Literature DB >> 34052016

Uncertainty quantification in skin cancer classification using three-way decision-based Bayesian deep learning.

Moloud Abdar1, Maryam Samami2, Sajjad Dehghani Mahmoodabad3, Thang Doan4, Bogdan Mazoure4, Reza Hashemifesharaki5, Li Liu6, Abbas Khosravi7, U Rajendra Acharya8, Vladimir Makarenkov9, Saeid Nahavandi7.   

Abstract

Accurate automated medical image recognition, including classification and segmentation, is one of the most challenging tasks in medical image analysis. Recently, deep learning methods have achieved remarkable success in medical image classification and segmentation, clearly becoming the state-of-the-art methods. However, most of these methods are unable to provide uncertainty quantification (UQ) for their output, often being overconfident, which can lead to disastrous consequences. Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL) methods can be used to quantify uncertainty of traditional deep learning methods, and thus address this issue. We apply three uncertainty quantification methods to deal with uncertainty during skin cancer image classification. They are as follows: Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, Ensemble MC (EMC) dropout and Deep Ensemble (DE). To further resolve the remaining uncertainty after applying the MC, EMC and DE methods, we describe a novel hybrid dynamic BDL model, taking into account uncertainty, based on the Three-Way Decision (TWD) theory. The proposed dynamic model enables us to use different UQ methods and different deep neural networks in distinct classification phases. So, the elements of each phase can be adjusted according to the dataset under consideration. In this study, two best UQ methods (i.e., DE and EMC) are applied in two classification phases (the first and second phases) to analyze two well-known skin cancer datasets, preventing one from making overconfident decisions when it comes to diagnosing the disease. The accuracy and the F1-score of our final solution are, respectively, 88.95% and 89.00% for the first dataset, and 90.96% and 91.00% for the second dataset. Our results suggest that the proposed TWDBDL model can be used effectively at different stages of medical image analysis.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian deep learning; Deep learning; Medical image classification; Monte Carlo dropout; Skin cancer; Uncertainty quantification (UQ)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34052016     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  9 in total

1.  Deep Bayesian Unsupervised Lifelong Learning.

Authors:  Tingting Zhao; Zifeng Wang; Aria Masoomi; Jennifer Dy
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  DUNEScan: a web server for uncertainty estimation in skin cancer detection with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Bogdan Mazoure; Alexander Mazoure; Jocelyn Bédard; Vladimir Makarenkov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Supervised and weakly supervised deep learning models for COVID-19 CT diagnosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Haseeb Hassan; Zhaoyu Ren; Chengmin Zhou; Muazzam A Khan; Yi Pan; Jian Zhao; Bingding Huang
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 4.  Uncertainty Estimation in Medical Image Classification: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander Kurz; Katja Hauser; Hendrik Alexander Mehrtens; Eva Krieghoff-Henning; Achim Hekler; Jakob Nikolas Kather; Stefan Fröhling; Christof von Kalle; Titus Josef Brinker
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 5.  Skin Cancer Classification With Deep Learning: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yinhao Wu; Bin Chen; An Zeng; Dan Pan; Ruixuan Wang; Shen Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Towards Reliable Parameter Extraction in MEMS Final Module Testing Using Bayesian Inference.

Authors:  Monika E Heringhaus; Yi Zhang; André Zimmermann; Lars Mikelsons
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  SCDNet: A Deep Learning-Based Framework for the Multiclassification of Skin Cancer Using Dermoscopy Images.

Authors:  Ahmad Naeem; Tayyaba Anees; Makhmoor Fiza; Rizwan Ali Naqvi; Seung-Won Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  An Enhanced Transfer Learning Based Classification for Diagnosis of Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Vatsala Anand; Sheifali Gupta; Ayman Altameem; Soumya Ranjan Nayak; Ramesh Chandra Poonia; Abdul Khader Jilani Saudagar
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 9.  Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection.

Authors:  Khoa A Tran; Olga Kondrashova; Andrew Bradley; Elizabeth D Williams; John V Pearson; Nicola Waddell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 11.117

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.