modes of evolution from colorectal cancer with residual polyp of origin.

Authors:  Minsoo Kim; Brooke R Druliner; Nikolaos Vasmatzis; Taejeong Bae; Nicholas Chia; Alexej Abyzov; Lisa A Boardman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-26

8.  The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website.

Authors:  S Bamford; E Dawson; S Forbes; J Clements; R Pettett; A Dogan; A Flanagan; J Teague; P A Futreal; M R Stratton; R Wooster
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Justin Guinney; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Xin Wang; Aurélien de Reyniès; Andreas Schlicker; Charlotte Soneson; Laetitia Marisa; Paul Roepman; Gift Nyamundanda; Paolo Angelino; Brian M Bot; Jeffrey S Morris; Iris M Simon; Sarah Gerster; Evelyn Fessler; Felipe De Sousa E Melo; Edoardo Missiaglia; Hena Ramay; David Barras; Krisztian Homicsko; Dipen Maru; Ganiraju C Manyam; Bradley Broom; Valerie Boige; Beatriz Perez-Villamil; Ted Laderas; Ramon Salazar; Joe W Gray; Douglas Hanahan; Josep Tabernero; Rene Bernards; Stephen H Friend; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Jan Paul Medema; Anguraj Sadanandam; Lodewyk Wessels; Mauro Delorenzi; Scott Kopetz; Louis Vermeulen; Sabine Tejpar
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Distinct microbes, metabolites, and ecologies define the microbiome in deficient and proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Vanessa L Hale; Patricio Jeraldo; Jun Chen; Michael Mundy; Janet Yao; Sambhawa Priya; Gary Keeney; Kelly Lyke; Jason Ridlon; Bryan A White; Amy J French; Stephen N Thibodeau; Christian Diener; Osbaldo Resendis-Antonio; Jaime Gransee; Tumpa Dutta; Xuan-Mai Petterson; Jaeyun Sung; Ran Blekhman; Lisa Boardman; David Larson; Heidi Nelson; Nicholas Chia
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.