Literature DB >> 34055427

The Combination of Interferon-Alpha and Ponatinib Enables Faster and Deeper Molecular Responses in Patient with De Novo Blast Crisis of CML: Interferon-Alpha May Return as a CML Treatment.

Kunio Hayashi1, Kazuhiro Ikegame2, Naoto Takahashi3.   

Abstract

In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, its effectiveness in treating chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has been improved, ensuring the same prognosis as that of healthy people of the same age. However, there are some patients with de novo blast crisis that undergoes acute conversion from the time of diagnosis and does not respond to TKI treatment, especially in the older patients. Here, we present a case of an older patient with de novo lymphoid crisis who was first treated with a combination of TKI and chemotherapy, but it was difficult to maintain a durable deep molecular response (DMR). After he achieved major molecular response (MMR) or less, it was possible to suppress IS% to DMR by performing a combined treatment with interferon-α (IFN-α) and ponatinib. It is considered that DMR can be maintained by the combination of the two-way action of IFN-α, that is, the transfer of dormant CML stem cells to the cellcycle and the activation of a specific immune response to CML cells. This clinical result suggests the possibility of the re-emergence of IFN-α, which has been used a therapeutic drug in the past.
Copyright © 2021 Kunio Hayashi et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34055427      PMCID: PMC8112961          DOI: 10.1155/2021/5518727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Hematol        ISSN: 2090-6579


1. Introduction

Long-term survival in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) was not possible to achieve until the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Until the era of TKI treatment, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and interferon-α (IFN-α) therapy were the available treatment options; however, they were successful only in a limited number of people. TKIs have significantly improved survival outcomes in CML patients [1], and the possibility to discontinue TKI treatment for successful cases without recurrence has been recently explored [2, 3]. However, there are some CML patients who do not achieve a deep molecular response (DMR) and they have to continue TKI therapy in spite of various side effects. In the case of de novo blast crisis, it is much more difficult to achieve MRD [4]. Although allo-SCT can be selected as a treatment mode, it is associated with high risks and is generally not indicated for older patients. For patients with chronic phase CML (CML-CP) who cannot obtain optimal response, some investigators were using a combination of IFN-α and TKI for treatment [5, 6]. Through this combination treatment, they have succeeded in obtaining a durable DMR [7]. In this report, we present a case of a patient with de novo blast crisis treated with the same combination after the chemotherapy to obtain early DMR and maintain a stable condition. This combination of IFN-α and TKI suggests the possibility of a resurgence of IFN-α in the treatment of CML.

2. Case Presentation

A 68-year-old man was referred to our hospital, who presented with fever and loss of appetite. His routine annual health checkup results were normal and he had no history of an illness that required hospitalization. He had developed fever and cough approximately 10 days previously and had been treated by a doctor nearby. However, a blood test revealed a high white blood cell count of 25, 000/μl and he was advised to visit our hospital. Laboratory test results on admission are shown in Table 1. Although he was suspected of having Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoid leukemia, the diagnosis of de novo lymphoid blast crisis CML was confirmed based on the results of the examinations. In the immunophenotypic data, blasts strongly expressed HLA-DR, CD34, CD19, CD10, and CD79a. The breakpoint was found in the major BCR, and the minor breakpoint region associated with Ph chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia was not detected. Dasatinib was initiated as the first-line therapy with a continuous low-dose cytarabine, but there was no hematological effect. The chemotherapy regimen was changed to the reduced doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin (adriacin), and dexamethasone (Hyper CVAD) with ponatinib 15 mg/day [6, 8]. Hematological remission was obtained on day 40 of this treatment. At that time, the bone marrow nucleated cell count was 1.1 × 104/μl and the proportion of blast cells was 1.4%, while the major BCR-ABL1 mRNA was 94 × 103 copies/μg. After the chemotherapy with Hyper CVAD, white blood cells were less than 1000/μl for 20 days and neutrocytes were less than 500/μl for 22 days during which time endogenous infection was complicated even under antibiotic treatment. In order to avoid worsening infectious diseases of febrile neutropenia, the chemotherapy was discontinued and treatment was changed to a combination of ponatinib 30 mg/day and IFN-α (300 MIU/day). In one month, the IS-PCR value was decreased to 0.0056% (MR4). The dose of ponatinib was reduced to 15 mg/day and IFN-α was continued at 300 MIU/day twice a week; after that, the IS-PCR value was decreased further to 0.0016%. When IFN-α was discontinued, the IS-PCR value was increased to 0.0064%. When IFN-α 300 MIU/day was restarted twice a week, the IS-PCR value was decreased to 0.0007% after 4.5 months and it fell below the detection sensitivity limit after another 4 months. The IS-PCR value was not stable and was increased again to 0.0055% after 3 months. When the dose of IFN-α was increased to 300 MIU/day five days a week, the IS-PCR value fell below the detection sensitivity in 2 months. Frequent measurements of the BCR-ABL1 transcript revealed fluctuations in its values, and IFN-α suppressed it and reduced the width of fluctuations in a dose-dependent manner. The course of treatment and the transition of IS% are shown in Figure 1. Because the de novo blast crises in older patients are maladapted for stem cell transplantation, such a deep molecular genetic response of BCR-ABL1 to INF-α is a great way to obtain a better prognosis.
Table 1

Laboratory findings on admission.

Peripheral blood
WBC25, 200/μl
Blast78%
Stab0%
Seg1%
Lymph20%
Mono0%
Eo1%
Baso0%
RBC220 × 10e4/μl
Hb7.1 g/dl
Ht20.90%
Plt2.2 × 10e4/μl
NAP-R89% (61∼99)
NAP-S381 (170∼355)

Coagulation
PT13.3 sec
APTT34.8 sec
Fibrinogen321 mg/dl
FDP3.5 μg/μl
D-dimer1.2 μg/ml
AT-III110%

Biochemistry
TP7.0 g/dl
Alb3.9 g/dl
Tbili0.4 mg/dl
Dbili0.1 mg/dl
AST21 U/l
ALT23 U/l
LDH248 U/l
γGTP75 U/l
BUN14.7 mg/dl
Cr0.93 mg/dl
UA5.4 mg/dl
eGFR62.5 ml/min
Glu71 mg/dl
CRP1.8 mg/dl
Ferritin1011.6 ng/ml

Bone marrow
NCC28.8 × 10e4/μl
Mgk+
Blast98.80%
M/E165

G-Band karyotype of bone marrow
46, XY, t(9; 22) (q34; q11.2) [16]
46, XY [4]

BCR-ABL1 transcripts
Major BCR-ABL1 18 × 10e5, HLA-DR+

Immunophenotype of blasts in bone marrow
CD34+, HLA = DR+, MPO−, CD3−, TdT+, CD19+, CD79a+, CD13±

Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cells; blast, myeloblast; myelo, myelocytes; meta, metamyelocytes; stab, stab cells; seg, segmented cells; lym, lymphocytes; mono, monocytes; eo, eosinophiles; baso, basophiles; Hb, hemoglobin; Ht, hematocrit; Plt, platelet; NAP-rate, neutrophil alkaline phosphatase activities-rate; NAT-score, neutrophil alkaline phosphatase activities-score; NCC, nuclear cell counts; Mgk, megakaryocytes; M/E, myeloid erythroid ratio; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product; AT-III, antithrombin-III.

Figure 1

Clinical course of de novo blast crisis. Abbreviation: Nilo, nilotinib; Dasa, dasatinib; Pona, ponatinib; cLDAC, continuous infusion of low dose cytarabine (AraC); Hyper CVAD, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin (adriacin), and dexamethasone.

3. Discussion

In the present case of the de novo lymphoid crisis in older patient, we succeeded to suppress the fluctuations in IS values and maintain DMR using the treatment of ponatinib combined with IFN-α. IFN-α therapy has become less commonly used with the advent of TKIs, but some studies suggested the possible effective use of IFN-α. In the Stop Imatinib (STIM) study, which first investigated the discontinuation of TKIs, having a history of IFN-α treatment was one of the prognostic factors that enhanced treatment-free response (TFR) [9]. The German CML and Scandinavian CML research groups have shown that a mode of combination treatment with IFN-α could elicit a faster and deeper response in high-risk CML patients than treatment with imatinib alone. These studies suggested that IFN-α provided clinical benefits [10]. TKIs have the effect of inactivating Ph-positive leukemia cells and inducing apoptosis but cannot eliminate these cells directly [3]. IFN-α acts on dormant leukemia stem cells, which cause the relapse, and recruits them into the cell cycle to be affected by TKI and further regulates gene expression in CML cells or induces cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells [11]. Due to the synergistic effect of these various actions, the combined treatment of ponatinib and IFN-α is thought to suppress the progression of the disease. As observed in our case, the efficacy of IFN-α appears to be dose-dependent, but detailed studies to establish the optimal dosage and treatment duration of IFN-α are needed in the future.
  11 in total

1.  Hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib versus hyper-CVAD plus dasatinib as frontline therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Koji Sasaki; Elias J Jabbour; Farhad Ravandi; Nicholas J Short; Deborah A Thomas; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Naval G Daver; Tapan M Kadia; Marina Y Konopleva; Nitin Jain; Ghayas C Issa; Vicki Jeanis; Haim G Moore; Rebecca S Garris; Naveen Pemmaraju; Jorge E Cortes; Susan M O'Brien; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial.

Authors:  François-Xavier Mahon; Delphine Réa; Joëlle Guilhot; François Guilhot; Françoise Huguet; Franck Nicolini; Laurence Legros; Aude Charbonnier; Agnès Guerci; Bruno Varet; Gabriel Etienne; Josy Reiffers; Philippe Rousselot
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era: Cohort study of 477 patients.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Hagop M Kantarjian; Ahmad Ghorab; Koji Sasaki; Elias J Jabbour; Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Ghayas C Issa; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Devendra Kc; Sara Dellasala; Sherry Pierce; Marina Konopleva; William G Wierda; Srdan Verstovsek; Naval G Daver; Tapan M Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Susan O'Brien; Zeev Estrov; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian J Druker; François Guilhot; Stephen G O'Brien; Insa Gathmann; Hagop Kantarjian; Norbert Gattermann; Michael W N Deininger; Richard T Silver; John M Goldman; Richard M Stone; Francisco Cervantes; Andreas Hochhaus; Bayard L Powell; Janice L Gabrilove; Philippe Rousselot; Josy Reiffers; Jan J Cornelissen; Timothy Hughes; Hermine Agis; Thomas Fischer; Gregor Verhoef; John Shepherd; Giuseppe Saglio; Alois Gratwohl; Johan L Nielsen; Jerald P Radich; Bengt Simonsson; Kerry Taylor; Michele Baccarani; Charlene So; Laurie Letvak; Richard A Larson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  [Chronic myeloid leukemia harboring T315I and F317L mutations successfully treated with interferon-α and ponatinib].

Authors:  Yotaro Motomura; Kosuke Arai; Kota Yoshifuji; Saeko Sonokawa; Sayaka Suzuki; Takashi Kumagai
Journal:  Rinsho Ketsueki       Date:  2019

Review 6.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: First-line drug of choice.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 7.  Re-emergence of interferon-α in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  M Talpaz; R Hehlmann; A Quintás-Cardama; J Mercer; J Cortes
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances.

Authors:  Cosimo Cumbo; Luisa Anelli; Giorgina Specchia; Francesco Albano
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Interferon-α Revisited: Individualized Treatment Management Eased the Selective Pressure of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on BCR-ABL1 Mutations Resulting in a Molecular Response in High-Risk CML Patients.

Authors:  Vaclava Polivkova; Peter Rohon; Hana Klamova; Olga Cerna; Martina Divoka; Nikola Curik; Jan Zach; Martin Novak; Iuri Marinov; Simona Soverini; Edgar Faber; Katerina Machova Polakova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Hochhaus; M Baccarani; R T Silver; C Schiffer; J F Apperley; F Cervantes; R E Clark; J E Cortes; M W Deininger; F Guilhot; H Hjorth-Hansen; T P Hughes; J J W M Janssen; H M Kantarjian; D W Kim; R A Larson; J H Lipton; F X Mahon; J Mayer; F Nicolini; D Niederwieser; F Pane; J P Radich; D Rea; J Richter; G Rosti; P Rousselot; G Saglio; S Saußele; S Soverini; J L Steegmann; A Turkina; A Zaritskey; R Hehlmann
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.