| Literature DB >> 34054587 |
Abstract
In order to fully understand gene function, at some point, it is necessary to study the effects in an intact organism. The creation of the first knockout mouse in the late 1980's gave rise to a revolution in the field of integrative physiology that continues to this day. There are many complex choices when selecting a strategy for genetic modification, some of which will be touched on in this review, but the principal focus is to highlight the potential problems and pitfalls arising from the interpretation of in vivo cardiac phenotypes. As an exemplar, we will scrutinize the field of cardiac energetics and the attempts to understand the role of the creatine kinase (CK) energy buffering and transport system in the intact organism. This story highlights the confounding effects of genetic background, sex, and age, as well as the difficulties in interpreting knockout models in light of promiscuous proteins and metabolic redundancy. It will consider the dose-dependent effects and unintended consequences of transgene overexpression, and the need for experimental rigour in the context of in vivo phenotyping techniques. It is intended that this review will not only bring clarity to the field of cardiac energetics, but also aid the non-expert in evaluating and critically assessing data arising from in vivo genetic modification.Entities:
Keywords: creatine kinase; heart failure; integrative physiology; metabolism; transgenic
Year: 2021 PMID: 34054587 PMCID: PMC8160301 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.685064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Checklist for planning or evaluating murine in vivo phenotypes.
| Genetic model |
|
Ubiquitous vs. tissue-specific modification Choice of promoter: determines strength of expression and tissue-specificity Constitutively active vs. inducible Control of integration site and copy number vs. random integration Background genetics |
| Experimental factors |
|
Blinding and randomisation Choice of anaesthetic Choice of phenotyping methodology Measurement standardisation and validation Power calculations – is the study sufficiently powered to conclude no differences? |
| Experimental confounders |
|
Are groups matched for sex or analysed separately? Are groups matched for age? Has the genetic background been defined and fixed? Breeding strategy, e.g., use of littermate controls Diet, temperature, light-dark cycle, oestrus cycle, and health status Time of day for experimental measurements Are there whole-body phenotypes? e.g., altered body composition or metabolic status What else does this gene do? |
Figure 1Creatine biosynthesis and the myocardial creatine kinase (CK) phosphagen system. Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT; EC 2.1.4.1) is predominantly expressed in the kidneys where it combines arginine and glycine to make guanidinoacetate (GAA) or with lysine to make homoarginine (hArg). Circulating GAA is taken up by the liver where GAA N-methyltransferase (GAMT; EC 2.1.1.2) utilises the methyl group from S-adenosyl L-methionine to synthesise creatine. These biosynthetic enzymes are not expressed in cardiomyocytes so creatine must be taken-up via a specific plasma membrane creatine transporter (SLC6A8). Creatine accumulates inside the cell where the sarcomeric mitochondrial isoform of creatine kinase (MtCK; EC:2.7.3.2) catalyses the transfer of a phosphoryl group from ATP to form phosphocreatine (PCr) and ADP. PCr is a high abundance and mobile energy source that can be utilised to rapidly regenerate ATP at times of high demand under the control of the muscle isoform of creatine kinase (the dimer MMCK; EC 2.7.3.2). Free creatine diffuses back to stimulate further oxidative phosphorylation and re-start the cycle. Knockout models exist for all five of these proteins and overexpression models for CK and creatine transporter (CrT). This figure was created using Servier Medical Art by Servier, which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License https://smart.servier.com.
Figure 2The presence or absence of cardiac hypertrophy in CK double knockout mice (CK-dKO) has varied considerably over time and between laboratories, in large part, due to a mixed and changing genetic background. When finally bred onto a pure C57BL/6 J background, no cardiac hypertrophy was evident (Lygate et al., 2012a,b - pure).
Genetically-altered mouse models affecting the creatine kinase system.
| Mouse model/Nomenclature | Cardiac functional phenotype | Selected references |
|---|---|---|
| Loss of function | ||
|
|
Limitations: mixed genetic background in early studies No discernible phenotype |
|
|
|
Limitations: mixed genetic background in early studies Seldom studied in isolation; typically, as double KO No cardiac dysfunction @ 1 year on C57BL/6 background |
|
|
|
Limitations: mixed genetic background in early studies Mixed: reduced contractile reserve by echo? Mixed: variable left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy Mixed: LVH and heart failure in males @ 1 year Mixed: normal post-infarct remodelling and dysfunction C57BL/6: no |
|
|
|
Limitations: guanidinoacetate accumulation; whole-body phenotype Reduced LV systolic pressure Blunted contractile reserve Increased susceptibility to ischaemia/reperfusion Reduced cardiac stroke work >1 year of age Normal post-MI remodelling and dysfunction Normal forced and voluntary running capacity |
|
|
|
Limitations: homoarginine deficiency; severe whole-body phenotype Reduced LV systolic pressure (rescued by creatine) Low heart weight (rescued by creatine) Impaired contractility and relaxation (rescued by hArg) Impaired contractile reserve (rescued by hArg) |
|
|
|
Limitations: whole-body phenotype; residual creatine? Low heart weight; |
|
|
Gain of function | ||
|
|
Limitations: caution with controls and doxycycline dosing No discernible phenotype at baseline Improved recovery from ischaemia/reperfusion Protects against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity Protects against pressure-overload induced chronic heart failure by maintaining myocardial energetics |
|
|
|
Limitations: mild overexpression of transgene No discernible phenotype at baseline Protects against ischaemia/reperfusion injury, but not chronic heart failure despite maintaining normal PCr/ATP |
|
|
|
Limitations: highly variable creatine levels Very high levels of myocardial creatine cause heart failure Moderate creatine elevation protects against ischaemia/reperfusion injury but not chronic heart failure |
|