I Ibrahim1,2, R Macatangay3,4, C Y Chai3,4, C M Khoo5,6, M Mahadevan3,4. 1. Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Level 4 National University Centre of Oral Health, 9 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119085, Singapore. irwani_ibrahim@nuhs.edu.sg. 2. Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore. irwani_ibrahim@nuhs.edu.sg. 3. Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Level 4 National University Centre of Oral Health, 9 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119085, Singapore. 4. Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated hyperglycaemia is a common presentation in the emergency department (ED). Rapid glucose control is associated with the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycaemia. We sought to determine the safety of a rapid glucose control protocol delivered in a 24-h emergency department observation unit (OU). METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the OU for hyperglycaemia where the assessing clinician deemed there was no other reason for medical admission apart from hyperglycaemia; and that the patient could be safely discharged provided their hyperglycaemia was adequately treated. The rapid glucose control protocol consists of 4-6 hourly glucose monitoring and insulin injections according to a sliding scale. We report the demographics, reduction in glucose values and the incidence of hypoglycaemia in the OU. We also determine the rate of discharge from OU and the rate of hospital admission at 30 days. RESULTS: We included 101 patients. The mean age was 53.5 years (95% CI 50.4-56.6) and 64% of patients were male. The mean HbA1c value was 12.8% (95% CI 12.3-13.3). The mean admission and discharge glucose values were 27.2 (95% CI 26.3-28.1) and 13.9 (95% CI 13.2-14.6) mmols/l respectively. There was no incidence of hypoglycaemia in the OU. We successfully discharged 90.1% of the patients from the OU, of which 3 (3.3%) patients were admitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. CONCLUSION: ED OU is a safe location to deliver effective management for patients presented with uncomplicated severe hyperglycaemia.
BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated hyperglycaemia is a common presentation in the emergency department (ED). Rapid glucose control is associated with the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycaemia. We sought to determine the safety of a rapid glucose control protocol delivered in a 24-h emergency department observation unit (OU). METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the OU for hyperglycaemia where the assessing clinician deemed there was no other reason for medical admission apart from hyperglycaemia; and that the patient could be safely discharged provided their hyperglycaemia was adequately treated. The rapid glucose control protocol consists of 4-6 hourly glucose monitoring and insulin injections according to a sliding scale. We report the demographics, reduction in glucose values and the incidence of hypoglycaemia in the OU. We also determine the rate of discharge from OU and the rate of hospital admission at 30 days. RESULTS: We included 101 patients. The mean age was 53.5 years (95% CI 50.4-56.6) and 64% of patients were male. The mean HbA1c value was 12.8% (95% CI 12.3-13.3). The mean admission and discharge glucose values were 27.2 (95% CI 26.3-28.1) and 13.9 (95% CI 13.2-14.6) mmols/l respectively. There was no incidence of hypoglycaemia in the OU. We successfully discharged 90.1% of the patients from the OU, of which 3 (3.3%) patients were admitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. CONCLUSION: ED OU is a safe location to deliver effective management for patients presented with uncomplicated severe hyperglycaemia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus; Hyperglycaemia; Hypoglycaemia; Observation unit
Authors: Michael A Ross; Scott Compton; Daniel Richardson; Ryan Jones; Tara Nittis; Andrew Wilson Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Michael A Ross; Jason M Hockenberry; Ryan Mutter; Marguerite Barrett; Matthew Wheatley; Stephen R Pitts Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: M J Sampson; T Crowle; K Dhatariya; N Dozio; R H Greenwood; P J Heyburn; C Jones; R C Temple; E Walden Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Colin J Crilly; Amy J Allen; Teresa M Amato; Allison Tiberio; Rifka C Schulman; Robert A Silverman Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 2.469