BACKGROUND: COVID-19 public health restrictions have affected end-of-life care experiences for dying patients and their families. AIM: To explore bereaved relatives' experiences of quality of care and family support provided during the last days of life; to identify the impact of factors associated with perceived support. DESIGN: A national, observational, open online survey was developed and disseminated via social media, public fora and professional networks (June-September 2020). Validated instruments and purposively designed questions assessed experiences. Analysis used descriptive statistics, logistic regression and thematic analysis of free-text responses. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (⩾18 years) who had experienced the death of a relative/friend (all care settings) within the United Kingdome during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 278, mean 53.4 years) tended to be female (n = 216, 78%); over half were 'son/daughter' (174, 62.6%) to the deceased. Deceased individuals (mean 81.6 years) most frequently died in their 'usual place of care' (n = 192, 69.3%). Analysis established five conceptual themes affecting individualised care: (1) public health restrictions compounding the distress of 'not knowing'; (2) disparate views about support from doctors and nurses; (3) challenges in communication and level of preparedness for the death; (4) delivery of compassionate care; (5) emotional needs and potential impact on grief. Male respondents (OR 2.9, p = 0.03) and those able to visit (OR 2.2, p = 0.04) were independently associated with good perceptions of family support. CONCLUSION: Despite public health restrictions, individualised care can be enabled by proactive, informative communication; recognising dying in a timely manner and facilitating the ability to be present before death.
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 public health restrictions have affected end-of-life care experiences for dying patients and their families. AIM: To explore bereaved relatives' experiences of quality of care and family support provided during the last days of life; to identify the impact of factors associated with perceived support. DESIGN: A national, observational, open online survey was developed and disseminated via social media, public fora and professional networks (June-September 2020). Validated instruments and purposively designed questions assessed experiences. Analysis used descriptive statistics, logistic regression and thematic analysis of free-text responses. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (⩾18 years) who had experienced the death of a relative/friend (all care settings) within the United Kingdome during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 278, mean 53.4 years) tended to be female (n = 216, 78%); over half were 'son/daughter' (174, 62.6%) to the deceased. Deceased individuals (mean 81.6 years) most frequently died in their 'usual place of care' (n = 192, 69.3%). Analysis established five conceptual themes affecting individualised care: (1) public health restrictions compounding the distress of 'not knowing'; (2) disparate views about support from doctors and nurses; (3) challenges in communication and level of preparedness for the death; (4) delivery of compassionate care; (5) emotional needs and potential impact on grief. Male respondents (OR 2.9, p = 0.03) and those able to visit (OR 2.2, p = 0.04) were independently associated with good perceptions of family support. CONCLUSION: Despite public health restrictions, individualised care can be enabled by proactive, informative communication; recognising dying in a timely manner and facilitating the ability to be present before death.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; bereavement; death; end of life; family; palliative care; survey
Authors: Lucy Ellen Selman; Djj Farnell; M Longo; S Goss; K Seddon; A Torrens-Burton; C R Mayland; D Wakefield; B Johnston; A Byrne; E Harrop Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Yvonne N Becqué; Wendy van der Geugten; Agnes van der Heide; Ida J Korfage; H Roeline W Pasman; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Masha Zee; Erica Witkamp; Anne Goossensen Journal: Scand J Caring Sci Date: 2021-10-09
Authors: Karlotta Schloesser; Steffen T Simon; Berenike Pauli; Raymond Voltz; Norma Jung; Charlotte Leisse; Agnes van der Heide; Ida J Korfage; Anne Pralong; Claudia Bausewein; Melanie Joshi; Julia Strupp Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Berivan Yildiz; Ida J Korfage; Erica Fe Witkamp; Anne Goossensen; Liza Gg van Lent; H Roeline Pasman; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Masha Zee; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Brittany Dennis; Meredith Vanstone; Marilyn Swinton; Daniel Brandt Vegas; Joanna C Dionne; Andrew Cheung; France J Clarke; Neala Hoad; Anne Boyle; Jessica Huynh; Feli Toledo; Mark Soth; Thanh H Neville; Kirsten Fiest; Deborah J Cook Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 2.692