| Literature DB >> 34054995 |
Nguyen Thi Hai Yen1, Pataporn Sukontamarn1, Truc Ngoc Hoan Dang2.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between sex-composition of children and women's fertility desire in Vietnam. Materials and methods: Using data from the 2014 Vietnam Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), we investigate the association between sex composition of children and desire for additional children among women in reproductive age (15 to 49 years) across Vietnam (N=5,605).Entities:
Keywords: Fertility Desire; Gender Norms; Mix-Gender Preference; Sex Composition; Son Preference; Vietnam
Year: 2020 PMID: 34054995 PMCID: PMC8144484 DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v14i4.5204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Reprod Health ISSN: 1735-9392
Sex composition of children among Vietnamese women of childbearing age
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| All sons | 31.73 | 31.62 |
| Son(s) = Daughter(s) | 28.41 | 28.27 |
| All daughters | 25.56 | 26.32 |
| Daughter(s) > Son(s) | 8.52 | 7.82 |
| Son(s) > Daughter(s) | 5.78 | 5.97 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Note: Sample (%) statistics are calculated from un-weighted data. Population (%) statistics are calculated from weighted data.
Number of sons is more than number of daughter(s) and having at least one daughter.
Number of daughters is more than number of son(s) and having at least one son.
Fertility desire, current number, and sex-composition of children
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Women with one child | 0.001 | ||
| 1 son | 34.99 | 65.01 | |
| 1 daughter | 26.92 | 73.08 | |
| Total | 31.36 | 68.64 | |
| Women with two children | <0.0001 | ||
| Two sons | 95.38 | 4.62 | |
| Two daughters | 86.86 | 13.14 | |
| One son, one daughter | 95.66 | 4.34 | |
| Total | 93.83 | 6.17 | |
| Women with three or | <0.0001 | ||
| All sons | 97.06 | 2.94 | |
| All daughters | 87.35 | 12.65 | |
| Mix gender | 99.31 | 0.69 | |
| Total | 97.36 | 2.64 | |
P-values from Chi-squared tests are reported.
Logistic regressions of women's fertility desire according to the number of current children
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Group 1: Women with one child (Ref. one son) | 0.001 | ||
| One daughter | 1.468** | - | - |
| (0.212) | |||
| Group 2: Women with two children (Ref. two sons) | |||
| Two daughters | 3.851*** | - | |
| (0.864) | |||
| One son and one daughter | 1.072 | - | |
| (0.233) | |||
| Group 3: Women with three or more children (Ref. All sons) | |||
| All daughters | - | - | 9.792** |
| (10.39) | |||
| Mix gender | - | - | 0.160* |
| (0.151) | |||
| Sex ratio at birth at provincial level | 1.03 | 0.993 | 1.088* |
| (0.0201) | (0.0171) | (0.0497) | |
| Age of mother | 0.900* | 0.833*** | 0.968 |
| (0.0653) | (0.0554) | (0.179) | |
| Age at first marriage | 1.086** | 1.077* | 0.874 |
| (0.0454) | (0.0445) | (0.0851) | |
| Age group of mothers at last birth (Ref. 15-20) | |||
| 20-24 | 1.062 | 8.836* | - |
| (0.345) | (10.05) | ||
| 25-29 | 0.796 | 12.30** | 0.884 |
| (0.407) | (15.06) | (1.108) | |
| 30-34 | 0.405 | 6.399 | 0.320 |
| (0.306) | (8.77) | (0.617) | |
| 35-39 | 0.196 | 5.119 | 0.303 |
| (0.202) | (8.399) | (0.874) | |
| 40 and older | 0.118 | - | - |
| (0.168) | |||
| Living with a male partner (Ref. Not living with a male partner) | 11.11*** | 4.370** | - |
| Husband-wife gender equality attitude (Ref. Unacceptance of violence) | 1.155 | 0.586*** | 0.339** |
| (0.17) | (0.104) | (0.182) | |
| Education (Ref: Primary) | |||
| Lower secondary | 1.207 | 1.172 | 1.170 |
| (0.27) | (0.299) | (0.697) | |
| Upper secondary | 1.299 | 1.333 | - |
| (0.322) | (0.412) | ||
| Vocational school | 1.486 | 0.765 | - |
| (0.523) | (0.388) | ||
| College/university & above | 1.746* | 1.25 | - |
| (0.522) | (0.504) | ||
| Religion (Ref. No religion) | |||
| Buddhism | 0.690* | 0.645 | 1.143 |
| (0.139) | (0.227) | (1.039) | |
| Christianity | 1.171 | 3.051*** | 3.598 |
| (0.31) | (0.854) | (3.112) | |
| Other religions | 0.485** | 1.655 | 31.05** |
| (0.175) | (0.855) | (53.15) | |
| Region (Ref. South East) | |||
| Red River Delta | 1.272 | 2.443*** | 2.633 |
| (0.357) | (0.817) | (3.346) | |
| Northern midlands and mountain area | 1.689** | 1.378* | 3.634 |
| (0.431) | (0.465) | (5.386) | |
| North Central and central coastal area | 1.332 | 1.820* | 4.646 |
| (0.339) | (0.598) | (6.163) | |
| Central Highlands | 1.439 | 1.068 | 1.682 |
| (0.358) | (0.36) | (1.687) | |
| Mekong River Delta | 1.058 | 0.627 | - |
| (0.229) | (0.254) | - | |
| Wealth index (Ref. poorest) | |||
| Second | 1.286 | 1.545 | 0.419 |
| (0.324) | (0.465) | (0.358) | |
| Middle | 1.523 | 1.694* | 0.325 |
| (0.395) | (0.512) | (0.242) | |
| Fourth | 0.991 | 0.853 | 1.431 |
| (0.256) | (0.297) | (1.399) | |
| Richest | 1.211 | 1.354 | 1.172 |
| (0.367) | (0.538) | (1.496) | |
| Number of observations | 1,502 | 2,920 | 779 |
| Pseudo R-square | 0.300 | 0.210 | 0.389 |
Note: Certain cells are left blank as some of the control variables were drooped automatically as they predict success or failure completely or there was no observation corresponding to the variable.
Standard errors in parentheses. Significance levels: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1. All models control for mass media access, urban/rural, working status, having elderly in the household, having experience of death of child, and age of youngest child.