| Literature DB >> 34045956 |
Javad Sharifi-Rad1,2, Abhijit Dey3, Niranjan Koirala4, Shabnum Shaheen5, Nasreddine El Omari6, Bahare Salehi7, Tamar Goloshvili8, Nathália Cristina Cirone Silva9, Abdelhakim Bouyahya10, Sara Vitalini11, Elena M Varoni12, Miquel Martorell13,14, Anna Abdolshahi15, Anca Oana Docea16, Marcello Iriti11, Daniela Calina17, Francisco Les18,19, Víctor López18,19, Constantin Caruntu20,21.
Abstract
The genus Cinnamomum includes a number of plant species largely used as food, food additives and spices for a long time. Different traditional healing systems have used these plants as herbal remedies to cure diverse ailments. The aim of this comprehensive and updated review is to summarize the biodiversity of the genus Cinnamomum, its bioactive compounds, the mechanisms that underlie the pharmacological activities and molecular targets and toxicological safety. All the data in this review have been collected from databases and recent scientific literature including Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect etc. The results showed that the bioactive compounds of Cinnamomum species possess antimicrobial, antidiabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and neuroprotective effects. The preclinical (in vitro/in vivo) studies provided the possible molecular mechanisms of these action. As a novelty, recent clinical studies and toxicological data described in this paper support and confirm the pharmacological importance of the genus Cinnamomum. In conclusion, the obtained results from preclinical studies and clinical trials, as well as reduced side effects provide insights into future research of new drugs based on extracts and bioactive compounds from Cinnamomum plants.Entities:
Keywords: Ciannamomum spp.; Pharmacology; Toxicological data; clinical trials; mechanisms of action; phytochemistry
Year: 2021 PMID: 34045956 PMCID: PMC8144503 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.600139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Chemical structures of the phyto-constituents of Cinnamomum species.
The most representative chemical compounds of Cinnamomum plants.
| Plant parts | Compounds | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Bark | cinnamaldehyde 65–80% eugenol 5–10% |
|
| Bark of root | camphor 58% |
|
| Leaf | eugenol 70–90%, cinnamaldehyde 1–8% |
|
| Fruits |
|
|
| Buds | α-bergamotene 27% terpene hydrocarbons 80% α-copaene 20%, terpenoids 10% |
|
| Flowers |
|
|
FIGURE 2Antibacterial properties of Cinnamomum plants’ derivatives. The main potential mechanisms of antibacterial action are related to: 1) the partial degradation of the bacterial cell wall, 2) the increase of membrane permeability, 3) the leakage of cytoplasm materials, 4) the shrinkage of bacterial cells and prominent distortion, and 5) the alteration of secondary, tertiary structures and bacterial protein.
Preclinical pharmacological activities of Cinnamomum genus.
| Pharmacological activity | Cinnamum plant/extracts/fractions | Methods | Models cellular lines ( | Effects/underlying mechanisms | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Disk diffusion | MRSA | IC50 = 12.0 mm |
|
| ↓bacterial growth | |||||
| Microdilution | MRSA | IC50 = 156.25 μg/ml | |||
| ↓ bacterial growth | |||||
|
| Disk diffusion |
| 19.5 mm |
| |
|
| 17.5 mm | ||||
|
| 16.5 mm | ||||
|
| 34 mm | ||||
|
| 16.5 mm | ||||
|
| 18 mm | ||||
|
| 16.5 mm | ||||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml |
| |
|
| IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 500 mg/L |
| |
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 500 mg/L |
| |
|
| IC50 = 500 mg/L not determined | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Disk diffusion |
| 13 mm |
| |
| Microdilution | IC50 = 250–500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Disk diffusion |
| 22.4 mm |
| |
| Microdilution | IC50 = 0.03 μg/ml | ||||
| Agar disc diffusion |
| 21.1 mm | ( | ||
|
| 14.5 mm | ||||
|
| 27.5 mm | ||||
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 2.5–5 mg/ml | |||
| Microdilution assay |
| IC50 = 10 mg/ml | |||
|
| IC50 = 20 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 10 mg/ml | ||||
| Permeability of cell membrane |
| ↑ permeability of wall cell | |||
|
| |||||
|
| Disk diffusion |
| 7 mm |
| |
|
| 8 mm | ||||
|
| 9 mm | ||||
|
| 12 mm | ||||
|
| 7 mm | ||||
|
| 7 mm | ||||
|
| 11 mm | ||||
|
| Disk diffusion | MRSA | 14.5 mm |
| |
| Microdilution | IC50 = 156.3 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Disk diffusion | MRSA | 10.5 mm |
| |
| Microdilution | IC50 = 625.0 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 3.1 μL/ml |
| |
|
| IC50 = 6.3 μL/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 6.3 μL/ml | ||||
|
| Diffusion method |
| 2 mm |
| |
|
| 3 mm | ||||
|
| 3 mm | ||||
|
| 2 mm | ||||
|
| 1 mm | ||||
|
| 1 mm | ||||
|
| 1 mm | ||||
|
| 1 mm | ||||
|
| 2 mm | ||||
|
| Diffusion method |
| 5 mm | ||
|
| 5 mm | ||||
|
| 6 mm | ||||
|
| 5 mm | ||||
|
| 3 mm | ||||
|
| 4 mm | ||||
|
| 7 mm | ||||
|
| 7 mm | ||||
|
| 1 mm | ||||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 250 μg/ml |
| |
|
| IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
| MRSA | IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 1,000 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Disk diffusion | MRSA | 7.5 mm |
| |
| Microdilution | IC50 = 500 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Agar well diffusion |
| Without inhibition |
| |
|
| 11 mm | ||||
|
| 14 mm | ||||
|
| 14 mm | ||||
|
| 20 mm | ||||
|
| 13.5 mm | ||||
|
| IC50 = 256 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 4,096 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 4,096 μg/ml | ||||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 0.55 mg/ml |
| |
|
| IC50 = 0.55 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 < 0.04 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 1.15 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 1.12 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 < 0.04 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 1.12 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.28 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.07 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.28 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
|
| Disk diffusion |
| 11 mm |
| |
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 120 mg/ml | |||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 0.1125 mg/ml |
| |
|
| Disk diffusion |
| 5 mm |
| |
|
| 4 mm | ||||
|
| 5.4 mm | ||||
|
| 6 mm | ||||
|
| 5.2 mm | ||||
|
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 625 μg/ml |
| |
|
| IC50 = 0.2 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.4 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.1 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 0.2 mg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 12.5 mg/ml | ||||
| Disk diffusion |
| 17.2 mm |
| ||
|
| 18.3 mm | ||||
|
| 15.7 mm | ||||
|
| 15.2 mm | ||||
|
| 17.5 mm | ||||
|
| 14.4 mm | ||||
|
| IC50 = 62.5 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 1.2 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 62.5 μg/ml | ||||
|
| IC50 = 125.0 μg/ml | ||||
|
| MIC = 62.5 μg/ml | ||||
|
| MIC = 125.0 μg/ml | ||||
| Membrane permeability reduction test |
| ↓wall cell permeability |
| ||
| Microdilution |
| IC50 = 1 mg/ml |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
|
| α-amylase, | IC50 = 0.5, 1.25, 2.5 mg/ml |
| ||
| ↓α-amylase, ↓α-glucosidase | |||||
|
| Yeast | IC50 = 5.83 μg/ml |
| ||
| ↓yeast | |||||
| IC50 = 670 μg/ml | |||||
| ↓mammalian | |||||
|
| Glucosidase, sucrase, maltase inhibition | ↓α-glucosidase inhibitory activity ↑ sucrase and maltase inhibition |
| ||
|
| PTP1B, | ↓ |
| ||
|
| |||||
|
| Rats/very high fat diet induced hyperglycemia 500, 300 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓FBG, dose dependent manner |
| ||
|
| Rats/glucose 2 g/kg b.w. i | ↓blood glucose control: Glibenclamide |
| ||
|
| Mice/STZ induced diabetes; 100 mg/kg/day; oral | ↓blood glucose |
| ||
| ↑insulin | |||||
|
| Mice/STZ induced diabetes; 200 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓ blood glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/alloxan induced diabetes 60 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓blood glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes 100,200,300 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓blood glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/alloxan induced diabetes; 500 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓ blood glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes 10, 200 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓ blood glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes 200 mg/kg, oral | ↑weight loss ↓FBG, ↓PPG |
| ||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes 20 mg/kg; oral | ↓plasma glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes 20 mg/kg; oral | ↓blood glucose |
| ||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes 20 mg/kg; oral | ↑muscle glycogen |
| ||
| ↑hepatic glycogen | |||||
| ↓FBG | |||||
|
| Rats/alloxan induced diabetes 5, 10, 20 mg/kg; oral | ↓FBG, dose-dependent manner |
| ||
| ↓cholesterol | |||||
| ↓urinary protein | |||||
| ↓TBARS | |||||
| ↓blood urea | |||||
| ↓catalase | |||||
|
| Rats/alloxan induced diabetes | ↓FBG, dose-dependent manner |
| ||
| 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg; oral | |||||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes | ↓blood glucose, dose-dependent manner |
| ||
| 3, 30 and 100 mg/kg; oral | |||||
|
| Rats/oral glucose tolerance test | ↓glycemic levels |
| ||
| 0.2 ml day/rat; oral | |||||
|
| Rats/STZ induced diabetes | ↓ postprandial hyperglycemia |
| ||
| 300 mg/kg; oral | |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| RAW 264.7, LPS stimulated mice macrophages | IC50= 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 μM anti-inflammatory |
| ||
|
| RAW 264.7, LPS stimulated mice macrophages | IC50= 100 μg/ml anti-inflammatory |
| ||
|
| |||||
|
| Rats | dose = 2–6 mg/kg bw |
| ||
| ↓NF-kB | |||||
|
| Mice/carrageenan induced paw edema | dose = 1.25, 2.5, 5 mg/kg/bw |
| ||
| Anti-inflammatory | |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| NPC/HK1, C666–1, human cancer cell lines | ↑cytotoxicity |
| ||
| IC50
| |||||
| IC50
| |||||
|
| SiHa, human cervical carcinoma cell lines | ↓growth of cancer cells |
| ||
| ↑cytotoxicity | |||||
| IC50
| |||||
|
| HT 29, HCT 116, human colorectal carcinoma cell lines | ↑Nrf2 |
| ||
| ↑antioxidant | |||||
|
| Lymphoma, melanoma, mice cancer cell lines | ↓tumor cell growth |
| ||
| ↑cytotoxicity | |||||
| IC50 = 0.5 mg/ml | |||||
|
| Hep G2, hepatoma cells line | ↑apoptosis |
| ||
| ↑p53, ↑APO-1 | |||||
| ↑cytotoxicity | |||||
| IC50 = 9.8 μM | |||||
|
| SW 480, human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines A431, SCC1 human epidermoid carcinoma cells A375, human melanoma cell lines | ↑DNA damage |
| ||
| ↑cytotoxicity | |||||
| IC50 = 9.12 μg/ml | |||||
| IC50 = 13.30 μg/ml | |||||
| IC50 = 17.59 μg/ml | |||||
|
| NTUB1, human urothelial carcinoma cell line SW480, human colon adenocarcinoma cell line | ↓tyrosinase |
| ||
| ↑apoptosis | |||||
|
| DU145, human prostate cancer cell line | ↓mitochondrial transmembrane potential |
| ||
| ↑cytochrome C | |||||
| ↑caspase-9/caspase-3 ↑cytotoxicity | |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| C6 glial cells, OGD exposed | ↓glial cell swelling |
| ||
| ↓glutamate uptake | |||||
|
| BV2 microglias, LPS activated | ↓neuroinflammation |
| ||
| IC50 = 50 μg/ml | |||||
|
| |||||
|
| Mice/6-OHDA treated intracerebroventricular | Anti-neuroinflammatory |
| ||
| Dose = 30 mg/kg | |||||
|
| Rats/SCOP treated intravenous | ↑cognition dose = 100, 200, 400 mg/kg |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
|
| Rats/ | Antihypertensive |
| ||
| dose = 5, 10, 20 mg/kg | |||||
|
|
| Mosquitocidal |
| ||
| Bark oil | |||||
|
| |||||
| LD50 = 0.33 μg/ml | |||||
|
| |||||
| LD50 = 0.66 μg/ml leaf oil | |||||
| LD50 = 1.03–2.1 μg/ml | |||||
|
|
| Ovicidal, adulticidal activities |
| ||
| LD50 = 0.5 mg/cm2 | |||||
|
| Rats | Anti-secretagogue |
| ||
| Antiulcer | |||||
| dose = 250, 500 mg/kg b.w | |||||
|
| Rats | Pro-healing effect |
| ||
| dose = 250, 500 mg/kg b.w | |||||
|
| Rats/CCl4-induced liver injury | ↑hepatoprotective |
| ||
| Dose = 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 g/kg | |||||
Abbreviations and symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; APOA-1, Apolipoprotein A-1; bw, body weight; FBG, fasting blood glucose; L-NAME, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester, LPS, lipopolysaccharide; p53, tumorprotein p53; PPG, postprandial plasma glucose; PTP1B, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; OGD, oxygen-glucose deprivation; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine; SCOP, scopolamine; STZ, streptozotocin; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.
FIGURE 3Potential mechanisms of antidiabetic effects of chemical compounds of Cinnamomum plants. Body cells mean all the human cells with receptors for insulin.
FIGURE 4Summarized mechanisms of neuroprotective effects of Cinnamomum plants. Abbreviations: SIRT1, Sirtuin 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; iNOS, inducible Nitric Oxide synthase; TNF-γ, tumor necrosis factor; COX-2, Cyclooxygenase-2; NF-kB, Nuclear Factor- Kappa B; p65 (RelA subunit of NF-κB family of transcription factors); Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; IL-1b, Interleukin-1beta; IL-6, Interleukin 6.
Description of recent clinical studies related to pharmacological activity of natural compounds from Cinnamomum species.
| Pharmacological activity | Clinical trial/study design (type, patients included) | Period, country | Intervention (doses of | Standard comparison | The most representative clinical outcomes | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 diabetes | Two groups included: Cinnamon- group 1,2, 3 | Department of Human Nutrition, NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsule of | Placebo | ↓serum glucose (18–29%), ↓TG (23–30%), ↓LDL-C (7–27%) ↓total cholesterol (12–26%) |
|
| Placebo- group 4, 5, 6 | ||||||
| Cinnamon group: 60 patients | ||||||
| Age 52.2 ± 6.32 years | ||||||
| Not on insulin therapy | ||||||
| Not taking other medicine | ||||||
| Fasting blood glucose | ||||||
| Levels 7.8–22.2 mmol/L | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group: 33 patients, age 62·8 ± 8·37 | Hannover, Germany | Cinnamon group: Extract 112 mg aqueous cinnamon extract placebo: Microcrystalline cellulose 3 g powder per day, three times a day for 4 months | Placebo | ↓glucose levels up to 10.3% |
|
| Body weight 88·5 ± 19·1 kg | ||||||
| HbA1c 6.7–6.9% | ||||||
| Placebo group: 32 patients age 63·7 ± 7·17 years | ||||||
| Body weight 89·9 ± 14·1 kg | ||||||
| HbA1c 6.7–6.9% | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group | Netherlands | Cinnamon group: 500 mg of | Placebo | ↓plasma glucose, ↓plasma insulin, ↓total cholesterol, ↓LDL, ↓TG ↓HDL ↓HbA1c |
|
| 12 postmenopausal women age 62 ± 2 years | ||||||
| Body weight 85.4 ± 3.6 kg | ||||||
| Placebo group: 13 patients | ||||||
| Age 64 ± 2 years | ||||||
| Body weight 82.2 ± 4.0 kg | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group: 30 patients | US | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsule of | Placebo | No significant change in FBG, lipid for cinnamon group |
|
| Age 63.6 years | ||||||
| Placebo: 22 patients | ||||||
| Age 58.0 years | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group: 55 patients | United States military base, May 2007 to August 2007 | Cinnamon group: Capsules 500 mg capsule of | Control | Cinnamon group ↓ HbA1c |
|
| Age 60.5 ± 10.7 | ||||||
| HbA1c ≥ 7.0% control group: 54 patients | ||||||
| Age 59.9 ± 9.2 years | ||||||
| HbA1c ≥ 7.0% | ||||||
| Multi-ethnic type 2 diabetic | Cinnamon group: 58 patients, age 54.9 ± 9.8 years | October 2007 to January 2009, United Kingdom | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsule of | Placebo | ↓HbA1c ↓FPG ↓BMI |
|
| Body weight 74.94 ± 13.34; FPG≥ 7 mmol/L | ||||||
| HbA1c ≥ 7.0% placebo group: 22 patients | ||||||
| Age 55.67 ± 7.98 years | ||||||
| Body weight 73.02 ± 10.38 years FPG≥7 mmol⁄l | ||||||
| HbA1c ≥ 7.0% | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group: 22 patients | Tehran, Iran | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsule of | Placebo | No significant difference in cinnamon and placebo group on HbA1c, ↓TG, ↓Insulin ↑ LDL-C |
|
| Age 54.11 ± 10.37 years | ||||||
| Body weight 74.94 ± 13.34 | ||||||
| Placebo group: 22 patients | ||||||
| Age 55.67 ± 7.98 years | ||||||
| Body weight 73.02 ± 10.38 kg | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group: 137 patients | Beijing and dalian, China | Cinnamon group: Water extract of cinnamon and CinSulin®, 250 mg/capsule placebo: 500 mg capsule, wheat flour daily, twice a day for 2 months | Placebo | ↓LDL-C ↓HDL ↓HOMA-IR |
|
| Age 61.3 ± 0.8 years | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cross-over study cinnamon group:10 sedentary obese females | Texas, United States | Cinnamon group: 1–6 g/day powder of | Placebo | No differences observed in blood glucose, serum insulin, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance |
|
| Age 22.7 ± 4 years | ||||||
| Body weight 104.42 ± 16.75 kg | ||||||
| Take oral/intrauterine contraceptives | ||||||
| Prescription medications | ||||||
| Over-the-counter weight loss pills | ||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | Cinnamon group: 40 patients | September 2012 to December 2012, Iran | Cinnamon group | Control | ↓sICAM-1 |
|
| Age 54.15 ± 1.0 years | ||||||
| Weight 75.62 ± 1.2 kg | ||||||
| Control group:40 patients | ||||||
| Age 53.64 ± 1.3 years | ||||||
| Weight 78.74 ± 1.2 kg | ||||||
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | Herbal medicine plus lifestyle intervention study | August 2012 to January 2014, Australia |
| Lifestyle intervention | ↓ oligomenorrhoea ↓ BMI ↓ weight |
|
| Cinnamon group: 60 overweight women | ||||||
| Age 29.2 ± 5.6 years | ||||||
| Weight 93.2 ± 18.9 kg | ||||||
| Lifestyle intervention group: 62 patients age 28.9 ± 5.6 | ||||||
| Weight 97.3 ± 21.3 kg | ||||||
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | Cinnamon group: 29 patients | Iran | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsules (450 mg capsule of starch and 50 mg cinnamon powder): 1.5 g per day three times, after a meal with 10 mg medroxyprogesterone tablet from 15th day of menstruation cycle for 10 days for 12 weeks | Placebo | ↓fasting insulin, ↓HOMA-IR, ↓LDL, ↓TG, ↓testosterone, ↓ insulin, ↓ weight ↓HbA1c |
|
| Age 18–45 years | ||||||
| Weight 68.24 ± 9.68 kg | ||||||
| Placebo group: 30 patients | ||||||
| Age 18–45 years | ||||||
| 63.26 ± 11.62 kg | ||||||
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | Cinnamon group: 42 patients with rotterdam criteria | september 2015 to januray 2016, tehran, Iran | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsule/day placebo: Wheat flour: 1.5 g per day for 8 weeks | Placebo | ↑antioxidant capacity ↓malondialdehyde↓ BMI |
|
| Age 29.26 years | ||||||
| Placebo group: 42 patients with rotterdam criteria | ||||||
| Age 30 years | ||||||
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | Cinnamon group: 42 patients with rotterdam criteria | Mohheb Yas Hospital, Tehran, Iran, October 2015 to February 2016 | Cinnamon group: 500 mg capsule/day placebo: Wheat flour: 1.5 g per day for 8 weeks | Placebo | ↓TG, ↓BMI, ↓TC ↓HOMA-IR ↓insulin, ↓ LDL-C HDL-C unchanged |
|
| Age 29.3 years | ||||||
| Weight 76.6 kg | ||||||
| Placebo group: 42 patients with rotterdam criteria | ||||||
| Age 30.2 years | ||||||
| Weight 77.7 kg | ||||||
| Polycystic ovarian syndrome | Cinnamon group | March 2011 to April 2014 to United States | Cinnamon (125 mg capsule) or placebo: 1.5 gm per day for 6 months | Placebo | ↑ homa-ir |
|
| 11 patients, age 18–38 years with oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea | ||||||
| Placebo group: 6 patients | ||||||
| Age 18–38 years | ||||||
| Polycystic ovarian syndrome | DLBS3233: 18 patients | March 2013 and June 2015 at yasmin clinic, RSCM kencana, jakarta and hasan sadikin hospital, bandung | DLBS3233 ( | Control | ↓AMH level |
|
| Metformin group: 22 patients | ||||||
| Polycystic ovarian syndrome | Patients age 23.29 ± 5.10 with rotterdam, overweight or obese | Saudi Arabia | Cinnamon extract (336 mg/day) | Placebo | ↓BMI |
|
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | 40 patients age 18–30 years | 2017, ahvaz, Iran | 6 weeks | Intervention group | ↓weight glucose homeostasis no effects |
|
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | Cinnamon group: 20 patients, age 18–42 years with rotterdam criteria | December 2014 to March 2016, national institute of unani medicine (NIUM) hospital, Bengaluru | Cinnamon group: 750 mg capsule,1.5 g/day control group: 500 mg metformin twice a day for 60 days | Control | Menstrual cycle inprovment increased 51.9%, insulin resistance unchanged |
|