Literature DB >> 34055334

Technical challenges of performing S1 root block: role for double needle and multilevel needle technique.

Sanjeeva Gupta1, Harun Gupta2, Ganesan Baranidharan2, Manohar Sharma3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: S1 root block is performed for pain in the lower limbs due to S1 nerve root inflammation at the L5/S1 disc level or compression in the lateral recess. We often note anterior or posterior spread of contrast away from the L5/S1 disc through an anatomically appropriate needle tip placement. We frequently encounter vascular spread when performing S1 root blocks, and the reported incidence varies between 10.4% and 27.8%. There is no clear strategy published to manage these challenges. In such clinical scenarios, we propose a double needle and/or a multilevel needle technique. CASE: A 39-year-old male presented with radicular pain in the left S1 distribution which matched the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan findings and thus he was listed for a left S1 root block. A 22G needle was placed at the S1 level and upon injecting the contrast, vascular spread and anterior and distal spread along the nerve root were noted and the contrast did not reach the site of the pathology, the L5/S1 disc. The contrast continued to spread anteriorly despite withdrawing the needle. A second needle was placed medial and inferior to the first needle and the contrast spread now was adequate, that is, towards the L5/S1 disc and thus the injection was accomplished in a safe and satisfactory manner without needing to reschedule the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Double needle technique can assist in overcoming problems encountered when performing an S1 root block. The alternatives could be the multilevel technique or to reschedule the procedure or consider a less optimal technique such as a caudal or a lumbar interlaminar epidural. In this technical report, we have highlighted various intervention options to mitigate such challenges and included a flow diagram to assist in decision-making. We have also discussed the possibility of altering the consent to accommodate the changes to the planned procedure. © The British Pain Society 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S1 block; double needle; epidural steroid; neuropathic pain; radicular pain; spinal pain

Year:  2020        PMID: 34055334      PMCID: PMC8138611          DOI: 10.1177/2049463720960497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  15 in total

1.  Morphology of the human internal vertebral venous plexus: a cadaver study after intravenous Araldite CY 221 injection.

Authors:  R J Groen; H J Groenewegen; H A van Alphen; P V Hoogland
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1997-10

Review 2.  Spinal Injections for Pain Management.

Authors:  William E Palmer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of Epidural Spreading Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection with High-Volume Injectate via the Subpedicular Versus the Retrodiscal Approach.

Authors:  Won-Joong Kim; Hwa-Yong Shin; Seung Hee Yoo; Hahck Soo Park
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Outcome of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection According to the Severity of Lumbar Foraminal Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Min Cheol Chang; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration.

Authors:  D L Renfrew; T E Moore; M H Kathol; G Y el-Khoury; J H Lemke; C W Walker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injections.

Authors:  M B Furman; E M O'Brien; T M Zgleszewski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Whitacre Needle Reduces the Incidence of Intravascular Uptake in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.

Authors:  JiHee Hong; Sungwon Jung; Hyuckwon Chang
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Injectate volumes needed to reach specific landmarks in s1 transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Michael B Furman; Sean P Butler; Ruby E Kim; Ariz R Mehta; Jeremy I Simon; Rikin Patel; Thomas S Lee; Ryan S Reeves
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  The S1 "Scotty dog": report of a technique for S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection.

Authors:  David E Fish; Paul C Lee; Daniel B Marcus
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection.

Authors:  Sang Jun Park; Shin Hyung Kim; Seon Ju Kim; Duck Mi Yoon; Kyung Bong Yoon
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.