Literature DB >> 34047889

Prognostic impact of bone metastatic volume beyond vertebrae and pelvis in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Kotaro Suzuki1, Yasuyoshi Okamura2, Takuto Hara2, Tomoaki Terakawa2, Junya Furukawa2, Kenichi Harada2, Nobuyuki Hinata2, Masato Fujisawa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bone metastasis beyond the vertebrae and pelvis has been a key factor in prognostic models of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the clinical significance of it is still unclear. The present study evaluated the prognostic impact of the volume of bone metastasis beyond the vertebrae and pelvis on the outcomes of mHSPC and created an ideal risk classification based on it.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 197 patients with mHSPC who were treated with combined androgen blockade as the initial treatment between June 2003 and October 2019. We calculated the bone scan index (BSI), including the BSI beyond the vertebrae and pelvis (bBSI), using BONENAVI, and investigated the association between the BSI and the overall survival (OS) of mHSPC.
RESULTS: According to the CHAARTED criteria, 91 and 106 patients were classified into the low- and high-volume groups, respectively. Of the 79 patients who did not have visceral metastasis in the high-volume group, those with a bBSI ≤ 0.27 (n = 16) showed a favorable OS, as did those in the low-volume group. The modified CHAARTED high-volume group (presence of visceral metastases or 4 bone lesions with a bBSI > 0.27) showed a significantly shorter OS than others, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.69 (p < 0.001), which was higher than that observed with the original CHAARTED criteria (HR = 4.33).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that considering the volume of bone metastasis beyond the vertebrae and pelvis may help to improve the accuracy of risk classification. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metastasis; Bone scan index; Metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer; Risk classification

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047889     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01931-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  1 in total

Review 1.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Erik Briers; Thomas Van den Broeck; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Stefano Fanti; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Silke Gillessen; Nikos Grivas; Jeremy Grummet; Ann M Henry; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Thomas B Lam; Michael Lardas; Matthew Liew; Malcolm D Mason; Lisa Moris; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Henk G van der Poel; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Derya Tilki; Thomas Wiegel; Peter-Paul M Willemse; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

  1 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence for nuclear medicine in oncology.

Authors:  Kenji Hirata; Hiroyuki Sugimori; Noriyuki Fujima; Takuya Toyonaga; Kohsuke Kudo
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Development of a Prognostic Model of Overall Survival for Metastatic Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer in Japanese Men.

Authors:  Ryunosuke Nakagawa; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Tomoyuki Makino; Renato Naito; Suguru Kadomoto; Norihito Akatani; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Shohei Kawaguchi; Takahiro Nohara; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Yoshifumi Kadono; Atsushi Takamatsu; Kotaro Yoshida; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.