| Literature DB >> 34046045 |
Xuewei Wang1, Jun Liu1.
Abstract
Plant disease detection technology is an important part of the intelligent agricultural Internet of Things monitoring system. The real natural environment requires the plant disease detection system to have extremely high real time detection and accuracy. The lightweight network MobileNetv2-YOLOv3 model can meet the real-time detection, but the accuracy is not enough to meet the actual needs. This study proposed a multiscale parallel algorithm MP-YOLOv3 based on the MobileNetv2-YOLOv3 model. The proposed method put forward a multiscale feature fusion method, and an efficient channel attention mechanism was introduced into the detection layer of the network to achieve feature enhancement. The parallel detection algorithm was used to effectively improve the detection performance of multiscale tomato gray mold lesions while ensuring the real-time performance of the algorithm. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can accurately and real-time detect multiscale tomato gray mold lesions in a real natural environment. The F1 score and the average precision reached 95.6 and 93.4% on the self-built tomato gray mold detection dataset. The model size was only 16.9 MB, and the detection time of each image was 0.022 s.Entities:
Keywords: convolutional neural network; deep learning; intelligent agriculture; multiscale; object detection; plant diseases; tomato gray mold
Year: 2021 PMID: 34046045 PMCID: PMC8148345 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.620273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Detailed information of samples in test images.
| Conditions | Independent leaves | Indistinct leaves | Shaded leaves | Occluded leaves |
| Number of images | 68 | 62 | 74 | 59 |
| Number of annotated lesions | 469 | 457 | 516 | 413 |
FIGURE 1Overall framework of a multiscale parallel algorithm for the early detection of tomato gray mold in a complex natural environment.
FIGURE 2Efficient channel attention module.
FIGURE 3Flowchart of the parallel detection algorithm.
Comparison of the characteristics of different algorithms.
| Algorithms | Network structure | Backbone network | Feature extraction capability |
| The proposed method | One-stage | MobileNetv2 | Multiscale feature extraction |
| Tiny-YOLOv3 | One-stage | 7-layer conv + Max | The ability of deep feature extraction is poor. |
| MobileNetv2-YOLOv3 | One-stage | MobileNetv2 | The ability of deep feature extraction is poor. |
| MobileNetv2-SSD | One-stage | MobileNetv2 | The ability of deep feature extraction is poor. |
| Faster R-CNN | Two-stage | ResNet | The accuracy outperforms some of the one-stage detectors, but the speed is low. |
FIGURE 4The effect diagram of the detection method in this paper. (A) Independent leaves; (B) indistinct leaves; (C) shaded leaves; (D) occluded leaves.
Detailed detection results of tomato gray mold.
| Conditions | Independent leaves | Indistinct leaves | Shaded leaves | Occluded leaves | Total |
| Number of objects correctly identified | 453 | 396 | 432 | 337 | 1,578 |
| Number of annotated lesions | 469 | 457 | 516 | 413 | 1,855 |
| Recall rate | 96.59% | 86.65% | 83.72% | 81.60% | 85.07% |
Detection effects of ablation experiments.
| Strategies | Multiscale feature fusion module | Efficient channel attention module | F1 score/% | Average precision/% |
| 1 | × | × | 87.9 | 85.3 |
| 2 | √ | × | 91.7 | 89.6 |
| 3 | × | √ | 93.2 | 91.1 |
| 4 | √ | √ | 95.6 | 93.4 |
Comparison of detection results using different algorithms.
| Algorithms | F1 score/% | Average precision/% | Single image detection time/second (s) |
| The proposed method | 95.6 | 93.4 | 0.022 |
| Tiny-YOLOv3 | 86.8 | 84.1 | 0.023 |
| MobileNetv2-YOLOv3 | 87.9 | 85.3 | 0.022 |
| MobileNetv2-SSD | 88.5 | 86.6 | 0.035 |
| Faster R-CNN | 89.9 | 87.8 | 0.126 |