Literature DB >> 34047894

The cherry effect or the issue behind well-being.

Marko Ćurković1,2, Lucija Svetina3, Andro Košec4,5.   

Abstract

Humans define well-being on predefined assumptions, based on inner and outer criteria as references. As illustrated, these criteria are subject to constant change, even in a situation when one is acting freely and is in control of all possible external influences. Even in scenarios that seemingly allow autonomy with one variable to analyse, underlying "irrationality" affects our ability to define and operationalize any desirable trait or state, such as well-being, euthymia or health. Before eating a bowl full of cherries, one creates an idea of how much cherries he/she will eat. However, as one starts eating, perception and following assumptions change. As cherries labeled as most desirable disappear, other cherries start to appear more alluring. The cherry effect could be of relevance in defining the terms such as well-being, euthymia and basically any other term encompassing a complex category of the human condition dependent on our perceived reality.
© 2021. Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Euthymia; Well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047894     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-021-01032-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  9 in total

1.  Attentional Selection Mediates Framing and Risk-Bias Effects.

Authors:  Moshe Glickman; Konstantinos Tsetsos; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07

Review 2.  Rationality.

Authors:  Eldar Shafir; Robyn A LeBoeuf
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 3.  Regression towards the mean, historically considered.

Authors:  S M Stigler
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Optimal policy for multi-alternative decisions.

Authors:  Satohiro Tajima; Jan Drugowitsch; Nisheet Patel; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Selective overweighting of larger magnitudes during noisy numerical comparison.

Authors:  Bernhard Spitzer; Leonhard Waschke; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-07-17

6.  Confirmation bias in the utilization of others' opinion strength.

Authors:  Andreas Kappes; Ann H Harvey; Terry Lohrenz; P Read Montague; Tali Sharot
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making.

Authors:  Martin Hilbert
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing.

Authors:  Andrew Steptoe; Angus Deaton; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Toward an Integrative Psychometric Model of Emotions.

Authors:  Jens Lange; Jonas Dalege; Denny Borsboom; Gerben A van Kleef; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.