Literature DB >> 34050498

Protein Structure Prediction: Conventional and Deep Learning Perspectives.

V A Jisna1, P B Jayaraj2.   

Abstract

Protein structure prediction is a way to bridge the sequence-structure gap, one of the main challenges in computational biology and chemistry. Predicting any protein's accurate structure is of paramount importance for the scientific community, as these structures govern their function. Moreover, this is one of the complicated optimization problems that computational biologists have ever faced. Experimental protein structure determination methods include X-ray crystallography, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Electron Microscopy. All of these are tedious and time-consuming procedures that require expertise. To make the process less cumbersome, scientists use predictive tools as part of computational methods, using data consolidated in the protein repositories. In recent years, machine learning approaches have raised the interest of the structure prediction community. Most of the machine learning approaches for protein structure prediction are centred on co-evolution based methods. The accuracy of these approaches depends on the number of homologous protein sequences available in the databases. The prediction problem becomes challenging for many proteins, especially those without enough sequence homologs. Deep learning methods allow for the extraction of intricate features from protein sequence data without making any intuitions. Accurately predicted protein structures are employed for drug discovery, antibody designs, understanding protein-protein interactions, and interactions with other molecules. This article provides a review of conventional and deep learning approaches in protein structure prediction. We conclude this review by outlining a few publicly available datasets and deep learning architectures currently employed for protein structure prediction tasks.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ab-initio; CNN; Deep learning; Fragment-based approaches; Homology modeling; LSTM; Protein structure prediction; Proteins; Self-supervised learning; Template-based modeling; Tertiary structure; Threading; Transformers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050498     DOI: 10.1007/s10930-021-10003-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein J        ISSN: 1572-3887            Impact factor:   2.371


  48 in total

1.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Capitation in mental health: potentials and cautions.

Authors:  D Mechanic; L H Aiken
Journal:  New Dir Ment Health Serv       Date:  1989

Review 3.  Self-immunity and the autoimmune network: a molecular perspective to ontogeny and regulation of the immune system.

Authors:  M Zanetti
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur Immunol       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

4.  Driving cancer dose-response modeling with data, not assumptions.

Authors:  R L Sielken
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  15 Alpha-hydroxyestrogen N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase activity in human adult liver.

Authors:  H Jirku; M Levitz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Half-normal adenylate kinase activity in three generations.

Authors:  J D Singer; D J Brock
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  [Case of simultaneous tumors of the stomach with differing histogenesis].

Authors:  S A Geshelin
Journal:  Klin Khir       Date:  1984-10

8.  Mighty T's.

Authors:  J I Martinez-Lopez
Journal:  J La State Med Soc       Date:  1981-11

9.  T cell receptor-mediated negative selection of autoreactive T lymphocyte precursors occurs after commitment to the CD4 or CD8 lineages.

Authors:  C J Guidos; J S Danska; C G Fathman; I L Weissman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Development of a radioimmunoassay for RX77368 (pGlu-His-3,3-dimethyl proline amide)--a stable analogue of thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH).

Authors:  A G Lynn; G W Bennett
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.935

View more
  5 in total

1.  RNA Cleavage Properties of Nucleobase-Specific RNase MC1 and Cusativin Are Determined by the Dinucleotide-Binding Interactions in the Enzyme-Active Site.

Authors:  Priti Thakur; Jowad Atway; Patrick A Limbach; Balasubrahmanyam Addepalli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Molecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interactions in the System Formed by Glargine, Its Metabolite M1, the Insulin Receptor, and the IGF1 Receptor.

Authors:  Margarita González-Beltrán; Claudio Gómez-Alegría
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2021-09-23

3.  The Possible Mechanism of Amyloid Transformation Based on the Geometrical Parameters of Early-Stage Intermediate in Silico Model for Protein Folding.

Authors:  Irena Roterman; Katarzyna Stapor; Dawid Dułak; Leszek Konieczny
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Mutation-Specific Differences in Kv7.1 (KCNQ1) and Kv11.1 (KCNH2) Channel Dysfunction and Long QT Syndrome Phenotypes.

Authors:  Peter M Kekenes-Huskey; Don E Burgess; Bin Sun; Daniel C Bartos; Ezekiel R Rozmus; Corey L Anderson; Craig T January; Lee L Eckhardt; Brian P Delisle
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Boosts RAS Inhibitor Discovery.

Authors:  Ge Wang; Yuhao Bai; Jiarui Cui; Zirui Zong; Yuan Gao; Zhen Zheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.