Literature DB >> 34055337

Routine use of the Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire in a paediatric pain clinic.

John M Goddard1, Jane Robinson1, Rachel Hiscock1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of outcomes from health interventions are of increasing importance, primarily to identify effective and safe treatment, but also to justify funding decisions. The Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ) is a self-report questionnaire, validated in 11-18 year olds, assessing the impact of pain in multiple domains of adolescent life. The similarly validated Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire for Parents (BAPQ-P) uses the same domains as the BAPQ, assessing the functioning and development of the adolescent from the parents' perspective.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study, planning to routinely collect BAPQ/BAPQ-P data at initial assessment and 6 months later. All patients aged between 5 and 19 attending our chronic pain clinic for the first time between December 2009 and December 2014 were mailed BAPQ and BAPQ-P questionnaires before the first appointment and 6 months after the first appointment.
RESULTS: In total, 376 of 386 families returned questionnaires at time 0 and 96 after 6 months, 26% of those responded at time 0. We found statistically significant differences on patients' BAPQ questionnaires from 0 to 6 months showing improvement in all domains. A different result was found on parents' questionnaires where we only found a statistically significant difference on daily and emotional functioning. When comparing patient and parent questionnaires at 0 and 6 months, we found statistically significant differences between patients' and parents' questionnaires in the daily functioning and development domains.
CONCLUSION: We believe BAPQ and BAPQ-P measurement proved useful tools to assess response to pain management input in adolescents over a 6-month period. Our experience and results suggest that these tools can, with appropriate administrative support, be used in routine clinical practice to assess patient outcomes. We also believe that BAPQ and BAPQ-P measurements have a utility to audit pain clinic activity and potentially a use in demonstrating beneficial outcomes to commissioners. © The British Pain Society 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire; adolescent; child; pain; school child

Year:  2020        PMID: 34055337      PMCID: PMC8138617          DOI: 10.1177/2049463720927067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  12 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara King; Christine T Chambers; Anna Huguet; Rebecca C MacNevin; Patrick J McGrath; Louise Parker; Amanda J MacDonald
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the parent report version of the Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ-P): A multidimensional parent report instrument to assess the impact of chronic pain on adolescents.

Authors:  Christopher Eccleston; Lance M McCracken; Abbie Jordan; Michelle Sleed
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  The Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ): development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the impact of chronic pain on adolescents.

Authors:  Christopher Eccleston; Abbie Jordan; Lance M McCracken; Michelle Sleed; Hannah Connell; Jacqui Clinch
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Disability in adolescents with chronic pain: Patterns and predictors across different domains of functioning.

Authors:  Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Effectiveness of interdisciplinary interventions in paediatric chronic pain management: a systematic review and subset meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christina Liossi; Lauren Johnstone; Suzanne Lilley; Line Caes; Glyn Williams; Daniel Eric Schoth
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  The Paediatric electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (PaedePPOC): establishment of a binational system for benchmarking children's persistent pain services.

Authors:  Susan M Lord; Hilarie P Tardif; Elizabeth A Kepreotes; Megan Blanchard; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Interdisciplinary Pain Management Improves Pain and Function in Pediatric Patients with Chronic Pain Associated with Joint Hypermobility Syndrome.

Authors:  Gadi Revivo; Diane K Amstutz; Christine M Gagnon; Zachary L McCormick
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  The influence of anxiety reduction on clinical response to pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ethan Benore; Alexandra D'Auria; Gerard A Banez; Sarah Worley; Anne Tang
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Adolescent social development and chronic pain.

Authors:  Christopher Eccleston; Sarah Wastell; Geert Crombez; Abbie Jordan
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.931

10.  A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11.

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Winfried Rief; Antonia Barke; Qasim Aziz; Michael I Bennett; Rafael Benoliel; Milton Cohen; Stefan Evers; Nanna B Finnerup; Michael B First; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Stein Kaasa; Eva Kosek; Patricia Lavand'homme; Michael Nicholas; Serge Perrot; Joachim Scholz; Stephan Schug; Blair H Smith; Peter Svensson; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.