Literature DB >> 34052977

Does chest shape influence exercise stress echocardiographic results in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?

Andrea Sonaglioni1, Gian Luigi Nicolosi2, Elisabetta Rigamonti3, Michele Lombardo3, Gian Franco Gensini3, Giuseppe Ambrosio4.   

Abstract

Despite the good specificity of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), false positive (FP) results may occur. We have previously reported that chest abnormalities may affect parameters of cardiac contractility. The influence of chest shape on ESE results has never been previously investigated. We retrospectively analyzed 160 consecutive patients (64.4 ± 13.0-year old, 91 women) who had undergone coronary angiography at our Institution because of positive ESE, between June 2014 and May 2020. Modified Haller index (MHI; chest transverse diameter over the distance between sternum and spine) was assessed in all patients. Obstructive CAD was diagnosed by ≥ 70% stenosis in any epicardial coronary artery. Outcome was false-positivity at ESE. 80.6% of patients were diagnosed with obstructive CAD, while 19.4% had no CAD (FP). We separately analyzed patients with normal chest shape (MHI ≤ 2.5) and those with concave-shaped chest wall (MHI > 2.5). These latter were mostly women with small cardiac chambers, mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and exercise-induced ST-segment changes. Likelihood of false-positivity was significantly higher in subjects with MHI > 2.5 than those with MHI ≤ 2.5 (30.7% vs 9.4%, p = 0.001). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, MHI > 2.5 (OR 4.04, 95%CI 1.45-11.2, p = 0.007), MVP (OR 3.47, 95%CI 1.32-9-12, p = 0.01) and dyssynergy in the left circumflex territory (OR = 3.35, 95%CI 1.26-8.93, p = 0.01) were independently associated with false-positivity. Concave-shaped chest wall (MHI > 2.5) may be associated with false-positive stress echocardiographic result. Mechanisms underpinning this finding need to be further explored.
© 2021. Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Exercise stress echocardiography; False positive result; Haller index

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34052977     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02773-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  41 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography?

Authors:  A F L Schinkel; J J Bax; M L Geleijnse; E Boersma; A Elhendy; J R T C Roelandt; D Poldermans
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Optimal non-invasive imaging test selection for the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Exercise echocardiography.

Authors:  T Ryan; H Feigenbaum
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-06-18       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Louise D Metz; Mary Beattie; Robert Hom; Rita F Redberg; Deborah Grady; Kirsten E Fleischmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Kirsten E Fleischmann; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Stress echocardiography from 1979 to present.

Authors:  William F Armstrong; Thomas Ryan
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; William Wijns; Antti Saraste; Davide Capodanno; Emanuele Barbato; Christian Funck-Brentano; Eva Prescott; Robert F Storey; Christi Deaton; Thomas Cuisset; Stefan Agewall; Kenneth Dickstein; Thor Edvardsen; Javier Escaned; Bernard J Gersh; Pavel Svitil; Martine Gilard; David Hasdai; Robert Hatala; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Masip; Claudio Muneretto; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Achenbach; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Guidelines for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease: From the American Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Adelaide Arruda-Olson; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ming Hui Chen; Jane E Marshall; Thomas R Porter; Stephen G Sawada
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests.

Authors:  B D Beleslin; M Ostojic; J Stepanovic; A Djordjevic-Dikic; S Stojkovic; M Nedeljkovic; G Stankovic; Z Petrasinovic; L Gojkovic; Z Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Clinical and economic impact of exercise electrocardiography and exercise echocardiography in clinical practice.

Authors:  T H Marwick; L Shaw; C Case; C Vasey; J D Thomas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Chest Wall Conformation on the Outcome of Primary Mitral Regurgitation due to Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Authors:  Andrea Sonaglioni; Gian Luigi Nicolosi; Elisabetta Rigamonti; Michele Lombardo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2022-04-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.