| Literature DB >> 34049889 |
Jinhua Sun1, Matthew Sadd2, Philip Edenborg3, Henrik Grönbeck3, Peter H Thiesen4, Zhenyuan Xia1, Vanesa Quintano5, Ren Qiu6, Aleksandar Matic2, Vincenzo Palermo7,5.
Abstract
Sodium, in contrast to otherEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34049889 PMCID: PMC8163079 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf0812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Preparation of Janus graphene.
(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the Janus graphene and the stacked Janus graphene thin film. (B) Cartoon showing Na+ ions intercalated in between graphene sheets with aminobenzene (AB) spacers. (C) Raman spectra of AB graphene featuring different functionalization density, achieved by increasing the reaction time with 4-nitrobenzene diazonium tetrafluoroborate (4-NBD). (D) N 1s XPS spectra of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene, NB graphene, and AB graphene. The presence of the -NH2 peak of NB graphene is due to the conversion of -NO2 to -NH2 triggered by x-ray irradiation during the measurement (see also XPS section). (E) Simultaneous decrease in C/N ratio (measured by XPS) and increase in ID/IG ratio (measured by Raman) with increasing reaction time,
Fig. 2Characterizations of stacked AB graphene multilayers.
(A) Optical microscope image of AB graphene multilayers observed at the sample edge. Inset: Macroscopic image of the whole sample on Si/SiO2. (B) Optical microscope image and corresponding Raman mapping of the intensity of 2D band of AB graphene film. (C and D) Cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of (C) stacked AB graphene thin film and (D) stacked CVD graphene thin film. The averaged intensity profile is reported on the right side of each image.
Fig. 3DFT modeling of Na+ intercalation in AB graphene.
(A to D) Configurations optimized by DFT calculations for Na+ intercalation between two graphene sheets separated by AB. The relative energy is indicated with respect to the most stable position in (A). All calculated configurations are reported in Materials and Methods and the Supplementary Materials. Atomic color code: H (white), C (gray), N (blue), and Na (purple). (E) Isosurface of differential charge density calculated in presence of Na+ for the most stable configuration in (A).
Fig. 4Comparison of Li+ and Na+ intercalation in different materials.
(A) Shift of G band position during Li+ intercalation taking place in all materials tested: HOPG, graphene, and AB graphene. (B) Same experiment performed with Na+, showing no intercalation for HOPG and graphene, but intercalation in AB graphene. Some experimental points in the range around 0 V are not reported because the G band decreased so much that it was not possible to measure precisely its shift.
Fig. 5Monitoring of Na+ reversible intercalation by operando Raman.
(A) Series of Raman spectra acquired operando during a complete intercalation/deintercalation cycle of Na+ in AB graphene; the red spectrum was measured at ca. 0.6 V versus Na+/Na, green spectrum at 0.05 V versus Na+/Na, and blue spectrum at ca. 1.5 V versus Na+/Na. On the right, the corresponding current measured during the cycle. (B) A cartoon schematizing the different processes. (C) CV curves measured during the first two cycles of Na+ intercalation in AB graphene. The sweep rate was 0.042 mV/s. The first curve shows a sharp cathodic peak, which disappears in the second cycle, corresponding to the formation of a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). (D) Reversible change of different parameters during potential cycling: from top to bottom, we show the measured current, ID/IG ratio, intensity of 2D band (I2D), and position of G band.
Fig. 6Tracking the Na+ reversible intercalation into Janus graphene electrode by IES.
(A) Maps displaying the changes in the ellipsometric angle Δ obtained by IES during Na+ intercalation/deintercalation in AB graphene. (B) Corresponding current-time profile of the intercalation/deintercalation process. (C) The periodic change of voltage, Δ, and Ψ during intercalation/deintercalation processes. (D) Schematic illustration of the IES setup.
Fig. 7Simulation of the ellipsometric angle Delta.
(A) Experimental values of ellipsometric Delta measured during three charge/discharge cycles (taken from Fig. 6C). (B) Simulated values of ellipsometric Delta obtained cycling three times from 0 to 0.5 volume fraction of sodium ions, with a thickness of the void space between two graphenes of 0.30 nm.