Rupjyoti Talukdar1, Yoshihisa Tsuji2, Nitin Jagtap3, R Pradeep4, G V Rao4, D Nageshwar Reddy3. 1. Dept. of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India; Wellcome-DBT Indian Alliance Labs., Institute of Basic and Translational Research, Asian Healthcare Foundation, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: rup_talukdar@yahoo.com. 2. Dept. of General Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Japan. 3. Dept. of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India. 4. Dept. of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Earlier national surveys on the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) had reported non-compliance to practice guidelines. In the past decade, several guidelines were revised based on new evidence. In this multicenter international survey, we aimed to evaluate the practice patterns of early management of AP and compliance to the revised treatment guidelines across different disciplines and practice environments. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent via email to a target population of 654 that constituted of medical and surgical gastroenterologists, physicians and general surgeons, paediatricians from academic and non-academic centres across 30 countries. Other than demographic variables, the questionnaire contained items pertaining to early management of AP, such as, assessment at admissions and within first 72 h s, details regarding analgesics, IV hydration, oral/enteral feeding and antibiotic use. RESULTS: The response rate was 46.2% and after exclusions, a total of 297 participant's responses were analysed. Majority of the participants were from Asia, followed by Europe and the Americas. 181 (60.9%) claimed to follow practice guidelines, out of which 59 (32.6%) followed more than one. On further probing, only 41.9% were actually compliant to feeding and 59.7% to antibiotic guidelines. Even though participants opted for aggressive hydration, early feeding and avoidance of prophylactic antibiotics, there were non-compliance and discrepancies in titration of fluid therapy, indications of feeding and antibiotic use. DISCUSSION: Discrepancies and non-compliance still appear to exist in the early management of AP due to lack of strong evidence. We discuss ways that could improve compliance to the existing guidelines until stronger evidence comes to the fore.
INTRODUCTION: Earlier national surveys on the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) had reported non-compliance to practice guidelines. In the past decade, several guidelines were revised based on new evidence. In this multicenter international survey, we aimed to evaluate the practice patterns of early management of AP and compliance to the revised treatment guidelines across different disciplines and practice environments. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent via email to a target population of 654 that constituted of medical and surgical gastroenterologists, physicians and general surgeons, paediatricians from academic and non-academic centres across 30 countries. Other than demographic variables, the questionnaire contained items pertaining to early management of AP, such as, assessment at admissions and within first 72 h s, details regarding analgesics, IV hydration, oral/enteral feeding and antibiotic use. RESULTS: The response rate was 46.2% and after exclusions, a total of 297 participant's responses were analysed. Majority of the participants were from Asia, followed by Europe and the Americas. 181 (60.9%) claimed to follow practice guidelines, out of which 59 (32.6%) followed more than one. On further probing, only 41.9% were actually compliant to feeding and 59.7% to antibiotic guidelines. Even though participants opted for aggressive hydration, early feeding and avoidance of prophylactic antibiotics, there were non-compliance and discrepancies in titration of fluid therapy, indications of feeding and antibiotic use. DISCUSSION: Discrepancies and non-compliance still appear to exist in the early management of AP due to lack of strong evidence. We discuss ways that could improve compliance to the existing guidelines until stronger evidence comes to the fore.