Gang Ye1,2,3, Jian Liu3, Xinkai Qiu2,3, Sebastian Stäter3, Li Qiu4, Yuru Liu2,3, Xuwen Yang3, Richard Hildner3, L Jan Anton Koster3, Ryan C Chiechi2,3. 1. Center for Biomedical Optics and Photonics (CBOP) & College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P. R. China. 2. Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Yunnan Key Laboratory for Micro/Nano Materials & Technology, National Center for International Research on Photoelectric and Energy Materials, School of Materials and Energy, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, P. R. China.
Abstract
We demonstrate the impact of the type and position of pendant groups on the n-doping of low-band gap donor-acceptor (D-A) copolymers. Polar glycol ether groups simultaneously increase the electron affinities of D-A copolymers and improve the host/dopant miscibility compared to nonpolar alkyl groups, improving the doping efficiency by a factor of over 40. The bulk mobility of the doped films increases with the fraction of polar groups, leading to a best conductivity of 0.08 S cm-1 and power factor (PF) of 0.24 μW m-1 K-2 in the doped copolymer with the polar pendant groups on both the D and A moieties. We used spatially resolved absorption spectroscopy to relate commensurate morphological changes to the dispersion of dopants and to the relative local doping efficiency, demonstrating a direct relationship between the morphology of the polymer phase, the solvation of the molecular dopant, and the electrical properties of doped films. Our work offers fundamental new insights into the influence of the physical properties of pendant chains on the molecular doping process, which should be generalizable to any molecularly doped polymer films.
We demonstrate the impact of the type and position of pendant groups on the n-doping of low-band gap donor-acceptor (D-A) copolymers. Polar glycol ether groups simultaneously increase the electron affinities of D-A copolymers and improve the host/dopant miscibility compared to nonpolar alkyl groups, improving the doping efficiency by a factor of over 40. The bulk mobility of the doped films increases with the fraction of polar groups, leading to a best conductivity of 0.08 S cm-1 and power factor (PF) of 0.24 μW m-1 K-2 in the dopedcopolymer with the polar pendant groups on both the D and A moieties. We used spatially resolved absorption spectroscopy to relate commensurate morphological changes to the dispersion of dopants and to the relative local doping efficiency, demonstrating a direct relationship between the morphology of the polymer phase, the solvation of the molecular dopant, and the electrical properties of doped films. Our work offers fundamental new insights into the influence of the physical properties of pendant chains on the molecular doping process, which should be generalizable to any molecularly dopedpolymer films.
The two primary synthetic
handles for manipulating the properties
of conjugated polymers are the backbone, for controlling the electronic
structure, and the pendant groups, for controlling solubility and
processing. Much of the conventional wisdom of structure–property
relationships, however, derives from the performance of thin films
of conjugated polymers in their pristine, undoped, semiconducting
state, for example, photovoltaics and field-effect transistors. Thermoelectric
devices exploit the difference in entropy that develops in response
to a thermal gradient across a population of charge carriers. Molecular
doping[1−7] (i.e., chemical doping with redox-active organiccompounds) tends
to be milder and more amenable to solution processing compared to
other methods, as harsher dopants tend to render conjugated polymers
insoluble. Thus, the development of (particularly n-type) conjugated
polymers for thermoelectric applications requires developing synthetic
strategies for optimizing both doping efficiency and the morphology
of molecularly doped films.The strategy for designing materials
for organic thermoelectric
devices is to modulate the carrier density by molecular doping to
optimize the power factor (PF = S2σ,
where S and σ are the Seebeck coefficient and
electrical conductivity, respectively).[8,9] Molecular doping
can be accomplished by simply mixing the polymer and (pre)dopant,
casting the mixture into a film, and annealing. However, relatively
large organicdopants tend to disturb the packing of host (macro)molecules
and degrade charge transport.[10] Thus, one
design principle is to maximize doping efficiency to generate a high
density of carriers with a minimal dopant. So far, many factors, such
as the strength of the dopant, the morphology of the doped film, and
the processing conditions, have been exploited to increase doping
efficiency.[11−15] However, most studies have focused on p-doped organic semiconductors;
the development of their n-type counterparts lags behind. Most n-type
organic semiconductors possess high-lying lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital (LUMO) levels (≥−4.0 eV), which impedes the
development of air-stable n-type dopants and sufficiently high doping
efficiency.In their pioneering work on n-doping of solution-processed
conjugated
polymers, Chabinyc and co-workers reported a maximum electrical conductivity
of 10–3 S cm–1 poly{[N,N′-bis(2-octyldodecyl)-naphthalene-1,4,5,8-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl]-alt-5,5′-(2,2′-bithiophene)} (PNDI2OD-T2)
doped by (4-(1,3-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzoimidazol-2-yl)phenyl)dimethylamine
(n-DMBI).[10] Bao and co-workers
systematically tuned the donor–acceptor (D–A) backbone
structure and achieved a conductivity of 0.45 S cm–1.[16] Pei and co-workers similarly modified
the backbone of conjugated polymers to increase the charge mobility
and doping level, leading to an even higher electrical conductivity
of 14 S cm–1.[17] Wang et al. furthered this trend, reporting a conductivity of
2.4 S cm–1 in n-dopedpoly(benzimidazole benzophenanthroline).[18] Recently, several groups, including ours, successfully
utilized these insights into molecular doping to enhance the thermoelectric
properties of doped D–A copolymers by using a weaker donor
moiety.[19−21] Recently, Lei et al. reported a
pyrazine-flanked diketopyrrolopyrrole polymer with a weak donor backbone
structure that exhibits high n-type electrical conductivities of up
to 8.4 S cm–1 and PF up to 57.3 μW m–1 K–2.[22] Wang and Takimiya
reported an acceptor–acceptor n-type copolymerconsisting of
naphthodithiophenediimide and bithiopheneimide building blocks, showing
an impressive n-type conductivity value of up to 11.6 S cm–1 and PF up to 53.4 μW m–1 K–2.[23] To the best of our knowledge, most
of the previous work has focused exclusively on the effects of the
backbones (i.e., the electronic structure) on n-doping of conjugated
polymers, relegating modifications of the pendant groups to empirical
observations about solubility and film formation; pendant groups affect
the processing and packing of conjugated polymers, improving charge
transport.[24,25] However, the interplay between
pendant groups and molecular doping remains poorly understood. A better
understanding of the unique role that pendant groups, particularly
aliphaticchains, play in molecular doping is critical to maximizing
the performance of organic thermoelectrics.Recently, decorating
n-type conjugated polymers with polar glycolether pendant groups has drawn intensive attention for applications
in organic thermoelectrics, as polar side chains promote the solubility
of the dopant in the polymer matrix, thus enhancing the molecular
doping efficiency.[26] Our group reported
an n-type D–A copolymer with a backbone consisting of 2,6-dibromonaphthalene-1,4,5,8-tetracarboxylic
diimide (NDI) and bithiophene (T2) moieties in which the NDI moiety
is functionalized with the glycol ether side chains.[27] The molecular n-doping of this novel D–A copolymer
achieved a 200-fold enhancement of electrical conductivity compared
with analogues bearing aliphatic pendant groups. Giovannitti et al. reported a D–A copolymer with naphthalene
diimide (NDI) and bithiophene (T2) backbone, where both D and A moieties
are functionalized with the glycol ether side chains.[28] This copolymer features a very narrow band gap of 0.7 eV
and a low-lying LUMO level of –4.12 eV and has been used in
n-type organic electrochemical transistors to achieve in operando stability in water. The n-doping of this low-band gap copolymer
has recently been reported by Müller and co-workers.[29] While glycol ether pendant groups are frequently
employed to increase the polarity of films, the impact of their regiochemistry
has not been studied. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of the effects
of both the type and position of pendant groups on n-doping is indeed
needed.This paper describes the influence of the systematic
alteration
of the identity and regiochemistry of nonpolar(izable) and polar(izable)
pendant groups of the D–A copolymer backbone NDI-alt-T2 on molecular doping in thin films. We explored different combinations
of alkyl and glycol ether pendant groups, synthesizing four D–A
copolymers and studying their doping behaviors with varying concentrations
of n-DMBI. We found that polar(izable) chains located
on the D (bithiophene), A (napthalene diimide), or both monomers can
almost equally improve the host/dopant miscibility and significantly
increase the doping efficiency as compared to the baseline case of
alkyl side chains on both. We found a maximum electrical conductivity
of 0.08 S cm–1 and PF of 0.24 μW m–1 K–2 in the doped D–A copolymer with both
monomers functionalized with glycol ether side chains, but that doping
efficiency was influenced more by the relative positions of alkyl
and glycol ether side chains. These changes in electrical properties
were commensurate with large changes to film morphologies as inferred
from atomic force microscope (AFM) topography. Using spatially resolved
absorption spectroscopy (SRAS), we established a relationship between
the topography and the solvation and dispersion of molecular dopants.
Results
and Discussion
The synthetic route and corresponding structures
of the four D–A
copolymers are shown in Scheme . The NDI-based monomers were synthesized and purified according
to the previously reported procedures.[30] The bithiophene moiety was synthesized according to literature procedures
with slight modifications (see the details in the Supporting Information).[31−33] The copolymers were
synthesized by palladium-catalyzed Stille polycondensation of symmetrical
dibromo and distannyl monomers. Full conversion to the respective
polymers occurred after refluxing the degassed polymerization mixture
overnight. Impurities and low-molecular weight fraction were removed
by continuous extraction with hot methanol, followed by hexane and
chloroform in a Soxhlet extractor. The crude polymer was then dissolved,
precipitated into cold methanol, collected by centrifugation, and
dried in vacuo. The structures were then characterized
by 1H NMR and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)
(Figures S1–S8, Supporting Information). The presence of glycol ether side chains was confirmed by the
appearance and enhancement of the C–O–C stretching mode
at 1109–1057 cm–1 in the FT-IR spectra of
the polymers. The intensities of these absorptions increased consistently
with the ratio of the glycol ether side chains. Finally, the relative
molecular weights and polydispersities were determined by high-temperature
gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in trichlorobenzene using a polystyrene
standard. These data are summarized in Table S1.
Scheme 1
Synthetic Routes to the Copolymers and Chemical Structure of n-DMBI
The thermal properties
of the copolymers were evaluated by thermogravimetric
analysis and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The onset of
decomposition (Td) was determined from
the temperature at 5% weight loss occurred. All the copolymers exhibited
excellent thermal stability with Td of
334, 321, 335, and 307 °C for PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG, respectively (Figure S11, Supporting Information). These values of Td are all sufficient for (thermoelectric) device application.
The DSCcurves of PNDI2TEG-T2DO and PNDI2OD-T2DEG show no distinct
exothermal transitions in the second heating cycle, revealing the
absence of significant degrees of crystallinity or phase transition
across the measured temperature range (Figure S12, Supporting Information). For PNDI2OD-T2DO, the DSCcurve shows
a weak exotherm in the second heating cycle, indicative of a melting
transition at 248 °C. However, PNDI2TEG-T2DEG shows three exotherms
at 108, 209, and 274 °C in the second heating cycle and endotherms
at 94, 191, and 253 °C in the first cooling cycle. These results
indicate an increasingly complex thermal behavior commensurate with
the inclusion of glycol etherchains, reflecting the general observation
that pendant glycol ethers have a significant and complex influence
on the morphology of π-conjugated materials and underscoring
the need to investigate their influence in more depth.[33−42]In order to gain insights into the effects of the side chains
on
the electronic structure, we carried out cyclic voltammetry (CV) on
thin films of the polymers. The measurements were performed in acetonitrile
under an inert atmosphere with 0.1 M n-Bu4NPF6, as the supporting electrolyte, a glassy carbon working
electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl pseudo-reference
electrode. Ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) was used as an
internal standard by assigning its half-wave potential an absolute
energy of −5.1 eV versus vacuum.[43] The resulting plots from the first cycle (except
PNDI2OD-T2DEG and PNDI2TEG-2DEG, for which the second reduction waves
were selected) are shown in Figure , and the corresponding data are summarized in Table . All four copolymers
show two quasi-reversible reduction and irreversible oxidation waves.
The reduction waves are indicative of the NDI moiety in the polymer
being reduced sequentially to form the NDI-polymer radical anion in
the first reduction and then the NDI-polymer dianion in the second
reduction. These reduction CV plots are similar to the classicn-type
polymer P(NDI2OD-T2)[44−47] (Figure S14). The valence band (VB) and
conductance band (CB) energy levels of these polymers are calculated
from the onset of oxidation and reduction potentials using the equation EVB = −(5.10 + Eox. onset)eV and ECB = −(5.10
+ Ered. onset) eV, respectively.
The onset oxidation potentials of PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG relative to Fc/Fc+ were 0.30, 0.29,
0.35, and −0.05 V, respectively, which correspond to estimated
VB energies of −5.40, −5.39, −5.45, and −5.05
eV. This trend suggests that the inclusion of glycol ethers has little
effect except when installed on both monomers, in which case it destabilizes
the VB by approximately 400 meV.
Figure 1
Cyclic voltammograms of the NDI-based
conjugated polymer thin films
deposited on the glass carbon working electrode immersed in 0.1 M n-Bu4PF6 acetonitrile solution at
100 mV s–1. All four copolymers show quasi-reversible
reduction and irreversible oxidation waves. Replacing pendant alkyl
chains with polar glycol ethers has little effect on the oxidation
potential, except when installed on both monomers, while the reduction
potential systematically decreases with increasing glycol ether chains.
Table 1
Photophysical Properties and Electrochemical
Properties of NDI-Based Conjugated Polymers
polymer
PNDI2OD-T2DO
PNDI2TEG-T2DO
PNDI2OD-T2DEG
PNDI2TEG-T2DEG
λsol. onset (nm)
967
974
1078
1140
λfilm onset (nm)
1090
1190
1304
1550
red shift (nm)
123
216
226
410
Egopt. (eV)
1.14
1.04
0.95
0.80
EgCV (eV)a
1.36
1.26
1.21
0.75
Eox. onset (eV)
0.30
0.29
0.35
–0.05
Ered. onset (eV)
–1.06
–0.92
–0.91
–0.80
VB (eV)b
–5.40
–5.39
–5.45
–5.05
CB (eV)c
–4.04
–4.18
–4.19
–4.30
Egopt. = 1240/λfilm onset eV.
VB = −(5.10
+ Eox. onset) eV.
CB = −(5.10 + Ered. onset) eV.
Cyclic voltammograms of the NDI-basedconjugated polymer thin films
deposited on the glass carbon working electrode immersed in 0.1 M n-Bu4PF6 acetonitrile solution at
100 mV s–1. All four copolymers show quasi-reversible
reduction and irreversible oxidation waves. Replacing pendant alkylchains with polar glycol ethers has little effect on the oxidation
potential, except when installed on both monomers, while the reduction
potential systematically decreases with increasing glycol etherchains.Egopt. = 1240/λfilm onset eV.VB = −(5.10
+ Eox. onset) eV.CB = −(5.10 + Ered. onset) eV.The onset of the reduction potentials of PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO,
PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG relative to Fc/Fc+ are
−1.06, −0.92, −0.91, and −0.80 V, respectively,
which correspond to estimated CB energies of −4.04, −4.18,
−4.19, and −4.30 eV. The relatively deep CB levels are
the result of the strong electron affinity of the acceptor monomer
(NDI) and indicate that all four copolymers have sufficient driving
force for efficient charge transfer with an n-type dopant. The overall
trend of the CB energies is PNDI2TEG-T2DEG < PNDI2TEG-T2DO = PNDI2OD-T2DEG
< PNDI2OD-T2DO; these results clearly show that replacing pendant
alkyl groups with glycol ethers systematically stabilizes the CB,
suggesting that inductive effects have a significant effect on the
electronic structure.The glycol ether pendant groups may also
tend to drive backbone
crystallization, thus decreasing the difference in the torsional angle
between bithiophene and adjacent NDI in the solid state compared to
the solution, especially for PNDI2TEG-T2DEG, which is why the direct
band transition is so much more red-shifted for the PNDI2TEG-T2DEG
than for the others and why the VB (measured in thin films) shifts
significantly compared to the highest occupied molecular orbital (measured
in solution; see Figure S13 and density functional theory calculations
in Supporting Information). Importantly,
the CV data indicate that manipulating the pendant groups has a significant
(inductive) effect on the electronic structure of the polymers that
is distinct from and additive with morphological effects driven by
the difference in polarity/polarizability of alkyl and glycol etherchains.Figure shows the
UV–vis–NIR absorption spectra for pristine and doped
D–A copolymer thin films. Films of PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO,
PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG show two characteristic absorption
peaks of pristine polymers, which we assign to the π–π*
transition (at around 400 nm) and the broad interband (charge-transfer)
transition (P0, from 850 to 1000 nm).[18,28] We observed
a relative bathochromic shift of the interband transitions for the
copolymers bearing glycol ether groups relative to those bearing alkyl
groups; the optical band gaps of PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG determined from absorption onsets are 1.14, 1.04,
0.95, and 0.80 eV, respectively. The molecular doping of PNDI2OD-T2DO,
PNDI2TEG-T2DO, and PNDI2OD-T2DEGcauses a significant reduction in
the absorptions associated with the pristine polymer and generates
new polaron (P2′) absorptions at approximately 560 nm. The
extent of this reduction can be affected by the doping level, the
effective conjugation length, and the packing of conjugated polymers.[16] Thus, it is difficult to evaluate absolute doping
levels among different D–A copolymers from the changes to the
absorption spectra alone. The doping of PNDI2TEG-T2DO gives rise to
a bathochromic shift in the low-energy absorption onset, which we
ascribe to the overlap of neutral CT absorption and polaron transition
(P2) absorption. However, we did not see the polaron absorption peak
(P1) in the doping of PNDI2TEG-T2DO, which might be due to the mixing
of the newly formed polaron band with the CB. The low-energy absorption
at λ > 1500 nm that appears in dopedPNDI2OD-T2DEG is either
a subgap, P1 polaron absorption, scattering (see the discussion of
film morphology below) or both; a (P1) peak at around 3000 nm (0.41
eV) grows with dopantconcentration, indicating a commensurate increase
in the doping level (see full spectra in Figure S17). Thermodynamically, PNDI2TEG-T2DEG is most prone to be
doped by n-DMBI as it exhibits the lowest CB energy
among the four D–A copolymers. However, the molecular doping
of PNDI2TEG-T2DEG only causes a reduction in the pristine absorbances,
without a commensurate rise in P1 and P2 absorbances. Normalizing
the absorption spectra of pristine PNDI2TEG-T2DEG films reveals a
bathochromic shift in the P0 (pristine inter-band) absorbance with
increasing dopantconcentration, which may be indicative of a P2 transition.
Polaron bands formed by molecular doping tend to have an energy level
lower than the CB or higher than the VB due to the reorganization
energy of the backbones responding to a change in the oxidation state.[48] Thus, polaron features P2 and P1 are visible
in the absorption spectra. For PNDI2TEG-T2DEG, the glycol ether pendant
groups may reduce the reorganization energy, improving the electronic
overlap in the pristine state, which is evident in the broader absorption
between 600 and 1550 nm. In this scenario, the polaron bands would
be too close in energy to the VBs/CBs to produce discrete absorption
peaks. The results of UV–vis–NIR absorption spectra
confirm that the D–A copolymers are doped by n-DMBI, but they do not provide further insights into the absolute
doping efficiencies.
Figure 2
Ultraviolet–visible near infrared (UV–vis–NIR)
absorption spectra of pristine and doped PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO,
PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG films.
Ultraviolet–visible near infrared (UV–vis–NIR)
absorption spectra of pristine and dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO,
PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG films.In order to characterize and compare the thermoelectric properties
of these four copolymers, we checked the electrical conductivity and
the Seebeck coefficient of the dopedconjugated copolymers. The doped
thin films were prepared from mixtures of copolymer and n-DMBI in varied molar fractions in a nitrogen-filled glovebox by
spin coating on glass substrates on which parallel line-shaped gold
electrodes were previously deposited as the bottom contacts, which
were then subjected to thermal annealing at 120 °C for 1 h Figure a shows the electrical
conductivities (σ) of the four doped D–A copolymers at
different doping concentrations. Among the four doped D–A copolymers,
dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO (which has alkyl groups on both monomers) shows
the lowest electrical conductivity with an optimized value of 9.1
± 4.7 × 10–6 S cm–1 at
a doping concentration of 28 mol %. Replacing any one of the alkyl
side chains with a glycol ether side chain leads to an increase in
electrical conductivity; PNDI2TEG-T2DO and PNDI2OD-T2DEG give optimized
electrical conductivities of 7.0 ± 1.2 × 10–4 and 1.9 ± 0.1 × 10–3 S cm–1, respectively, at a doping concentration of 42 mol %. DopedPNDI2TEG-T2DEG
(which has glycol etherchains on both monomers) shows the highest
electrical conductivity of all four copolymers, giving a value of
5.0 ± 2.7 × 10–2 S cm–1 at a doping concentration of 14 mol %. In all cases, the substitution
of an alkylchain by a glycol ether increases the conductivity. These
results indicate that the side chains play an important role in the
n-doping of D–A copolymers, presumably by affecting not only
the packing of the polymerchains but also their interactions with
dopant molecules.
Figure 3
(a) Electrical conductivities, (b) Seebeck coefficients,
and (c)
PF of doped PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG
thin films.
(a) Electrical conductivities, (b) Seebeck coefficients,
and (c)
PF of dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG
thin films.S is determined
by the difference in energy between
the Fermi level (EF) and the charge-transport
level (ET).[49] Typically, as more charges are generated via molecular
doping, EF shifts toward ET and the absolute value of S decreases. Figure b shows the values
of S for the doped D–A copolymers. The resistance
of films of lightly dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO was too large to measure thermal
voltages accurately; thus values of S = −490
± 44 μV K–1 could only be determined
for 28 mol %-doped films. For films of PNDI2TEG-T2DEG, S = −289.8 μV K–1 at a doping concentration
of 7 mol %. The negative sign indicates that the dominant charge carriers
are electrons. At a doping concentration of 42 mol %, S decreases to −119.1 μV K–1, reflecting
the decreasing gap between EF and ET as the
doping level increases; that is, the level of doping increases with
the concentration of the dopant. At a doping concentration of 7 mol
%, films of PNDI2TEG-T2DO and PNDI2OD-T2DEG show similar values of S of −254.5 ± 2.5 and −247 ± 8.6
μV K–1, respectively, which are comparable
to the doped films of PNDI2TEG-T2DEG. The similarity in the magnitude
of S suggests similar doping levels for the films
of PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG at a doping concentration
of 7 mol %; that is, the copolymers bifurcate into two groups, those
bearing only alkylchains and those bearing any number of glycol etherchains. As the doping concentration increases from 7 to 28 mol %,
the absolute values of S for the films of PNDI2OD-T2DO
and PNDI2OD-T2DEG decrease, as expected; however, increasing the doping
concentration from 28 to 56 mol % results in the unusual observation
of the sign of S switching (from negative to positive),
crossing zero near 35 mol %. Interestingly, S goes
to zero at the peak of the electrical conductivity (see Figure a). Sign switching of S has been reported for the electrochemical doping of poly(ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulphonate)
(PEDOT:PSS) and the chemical doping of poly(pyridinium phenylene)
[P(PymPh)] with a strong reducing agent;[49,50] however, in those cases, the polymers are much more heavily doped
than in this work. For both PEDOT:PSS and P(PymPh), the interband
absorption of the pristine polymer is lost completely at the point
of sign switching, leading to electrical conductivities of more than
10 S cm–1. The molecular doping process in our work
is comparatively weaker, as is evident by the slight reduction in
the pristine absorption (Figure ) and lower electrical conductivities of ∼10–3 S cm–1. As such, the mechanism
for the sign switching of S in the D–A copolymers
is different from those reported in previous studies. We hypothesize
that it is because charge transport occurs through doping-induced
gap states, which form below EF and, therefore, have a
contribution to S that is positive in sign irrespective
of the sign of the carriers, similar to the behavior that we have
observed in other molecularly dopedpolymer films.[51]Based on the aforementioned electrical conductivities
and Seebeck
coefficients, we calculated the PFs of the doped films, which are
summarized in Figure c. Films of PNDI2OD-T2DO at a doping concentration of 14 mol % showed
a relatively small PF of 8.6 × 10–6 μW
m–1 K–2 due to its low conductivity.
Films of PNDI2TEG-T2DO and PNDI2OD-T2DEG exhibited slightly high PF
on the order of 10–5 μW m–1 K–2 before the sign switching of S. In contrast, films of PNDI2TEG-T2DEG gave the highest PF, 0.24
μW m–1 K–2. Our results
unambiguously indicate that the n-type thermoelectric performance
scales with the inclusion of glycol ether side chains.Previous
studies have highlighted the importance of the solubility
of the dopant in the host polymer in n-type molecular doping.[10,52] In order to gain insights into this solubility for our D–A
copolymer systems, we characterized the topography of the pristine
and doped films by AFM, the results of which are shown in Figure . Pristine films
of PNDI2OD-T2DO and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG (which have matching pendant groups
on the monomers) show relatively smooth surfaces with root mean square
roughnesses of 5.7 and 4.8 nm, respectively, compared to 2 nm for
pristine PNDI2TEG-T2DO and 10.1 nm for pristine PNDI2OD-T2DEG (which
have mismatched pendant groups). Many factors contribute to the final
film morphology, but the mismatch in polarity/polarizability apparently
drives a self-assembly process[53] in PNDI2OD-T2DEG
that is not present in PNDI2TEG-T2DO (where the positions of the pendant
groups are swapped) and that leads to the petal-shaped nanostructures,
as shown in Figure . While the topology of the films of PNDI2OD-T2DO evolved significantly
with increasing doping concentration, films of PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG showed no obvious change. Small, ovaloid recessions
(shown in black) also appeared on the surface of dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO
with increasing density as more dopant was added. We ascribe the changing
topography to the formation of aggregates, likely caused by the relatively
poor solubility of the dopant in the matrix of the D–A copolymer,
driving phase segregation between the polar/charged dopant and the
apolar pendant groups. Replacing the alkylchains with polar glycoletherchains has a stark influence on the evolution of the topography.
For example, the topography of the dopedPNDI2OD-T2DEG (which has
polar chains on the D monomer) changes very little with doping. In
the films of PNDI2TEG-T2DEG (which has polar chains on both monomers),
the topography remains mostly homogenous, even at a doping concentration
of 42 mol %. We hypothesize that the inclusion of polar chains favors
the formation of charge-transfer species rather than aggregates of
pure dopant phase separating from the polymer.
Figure 4
AFM images of pristine
and doped PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG thin films in a pristine state (0 mol %) and at
various doping concentrations (14, 28, 42 mol %).
AFM images of pristine
and dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG thin films in a pristine state (0 mol %) and at
various doping concentrations (14, 28, 42 mol %).Although the pendant groups have a substantial influence on the
topography, we can only speculate as to what the various features
comprise. Thus, to gain further insights into phase segregation and
dispersal of the dopant in the films, we acquired spatially resolved
absorption spectroscopy (SRAS) images of the 42 mol %-doped films.
The spatial resolution is around 500 nm (optical resolution limit),
resulting in hyperspectral 40 × 40 μm images with 6640
pixels and each pixel corresponding to a full absorption spectrum
(experimental details in Supporting Information). For each sample, we show the averaged absorption spectrum, normalized
to the absorbance at 850 nm, as a thick blue line in Figure a–d. Those averaged
spectra closely reproduce the corresponding ensemble spectra given
in Figure , with the
deviations at 900–1000 nm likely being related to the substantial
drop in detection efficiency in this spectral range.
Figure 5
Spatially resolved absorption
spectra on 42 mol % doped copolymer
films. (a–d) Average spectra (thick blue line) and spectral
variations (blue shaded area); for details, see text. (e–h)
20 × 20 μm maps of the absorption ratio A600/A850.
Spatially resolved absorption
spectra on 42 mol % dopedcopolymer
films. (a–d) Average spectra (thick blue line) and spectral
variations (blue shaded area); for details, see text. (e–h)
20 × 20 μm maps of the absorption ratio A600/A850.For a more detailed analysis, we retrieve from each individual
spectrum in the hyperspectral data sets the ratio A600/A850 of absorbances at
600 and 850 nm. Based on Figure , this ratio serves as a relative measure for the doping
level, and it increases upon doping. The blue shaded areas in Figure a–d represent
the variation in A600/A850 that was found on each sample. The upper (lower) limit
of this area was constructed by averaging the percentile of spectra
that showed the highest (lowest) ratio A600/A850. We found that the spectral variation
is largest for PNDI2OD-T2DEG (Figure c), intermediate for PNDI2TEG-T2DO (Figure b), and small for PNDI2OD-T2OD
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG (Figure a,d). Given that this ratio is a measure for the relative
doping efficiency, these data indicate that on length scales of the
optical resolution, there are significant local variations in doping
efficiency for PNDI2OD-T2DEG. For PNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2OD, and
PNDI2TEG-T2DEG, these local variations are less pronounced. That is,
the less pronounced those spectral variations, the more evenly distributed
the doping levels and, by extension, the dopant are. We note that
the spectral variation in pristine (undoped) PNDI2TOD-T2DEG films
is relatively small due to the absence of the dopant (Figure S20).The spatial variation of the
doping level is visualized in Figure e–h, which
displays 20 × 20 μm heat maps of the ratio A650/A850. For PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
we detect variations on the length scale of several μm, while
for PNDITEG-T2DO and particularly for PNDI2OD-T2OD and PNDI2TED-T2DEG,
those variations are increasingly less visible. These observations
nicely agree with feature sizes in the AFM images (Figure ). Thus, we believe that the
spatial variation of doping levels is directly linked to the presence
of large aggregates, with doping levels depending not only on the
chemical structure of the copolymer but also on its local molecular
packing, which is highly sensitive to the regiochemistry of the pendant
groups.From the AFM and SRAS data, we conclude that the polar
pendant
groups promote the dissolution of the polar/ionized dopant in the
polymer matrix, although with sometimes significant spatial variation,
and that the regiochemistry of the chains has a significant impact
on the organization and self-assembly of the pristine and doped films.In our previous work, we measured the carrier density (n) of films of doped organic semiconductors directly by
using admittance spectroscopy on a metal–insulator–semiconductor
device with an ion gel insulating layer (PVDF-HFP:[EMIM][TFSI] blend).[27] The composition of the ion gel was carefully
optimized to achieve a capacitance of around 3 μF cm–2 and sufficient mechanical robustness to withstand the sequential
coating of the active layer. The capacitance versus DC voltage plot of the four doped D–A copolymers (28 mol
%) is shown in Figure S18. Based on the
Mott–Schottky analysis (see the experimental methods), the
carrier densities in the four 28%-doped D–A copolymers were
extracted (the top panel of Figure ). The dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO yielded a carrier density
of 7.9 × 1017 cm–3, the lowest of
the series. In contrast, films of dopedPNDI2TEG-T2DO, PNDI2OD-T2DEG,
and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG exhibited much higher carrier densities of 3.2
× 1019, 6.9 × 1019, and 3.3 ×
1019 cm–3, respectively, translating
to respective doping efficiencies of 14, 31, and 14% (assuming the
total site density of N = 8 × 1020 cm–3). These densities are more than 40 times
greater than for PNDI2OD-T2DO, further confirming the effectiveness
of glycol etherchains in molecular n-doping of D–A copolymers.
Here again, however, regiochemistry and not just the presence or absence
of glycol etherchains matters; films of PNDI2OD-T2DEG gave 31% doping
efficiency, which is double that of PNDI2TEG-T2DEG.
Figure 6
Carrier density (top
panel), doping efficiency (middle panel),
and mobility (bottom panel) of 28 mol %-doped PNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO,
PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG thin films.
Carrier density (top
panel), doping efficiency (middle panel),
and mobility (bottom panel) of 28 mol %-dopedPNDI2OD-T2DO, PNDI2TEG-T2DO,
PNDI2OD-T2DEG, and PNDI2TEG-T2DEG thin films.This observation cannot be explained by a simple relationship between
the number or volume fraction of polar(izable) chains and the host/dopant
miscibility, as PNDI2OD-T2DEG has one fewer glycol etherchain than
PNDI2TEG-T2DEG. Rather, we hypothesize that the unusual morphology
observed by AFM is the result of the specific regiochemistry and is
a manifestation of self-assembly at the polymerdopant scale. It is
well established that, by design, the unoccupied molecular orbitals
of D–A copolymer tend to be localized on the acceptor monomer,
which in this case is an NDI moiety.[54] The
glycol etherchains of PNDI2OD-T2DEG are attached to the electron-rich
(donor) bithiophene moiety. It is, therefore, reasonable to assume
that the ionized dopant molecules would be, on average, closer to
bithiophene than to the NDI moiety both because of the cationic nature
of the dopant and the highly polar glycol etherchains; that is, if
the polymerchains pack to create lipophilic domains of alkyl groups,
dopant molecules will prefer the commensurate glycol ether phase.
Recently, we reported that glycol ether pendant groups effectively
control how dopant molecules incorporate into a host conjugated polymer
matrix, leading to a negligible effect on the π–π
packing but increased doping efficiency and PF.[27,55] Salzmann et al. suggested a way to increase doping
efficiency by sterically blocking the dopant from interacting with
unoccupied molecular orbitals, thus preventing strong electronic overlap
(or localized charge-transfer).[3] We postulate
that the disparate polarities of the pendant groups accomplish exactly
that, by providing a thermodynamic driving force to associate with
the bithiophene rather than the NDI, thus causing an improved doping
efficiency in the dopedPNDI2OD-T2DEG, though with significant spatial
variations (Figure c,g) driven by the self-assembly of the polymerchains. This driving
force would likely require sufficient ordering in the solid state
to create disparate hydrophobic and hydrophilic microenvironments via interpolymer interactions. Such ordering is plausible,
given the rigidity and tendency of NDI to π-stack, the bulk
of the branched alkylchains, the preference for bithiophene to adopt
an anticonfiguration, and the pronounced impact glycol etherchains
have on morphology.[19,30,35,36,43,45] The optical spectra (Figure c and some extent Figure c) further support this hypothesis, exhibiting
strong evidence of π-stacking of the NDI due to the shape of
the π–π* transition, which changes quite strongly
in a characteristic way. While direct evidence of such ordering is
not possible, the AFM images reveal a substantially different topography
on a very different length scale in the films of PNDI2OD-T2DEG as
compared to the other D–A copolymers, which is a strong indication
of different packing.Based on the measured values of electrical
conductivity and carrier
density, the bulk mobility values of films of the D–A copolymers
were 7.2 × 10–5, 3.8 × 10–5, 1.5 × 10–4, and 3.5 × 10–3 cm2 (V s)−1, respectively. The trend
diverges from previous observations that glycol ether side chains
cause mobilities to decrease;[27,28] PNDI2TEG-T2DEG has
both the highest mobility and the highest fraction of glycol ethers.
This observation suggests that functionalization of the bithiophene
units counteracts any negative impacts that glycol ethers might otherwise
have on the ability of the polymerchains to pack and further underscores
the importance of not just the identity but also the regiochemistry
of side chains in molecularly doped films of conjugated polymers.
Conclusions
The design rules for conjugated polymers that operate while doped
must cope with the added complexity that the incorporation of dopants
brings. Particularly for n-type polymers, which must be dopable by
reducing agents that are sufficiently (air) stable to process. We
investigated the influence of the identity and regiochemistry of side
chains on molecular doping with n-DMBI by synthesizing
and characterizing four different combinations of polar(izable), glycolether, and alkyl pendant groups on an NDI-bithiophene D–A copolymer
backbone and measuring their properties at different doping levels.
Surprisingly, despite being attached via ether linkages,
the primary electronic effect of the addition of glycol ether was
to increase electron affinity while, at the same time, increasing
the solubility of (ionized) n-DMBI dopant molecules
in the film, leading to a factor of 40 increase in doping efficiency
and an optimized conductivity of 0.08 S cm–1 in
the polymer with all glycol ether pendant groups. Surprisingly, maximum
doping efficiency was not commensurate with the increased volume fraction
of glycol etherchains. Rather, the combination of the identity and
regiochemistry of the side chains produced the highest carrier density
and doping efficiency. Spatially resolved absorption spectra revealed
a correlation between doping efficiency and AFM topology, from which
we concluded that the combination of alkylchains on the acceptor
and glycol etherchains on the donor drive the dopant molecules to
associate with the donor, minimizing the unwanted electronic overlap
between the dopant and unoccupied molecular orbitals. While a further
study on the wider scope of backbones and pendant groups is needed
to develop consistent design rules, particularly with respect to self-assembly
driving large morphological changes, this work highlights an important
design principle that must be taken into account for the future design
of conjugated polymers optimized for molecular doping.
Authors: Jian Liu; Li Qiu; Riccardo Alessandri; Xinkai Qiu; Giuseppe Portale; JingJin Dong; Wytse Talsma; Gang Ye; Aprizal Akbar Sengrian; Paulo C T Souza; Maria Antonietta Loi; Ryan C Chiechi; Siewert J Marrink; Jan C Hummelen; L Jan Anton Koster Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Guanghao Lu; James Blakesley; Scott Himmelberger; Patrick Pingel; Johannes Frisch; Ingo Lieberwirth; Ingo Salzmann; Martin Oehzelt; Riccardo Di Pietro; Alberto Salleo; Norbert Koch; Dieter Neher Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Shrayesh N Patel; Anne M Glaudell; Kelly A Peterson; Elayne M Thomas; Kathryn A O'Hara; Eunhee Lim; Michael L Chabinyc Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Adam Marks; Xingxing Chen; Ruiheng Wu; Reem B Rashid; Wenlong Jin; Bryan D Paulsen; Maximilian Moser; Xudong Ji; Sophie Griggs; Dilara Meli; Xiaocui Wu; Helen Bristow; Joseph Strzalka; Nicola Gasparini; Giovanni Costantini; Simone Fabiano; Jonathan Rivnay; Iain McCulloch Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 16.383