R Hohlfeld1. 1. Institut für klinische Neuroimmunologie, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany/Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
Basic research has uncovered surprising connections between the gut microbiota and essential
functions of the body. These exciting findings offer fascinating perspectives for the
treatment of human diseases. Clinical application, however, lags behind the progress made in
basic understanding of the microbiota. This sobering fact provides the background for the
current controversy.Laura Calvo-Barreiro and colleagues argue that therapeutic modulation of the microbiota can
not only regulate peripheral immune responses but also induce remyelination and neuroprotection.
This optimistic view is supported by proponents’ studies in animal models.[2,3] By contrast, Christopher McMurran points out
that remedying dysbiosis can improve inflammation but not demyelination in animal models.
His more sceptical view is based on his observation that modulation of the microbiota
had only minimal impact on remyelination in toxic-induced (lysolecithin or cuprizone) mouse models.Taken together, there is convincing evidence that modulation of the microbiota can ameliorate
(experimental) autoimmune responses. There is also firm evidence that the microbiota regulates
neurobiological and microglial functions via the ‘gut–brain axis’.
It is less clear, however, whether the microbiota has a direct influence on
myelination.What are the most urgent challenges for human microbiota research to push
the field towards clinical translation? First, the number of studied subjects needs to be
drastically increased. Many published studies indicate that in multiple sclerosis (MS) there
is indeed a ‘dysbiosis’ of the commensal microbiota.
However, most of these studies were based on relatively small cohorts lacking rigorous
controls. In this regard, the international MS Microbiome Study (iMSMS) takes a big step
forward by aiming to collect a very large number of samples from people with MS. Household
members serve as controls.
This large study should help to characterize the currently somewhat vaguely described
state of ‘dysbiosis’. Second, in order to identify disease-relevant microbes, it is essential
that candidate bacteria are tested for their functional disease-promoting
capacity. This can be achieved, for example, with gnotobiotic mouse models: colonization of
genetically engineered autoimmune-prone, germ-free mice with human-derived microbiota helps to
distinguish between disease-promoting and protective bacteria.[9,10] Identification of an MS-relevant microbial
signature should open new doors for rational therapy.
Authors: Laura Calvo-Barreiro; Herena Eixarch; Manuel Ponce-Alonso; Mireia Castillo; Rafael Lebrón-Galán; Leyre Mestre; Carmen Guaza; Diego Clemente; Rosa Del Campo; Xavier Montalban; Carmen Espejo Journal: Cells Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Christopher E McMurran; Alerie Guzman de la Fuente; Rosana Penalva; Ofra Ben Menachem-Zidon; Yvonne Dombrowski; John Falconer; Ginez A Gonzalez; Chao Zhao; Fynn N Krause; Adam M H Young; Julian L Griffin; Clare A Jones; Claire Hollins; Markus M Heimesaat; Denise C Fitzgerald; Robin J M Franklin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura Calvo-Barreiro; Herena Eixarch; Thais Cornejo; Carme Costa; Mireia Castillo; Leyre Mestre; Carmen Guaza; María Del Carmen Martínez-Cuesta; Takeshi Tanoue; Kenya Honda; Juan José González-López; Xavier Montalban; Carmen Espejo Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 7.620