| Literature DB >> 34054557 |
Daniela Peruzzu1, Maria Teresa Pagano1, Marina Pierdominici1, Anna Ruggieri1, Andrea Antinori2, Gianpiero D'Offizi2, Nicola Petrosillo2, Fabrizio Palmieri2, Pierluca Piselli2, Evangelo Boumis2, Stefania Notari2, Emanuele Nicastri2, Chiara Agrati2, Giuseppe Ippolito2, Maria Cristina Gagliardi1, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi2, Elena Ortona1.
Abstract
The outcome of COVID-19 appears to be influenced by vitamin D status of population. Although epidemiological data indicate that COVID-19 produces more severe symptoms and higher mortality in elderly in comparison to young patients and in men in comparison to women to date sex and age differences in vitamin D status in infected patients have not been evaluated yet. In this study we evaluated the levels of circulating 25(OH)D in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 divided accordingly to their sex and age. We also correlated 25(OH)D levels with patient's respiratory status (i.e., PaO2/FiO2 ratio) and with sex hormones plasma levels to analyze the potential relationship of these parameters. We found no significant differences in plasma levels of 25(OH)D between pre- and post-menopausal female patients and age matched male patients. Interestingly, the 25(OH)D plasma levels positively correlated to PaO2/FiO2 ratio only in young patients, regardless of their sex. We also found a significantly positive correlation between 17β-estradiol and 25(OH)D in elderly women and between testosterone and 25(OH)D in elderly men, supporting the role of sex hormones in maintaining 25(OH)D levels. In conclusion, we suggest that a synergy between vitamin D and sex hormones could contribute to the age-related outcome of COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; gender; sex differences; sex hormones; vitamin D
Year: 2021 PMID: 34054557 PMCID: PMC8155348 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.683529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Detection of plasma levels of 25(OH)D and its correlation with PaO2/FiO2 ratio in COVID‐19 patients. (A) Analysis of plasma levels of 25(OH)D detected into female and male patients (left panel) and among the 4 subgroups of patients: A, 40 pre-menopausal females under 45 years; B, 40 males under 45 years; C, 40 post-menopausal females over 55 years; D, 40 males over 55 years. Data referred to plasma levels of 25(OH)D are reported as mean ± SD. (B) Correlation and linear regression analysis of plasma levels of 25(OH)D and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in female and male patients categorized into four groups: A, 40 pre-menopausal females under 45 years (A: < 45 yrs); B, 40 males under 45 years (B: < 45 yrs); C, 40 post-menopausal females over 55 years (C: > 55 yrs); D, 40 males over 55 years (D: > 55 yrs). A significantly positive correlation between plasma levels of 25(OH)D and PaO2/FiO2 ratio is observed in subgroups A and B. The Spearman's rho (R) and P values were determined using the Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Solid lines represent best fits as estimated by linear regression analysis. *, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
FIGURE 2Correlation of plasma 25(OH) vitamin D levels with 17β-estradiol and Testosterone in COVID-19 patients. (A) Correlation and linear regression analysis of plasma levels of 25(OH)D and 17β-estradiol in female and male patients categorized into four groups: A, 40 pre-menopausal females under 45 years (A: < 45 yrs); B, 40 males under 45 years (B: < 45 yrs); C, 40 post-menopausal females over 55 years (C: > 55 yrs); D, 40 males over 55 years (D: > 55 yrs). A significantly positive correlation between plasma levels of 25(OH)D and 17β-estradiol is observed in subgroup C. (B) Correlation and linear regression analysis of plasma levels of 25(OH)D and testosterone into four groups. A significantly positive correlation between plasma levels of 25(OH)D and testosterone levels is observed in males and in subgroup D. The Spearman's rho (R) and P values were determined using the Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Solid lines represent best fits as estimated by linear by linear regression analysis. *, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.