| Literature DB >> 34050405 |
Christian Linz1,2, Roman C Brands1,2, Olivia Kertels2,3, Alexander Dierks2,4,5, Joachim Brumberg2,4,6, Elena Gerhard-Hartmann2,7, Stefan Hartmann1, Andreas Schirbel2,4, Sebastian Serfling2,4, Yingjun Zhi8, Andreas K Buck2,4, Alexander Kübler1,2, Julian Hohm1, Constantin Lapa9,10,11, Malte Kircher2,4,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: While [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) is the standard for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), diagnostic specificity is hampered by uptake in inflammatory cells such as neutrophils or macrophages. Recently, molecular imaging probes targeting fibroblast activation protein α (FAP), which is overexpressed in a variety of cancer-associated fibroblasts, have become available and might constitute a feasible alternative to FDG PET/CT.Entities:
Keywords: Fibroblast activation protein; Head and neck cancer; Molecular imaging; PET
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34050405 PMCID: PMC8484183 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05422-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Patients’ characteristics
| Pat # | Age | Sex | Primary Tumor | Lymph nodes | Distant Mets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Side | Size [mm] | Osseous arrosion /infiltration | T-Stage | Resected | Mets | N-Stage | M-Stage | ||||
| 1 | 64 | M | alveolar process of the mandible | bilateral | 15 | yes | 2 | 59 | 4 | 3b | none | 0 |
| 2 | 54 | M | floor of the mouth | right | 42 | yes | 3 | 50 | 3 | 3b | none | 0 |
| 3 | 66 | M | floor of the mouth | bilateral | 32 | no | 2 | 36 | 0 | 0 | none | 0 |
| 4 | 49 | M | floor of the mouth | right | 34 | no | 2 | 53 | 1 | 1 | none | 0 |
| 5 | 56 | F | tongue | right | 46 | no | 3 | 47 | 1 | 2a | none | 0 |
| 6 | 60 | M | floor of the mouth | right | 21 | no | 2 | 23 | 0 | 0 | none | 0 |
| 7 | 58 | M | floor of the mouth | bilateral | 27 | yes | 4 | 49 | 1 | 2a | none | 0 |
| 8 | 80 | F | maxillary mucosa | right | 42 | yes | 4 | 46 | 4 | 2b | none | 0 |
| 9 | 62 | M | tongue | right | 13 | no | 2 | 14 | 0 | 0 | none | 0 |
| 10 | 72 | M | alveolar process of the mandible | right | 11 | yes | 4 | 57 | 2 | 3b | none | 0 |
F, female; LN, lymph node; Mets, metastases; M, male; Pat, patient
Individual PET results and immunohistochemical FAP expression of lymph node metastases
| Pat# | LN [Mets/resected] | Location [Side / Level] | Size [mm] | [18F]FDG PET | FAP-directed PET | IHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUVmax | SUVpeak | SUVmax | SUVpeak | FAP CAF | ||||
| 1 | 4 / 59 | R / Ib | 11 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 2 + |
| R / Ia | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 + | ||
| L / Ia | 2 | 3 | 2 | n/d | n/d | 3 + | ||
| L / Ib | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 + | ||
| 2 | 3 / 50 | R / Ib | 11 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 + |
| R / Ib | 9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 + | ||
| R / IIa | 12 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 + | ||
| 3 | 0 / 36 | |||||||
| 4 | 1 / 53 | R / IIa | 5 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | 2 + |
| 5 | 1 / 47 | R / IIa | 43 | 21 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 2 + |
| 6 | 0 / 23 | |||||||
| 7 | 1 / 49 | R / Ib | 9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 + |
| 8 | 4 / 46 | R / Ib | 22 | 34 | 17 | 20 | 11 | 3 + |
| R / Ib | 5 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | 2 + | ||
| R / IIa | 8 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 1 + | ||
| R / IIb | 8 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 2 + | ||
| 9 | 0 / 14 | |||||||
| 10 | 2 / 57 | R / Ib | 12 | 41 | 25 | 20 | 14 | 3 + |
| R / IIa | 15 | 29 | 12 | 25 | 9 | 2 + | ||
CAF, cancer-associated fibroblasts; FAP, fibroblast activation protein; IHC, immunohistochemistry; L, left; n/d, not detected; R, right; LN, lymph node; Mets, metastases; SUV, standardized uptake value
Fig. 1Example of FAP-directed imaging and respective immunohistochemistry of both primary tumor and cervical lymph node metastasis in a patient with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve oral squamous cell carcinoma. Computed tomography (CT, A), fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-directed positron emission tomography (PET, B) as well as hybrid PET/CT imaging (C) in a patient with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve squamous cell carcinoma of the alveolar process of the mandible (patient #1) depicts both the primary tumor as well as an adjacent cervical lymph node metastasis (arrows). Histological work-up (D-G) including immunohistochemistry for FAP (F, G) could confirm presence of FAP-positive disease in both instances (primary tumor: D, F; lymph node metastasis: E, G)
Fig. 2Comparison of [18F]FDG and FAP-directed [68 Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT in a patient with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve oral squamous cell carcinoma and a cervical lymph node metastasis. Maximum Intensity Projections (MIP, outer columns) as well as axial PET (top), fused PET/CT (middle) and CT (bottom) slices of [18F]FDG (left) and [68 Ga]FAPI 04 (right) PET scans in a patient with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve squamous cell carcinoma of the alveolar process of the mandible (patient #1). Whereas both tracers detect the regional lymph node metastasis in cervical level Ib, FAP-directed imaging offers higher tracer uptake. Of note, neither tonsils nor other lymph nodes are [68 Ga]FAPI-04 PET-positive in this example
Results of N-Staging according to [18F]FDG PET/CT, [68 Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT and MR imaging
| Histo | [18F]FDG PET/CT | [68 Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT | MRI | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat # | LN (Mets/total) | TP | FP | TN | FN | Effect on N-Staging | TP | FP | TN | FN | Effect on N-Staging | TP | FP | TN | FN | Effect on N-Staging |
| 1 | 4 / 59 | 4 | 0 | 55 | 0 | → | 3 | 0 | 55 | 1 | → | 1 | 0 | 55 | 3 | ↓ |
| 2 | 3 / 50 | 3 | 1 | 46 | 0 | → | 3 | 0 | 47 | 0 | → | 3 | 2 | 45 | 0 | → |
| 3 | 0 / 36 | - | 0 | 36 | - | → | - | 0 | 36 | - | → | - | 0 | 36 | - | → |
| 4 | 1 / 53 | 0 | 1 | 51 | 1 | → * | 0 | 0 | 52 | 1 | ↓ | 0 | 1 | 51 | 1 | → * |
| 5 | 1 / 47 | 1 | 0 | 44 | 0 | → | 1 | 1 | 45 | 0 | → | 1 | 1 | 45 | 0 | ↑ |
| 6 | 0 / 23 | - | 1 | 22 | - | ↑ | - | 0 | 23 | - | → | - | 0 | 23 | - | → |
| 7 | 1 / 49 | 1 | 0 | 48 | 0 | → | 1 | 0 | 48 | - | → | 0 | 0 | 48 | 1 | ↓ |
| 8 | 4 / 46 | 3 | 0 | 42 | 1 | → | 3 | 0 | 42 | 1 | → | 2 | 0 | 42 | 2 | ↓ |
| 9 | 0 / 14 | - | 0 | 14 | - | → | - | 0 | 14 | - | → | - | 0 | 14 | - | → |
| 10 | 2 / 57 | 2 | 0 | 55 | 0 | → | 2 | 0 | 55 | 0 | → | 1 | 1 | 54 | 1 | → * |
* unchanged, but due to false positive lymph node; ↑, overstated; → , unchanged; ↓, understated; FAPI, fibroblast activation protein inhibitor; FDG, fluorodesoxyglucose; FN, false negative; FP, false positive; Histo, histopathology; LN, lymph node(s); Mets, metastases; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Pat #, patient number; TN, true negative; Total, total number of resected lymph nodes; TP, true positive