| Literature DB >> 34047842 |
Erika Hiltbrunner1, Jonas Arnaiz2, Christian Körner2.
Abstract
The majority of alpine plants are of small stature. Through their small size alpine plants are decoupled from the free atmospheric circulation and accumulate solar heat. However, a few alpine species do not follow that "rule" and protrude with their aboveground structures from the microclimatic shelter of the main canopy boundary layer. We aim at explaining the phenomenon of being tall by exploring the biomass production and carbon relations of four pairs of small and tall phylogenetically related taxa in alpine grassland. We compared species and stature-specific biomass allocation, shifts in non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentrations in different tissues throughout the season, and we used 13C labels to track carbon transfer from leaves to belowground structures. Small and tall herbs did not differ in their above- to belowground biomass allocation. The NSC composition (starch, fructan, simple sugars) and allocation did not show a stature-specific pattern, except for higher concentrations of simple sugars in tall species during their extended shoot growth. In relative terms, tall species had higher NSC pools in rhizomes, whereas small species had higher NSC pools in roots. Our findings do not place tall alpine forbs in an exceptional category in terms of biomass allocation and carbohydrate storage. The tall versus small stature of the examined herbs does not seem to be associated with specific adjustments in carbon relations. 13C pulse labelling revealed early C autonomy in young, unfolding leaves of the tall species, which are thus independent of the carbon reserves in the massive belowground organs.Entities:
Keywords: 13C labelling; Functional growth analysis; High-elevation; Microclimate; Stature
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34047842 PMCID: PMC8591020 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04950-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oecologia ISSN: 0029-8549 Impact factor: 3.225
Selected pairs of small versus tall plant species of the same genus or family. For G. punctata/G. purpurea and L. mutellina/L. mutellinoides a clear distinction of the species is only possible when they are flowering
| Small herbs | Tall herbs | Family |
|---|---|---|
| Gentianaceae | ||
| Apiaceae | ||
| Polygonaceae | ||
| Asteraceae |
For the early phenological developmental stages 1–2, both species could have been sampled, but for the later stages it was exclusively G. punctata and L. mutellina
Fig. 2Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentrations (mean ± S.E.). NSC consisted of simple sugars, fructan and starch (mg g−1 d. m.) of the four small versus tall pairs in different compartments at four phenological stages (n = 4–6). No stems in the Gnaphalium pair were available during the first two stages
Plant height (including flower or bud), height ratio tall to small, specific leaf area (SLA, m2 kg−1) and leaf area ratio (LAR, m2 kg−1, product of LMF and SLA) at peak biomass (phenological stage 3, mean ± S.E., n = number of replicates)
| Species | Height (cm) | Height ratio | SLA (m2 kg−1) | LAR (m2 kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small/tall | Small | Tall | Tall: small | Small | Tall | Small | Tall | |
| 7.3 ± 0.6a | 25.2 ± 2.6b | 3.5 | 11.1 ± 0.4a | 18.3 ± 5.7a | 5.3 ± 0.3a | 2.1 ± 0.3b | 5–6 | |
| 13.5 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2 | ||||||
| 17.6 ± 1.8a | 57.8 ± 3.3b | 3.3 | 11.1 ± 1.0a | 17.2 ± 0.4b | 1.3 ± 0.2a | 2.3 ± 0.4b | 6 | |
| 20.8 ± 3.3 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2 | ||||||
| 38.6 ± 0.9a | 78.3 ± 5.2b | 2.0 | 28.5 ± 1.1a | 18.7 ± 1.5b | 2.1 ± 0.2a | 1.9 ± 0.2a | 6 | |
| 19.4 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 2 | ||||||
| 1.1 ± 0.1a | 15.0 ± 0.9b | 13.4 | 23.9 ± 2.5a | 26.2 ± 7.9a | 7.3 ± 0.7a | 7.2 ± 2.0a | 6 | |
Three out of four tall species form monospecific stands (additional SLA, LAR values). Different letters indicate significant differences within pairs at p < 0.05 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test)
Mean (± S.E.) dry matter (g) and mass fractions (%) of small vs. tall species and monospecific stands of three tall herbs at peak biomass (stage 3)
| Species | Compartment | Dry matter (g) | Dry matter (g m−2) | Mass fraction (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small/tall | Small | Tall | Tall stand | Small | Tall | Tall stand | ||
| Leaf | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 1.42 ± 0.35 | 179.9 ± 11.5 | 47.6 ± 2.4a | 13.0 ± 1.3b | 15.2 ± 4.2b | 0.008 | |
| Stem | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 1.36 ± 0.09 | 96.0 ± 15.2 | 24.8 ± 2.5a | 14.5 ± 1.5b | 7.7 ± 0.5b | 0.011 | |
| Rhizome | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 7.22 ± 1.14 | 964.1 ± 260.1 | 10.8 ± 2.6a | 70.8 ± 0.8b | 75.7 ± 4.3b | 0.006 | |
| Root | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.05 | 18.7 ± 8.0 | 16.7 ± 1.2a | 1.7 ± 0.3b | 1.4 ± 0.3b | 0.008 | |
| Aboveground | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 2.78 ± 0.42 | 276.0 ± 3.8 | 72.4 ± 3.1a | 27.5 ± 0.8b | 22.9 ± 4.7b | 0.007 | |
| Belowground | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 7.40 ± 1.19 | 982.8 ± 268.1 | 27.6 ± 3.1a | 72.5 ± 0.8b | 77.1 ± 4.7b | 0.007 | |
| Leaf | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 3.71 ± 1.09 | 117.4 ± 7.7 | 12.2 ± 2.2 | 13.5 ± 2.1 | 11.4 ± 0.8 | 0.842 | |
| Stem | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 4.94 ± 0.96 | 173.2 ± 33.5 | 15.8 ± 2.3 | 21.5 ± 2.6 | 16.6 ± 1.0 | 0.279 | |
| Rhizome | 0.97 ± 0.22 | 15.67 ± 5.23 | 715.4 ± 94.3 | 70.9 ± 3.2 | 59.2 ± 5.6 | 69.1 ± 0.2 | 0.152 | |
| Root | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 1.60 ± 0.65 | 29.8 ± 3.9 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 2.9 ± 0.0 | 0.433 | |
| Aboveground | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 8.65 ± 2.00 | 290.6 ± 41.2 | 28.0 ± 3.1 | 35.0 ± 3.7 | 28.0 ± 0.2 | 0.237 | |
| Belowground | 0.99 ± 0.22 | 17.28 ± 5.59 | 745.3 ± 98.2 | 72.0 ± 3.1 | 65.0 ± 3.7 | 72.0 ± 0.2 | 0.237 | |
| Leaf | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 8.705 ± 1.70 | 168.9 ± 1.9 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 10.3 ± 1.5 | 5.7 ± 0.8 | 0.074 | |
| Stem | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 13.69 ± 1.78 | 519.3 ± 135.7 | 13.3 ± 1.1 | 16.8 ± 1.9 | 16.9 ± 1.9 | 0.296 | |
| Rhizome | 1.65 ± 0.46 | 28.90 ± 7.86 | 1220.3 ± 181.9 | 39.8 ± 2.7 | 32.6 ± 3.6 | 40.5 ± 0.3 | 0.130 | |
| Root | 1.55 ± 0.43 | 34.39 ± 6.67 | 1109.6 ± 149.5 | 39.5 ± 3.2 | 40.4 ± 2.2 | 36.9 ± 0.8 | 0.416 | |
| Aboveground | 0.78 ± 0.14 | 22.40 ± 3.39 | 688.2 ± 137.6 | 20.8 ± 1.5 | 27.0 ± 3.2 | 22.6 ± 1.0 | 0.344 | |
| Belowground | 3.21 ± 0.84 | 63.29 ± 14.12 | 2329.9 ± 331.4 | 79.2 ± 1.5 | 73.0 ± 3.2 | 77.4 ± 1.0 | 0.344 | |
| Leaf | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 30.8 ± 2.2 | 28.0 ± 1.8 | 0.394 | |||
| Stem | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 23.0 ± 1.5 | 36.7 ± 1.4 | 0.002 | |||
| Rhizome | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 26.9 ± 2.4 | 10.7 ± 1.0 | 0.002 | |||
| Root | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 19.3 ± 1.9 | 24.6 ± 1.3 | 0.065 | |||
| Aboveground | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 53.7 ± 2.1 | 64.7 ± 1.2 | 0.004 | |||
| Belowground | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 46.3 ± 2.1 | 35.3 ± 1.2 | 0.004 | |||
Differences between mass fractions within each pair are indicated by p values and different letters (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Comparison of mass fractions (% of dry biomass) ± S.E. of the four small versus tall pairs; “stand” means monospecific stands of each of the three tall species (mean ± S.E., 50 × 50 cm)
The effect of plant stature (size), plant compartment and phenological stages on total non-structural carbohydrates (NSC), simple free sugars, fructan and starch concentrations
| Dependent variable | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total NSC | |||
| (Size/pair) | 1, 3 | 0.5 | 0.532 |
| Compartment | 3, 689 | 169.2 | < 0.001 |
| Stage | 3, 689 | 69.6 | < 0.001 |
| Compartment x stage | 9, 689 | 4.3 | < 0.001 |
| Simple sugars | |||
| (Size/pair) | 1, 3 | 0.3 | 0.630 |
| Compartment | 3, 691 | 39.0 | < 0.001 |
| Stage | 3, 691 | 50.0 | < 0.001 |
| Size x stage | 3, 691 | 2.9 | < 0.001 |
| Compartment x stage | 9, 691 | 2.0 | < 0.001 |
| Fructan | |||
| (Size/pair) | 1, 3 | 1.0 | 0.387 |
| Compartment | 3, 687 | 200.9 | < 0.001 |
| Stage | 3, 687 | 16.2 | < 0.001 |
| Size x compartment | 3, 687 | 9.8 | < 0.001 |
| Compartment x stage | 9, 687 | 9.5 | < 0.001 |
| Starch | |||
| (Size/pair) | 1, 3 | 0.4 | 0.558 |
| Compartment | 3, 683 | 65.8 | < 0.001 |
| Stage | 3, 683 | 4.0 | 0.008 |
| Size x stage | 3, 683 | 8.2 | < 0.001 |
| Compartment x stage | 9, 683 | 5.6 | < 0.001 |
Small and tall species were “nested” under pair. Only compartments present in all species were included in the statistical analysis (balanced design). Models were recalculated after removing non-significant interactions terms from the models
Mean NSC pools (± S.E., mg plant−1 and g m−2) in the different plant compartments of the four small vs. tall pairs and in monospecific stands of three tall species at peak biomass (stage 3)
| Species | Compartment | NSC pool (mg plant−1) | NSC pool (g m−2) | Ratio below-: aboveground NSC pool | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small/tall | Small | Tall | Tall stand | Small | Tall | Tall stand | |
| Leaf | 40 ± 7 | 313 ± 83 | 40 ± 7 | ||||
| Stem | 37 ± 5 | 466 ± 38 | 33 ± 6 | ||||
| Rhizome | 6 ± 1 | 2415 ± 426 | 323 ± 97 | ||||
| Root | 16 ± 2 | 63 ± 18 | 6 ± 3 | ||||
| Aboveground | 77 ± 6 | 779 ± 65 | 73 ± 9 | ||||
| Belowground | 22 ± 2 | 2478 ± 302 | 329 ± 97 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 4.5 | |
| Leaf | 24 ± 7 | 572 ± 177 | 18 ± 3 | ||||
| Stem | 27 ± 3 | 650 ± 139 | 23 ± 6 | ||||
| Rhizome | 470 ± 111 | 6372 ± 2203 | 291 ± 60 | ||||
| Root | 12 ± 5 | 635 ± 266 | 12 ± 3 | ||||
| Aboveground | 51 ± 6 | 1222 ± 159 | 41 ± 6 | ||||
| Belowground | 483 ± 79 | 7007 ± 1569 | 303 ± 60 | 9.5 | 5.7 | 7.4 | |
| Leaf | 26 ± 7 | 917 ± 194 | 18 ± 2 | ||||
| Stem | 56 ± 13 | 2003 ± 417 | 76 ± 29 | ||||
| Rhizome | 623 ± 184 | 12480 ± 3490 | 527 ± 99 | ||||
| Root | 802 ± 226 | 18848 ± 4164 | 608 ± 138 | ||||
| Aboveground | 82 ± 11 | 2920 ± 325 | 94 ± 29 | ||||
| Belowground | 1426 ± 206 | 31328 ± 3842 | 1135 ± 170 | 17.4 | 10.7 | 12.1 | |
| Leaf | 5 ± 1 | 24 ± 4 | |||||
| Stem | 8 ± 1 | 39 ± 5 | |||||
| Rhizome | 10 ± 2 | 9 ± 1 | |||||
| Root | 12 ± 1 | 58 ± 3 | |||||
| Aboveground | 13 ± 1 | 63 ± 5 | |||||
| Belowground | 22 ± 2 | 68 ± 2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | |||
Fig. 3Mean δ13C values (‰, ± S.E.) of 13CO2 pulsed three tall herbs in a leaves after 0, 1, 2 and 3 days and in b stems, rhizomes (separated in 2012 = rhiz-1 and 2011 = rhiz-2) and youngest roots after 3 days at phenological stage 1 and stage 2. Y axis differs in a and b. Gray line indicates δ13C value in non-enriched 13CO2 control plants (range of −28.4 to −24.1‰). Not all tissues were available (n. a.)