Literature DB >> 34050017

Analysis of off-target effects in CRISPR-based gene drives in the human malaria mosquito.

William T Garrood1, Nace Kranjc1, Karl Petri2,3, Daniel Y Kim2,3, Jimmy A Guo2,3, Andrew M Hammond1,4, Ioanna Morianou1, Vikram Pattanayak2,3, J Keith Joung2,3, Andrea Crisanti5,6, Alekos Simoni5,7.   

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease-based gene drives have been developed toward the aim of control of the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae Gene drives are based on an active source of Cas9 nuclease in the germline that promotes super-Mendelian inheritance of the transgene by homology-directed repair ("homing"). Understanding whether CRISPR-induced off-target mutations are generated in Anopheles mosquitoes is an important aspect of risk assessment before any potential field release of this technology. We compared the frequencies and the propensity of off-target events to occur in four different gene-drive strains, including a deliberately promiscuous set-up, using a nongermline restricted promoter for SpCas9 and a guide RNA with many closely related sites (two or more mismatches) across the mosquito genome. Under this scenario we observed off-target mutations at frequencies no greater than 1.42%. We witnessed no evidence that CRISPR-induced off-target mutations were able to accumulate (or drive) in a mosquito population, despite multiple generations' exposure to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease construct. Furthermore, judicious design of the guide RNA used for homing of the CRISPR construct, combined with tight temporal constriction of Cas9 expression to the germline, rendered off-target mutations undetectable. The findings of this study represent an important milestone for the understanding and managing of CRISPR-Cas9 specificity in mosquitoes, and demonstrates that CRISPR off-target editing in the context of a mosquito gene drive can be reduced to minimal levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles; CRISPR-Cas; gene drive; off-target; vector control

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050017     DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004838117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gene Editing and Genetic Control of Hemipteran Pests: Progress, Challenges and Perspectives.

Authors:  Inaiara D Pacheco; Linda L Walling; Peter W Atkinson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome modification of the glassy-winged sharpshooter Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar).

Authors:  Inaiara de Souza Pacheco; Anna-Louise A Doss; Beatriz G Vindiola; Dylan J Brown; Cassandra L Ettinger; Jason E Stajich; Richard A Redak; Linda L Walling; Peter W Atkinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  A nickase Cas9 gene-drive system promotes super-Mendelian inheritance in Drosophila.

Authors:  Víctor López Del Amo; Sara Sanz Juste; Valentino M Gantz
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 9.995

4.  Life 2.0-A CRISPR path to a sustainable planet.

Authors:  Dana Carroll; Barbara J Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A Markerless CRISPR-Mediated System for Genome Editing in Candida auris Reveals a Conserved Role for Cas5 in the Caspofungin Response.

Authors:  Craig L Ennis; Aaron D Hernday; Clarissa J Nobile
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-03

6.  Specificity and off-target effects of AAV8-TBG viral vectors for the manipulation of hepatocellular gene expression in mice.

Authors:  Christos Kiourtis; Ania Wilczynska; Colin Nixon; William Clark; Stephanie May; Thomas G Bird
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 7.  Biosafety materials: Ushering in a new era of infectious disease diagnosis and treatment with the CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Yuquan Zhang; Ziyue Li; Julien Milon Essola; Kun Ge; Xuyan Dai; Huining He; Haihua Xiao; Yuhua Weng; Yuanyu Huang
Journal:  Biosaf Health       Date:  2022-03-14

8.  Modifying mosquitoes to suppress disease transmission: Is the long wait over?

Authors:  Jeffrey R Powell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Fitness effects of CRISPR endonucleases in Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Anna M Langmüller; Jackson Champer; Sandra Lapinska; Lin Xie; Matthew Metzloff; Samuel E Champer; Jingxian Liu; Yineng Xu; Jie Du; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 8.713

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.