| Literature DB >> 34048537 |
Margaret L Byron1, David W Murphy2, Kakani Katija3, Alexander P Hoover4, Joost Daniels3, Kuvvat Garayev2, Daisuke Takagi5, Eva Kanso6, Bradford J Gemmell7, Melissa Ruszczyk8, Arvind Santhanakrishnan9.
Abstract
Metachronal motion is used across a wide range of organisms for a diverse set of functions. However, despite its ubiquity, analysis of this behavior has been difficult to generalize across systems. Here we provide an overview of known commonalities and differences between systems that use metachrony to generate fluid flow. We also discuss strategies for standardizing terminology and defining future investigative directions that are analogous to other established subfields of biomechanics. Finally, we outline key challenges that are common to many metachronal systems, opportunities that have arisen due to the advent of new technology (both experimental and computational), and next steps for community development and collaboration across the nascent network of metachronal researchers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34048537 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Comp Biol ISSN: 1540-7063 Impact factor: 3.326