| Literature DB >> 34045659 |
Danijela Šantić1, Kasia Piwosz2, Frano Matić3, Ana Vrdoljak Tomaš3, Jasna Arapov3, Jason Lawrence Dean4, Mladen Šolić3, Michal Koblížek4,5, Grozdan Kušpilić3, Stefanija Šestanović3.
Abstract
Bacteria are an active and diverse component of pelagic commEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34045659 PMCID: PMC8159981 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90863-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Map of the Mediterranean Sea. (B) Study area and sampling stations in the Jabuka Pit (JP1), the Palagruža Sill (PS1, PS2) and the South Adriatic Pit (SAP1, SAP2, SAP3). The software MATLAB. version 7.10.0 (R2018). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc. (2018) (https://www.mathworks.com/) was used to generate the figure.
Figure 2(A) Bar plot representation of biotic (black) and abiotic (grey) parameters for neural gas best-matching units (picoplankton-PIC-BMUs) with relative frequency appearance for each neuron. TP-total prokaryotes, SYN-Synechococcus, PROCHL-Prochlorococcus, PE-picoeukaryotes, HNF-heterotrophic nanoflagellates, AAP-aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs, AAP%-portion of AAP, HNA% percentage of high nucleic acid content bacteria, LNA%-percentage of low nucleic acid content bacteria-LNA%, BP-bacterial production. (B) Water column distribution of Neural gas best-matching units (BMU, labels with numbers, and stained with a different colour for clearance, coloured non-labelled squares shows clarity) for measuring stations (SAP1-3, PS1-2 and JP1). The software MATLAB. version 7.10.0 (R2018). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc. (2018) (https://www.mathworks.com/) was used to generate the figure.
Characteristics of biological (abundances of total prokaryotes-TP, Synechococcus-SYN, Prochlorococcus-PROCHL, picoeukaryotes-PE, heterotrophic nanoflagellates-HNF, aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs(AAP); contributions (%) of AAP, High nucleic acid content bacteria-HNA and Low nucleic acid content bacteria-LNA%; and bacterial production-BP) and environmental factors in the sampling terms assigned to the neural gas clusters.
| Neural gas clusters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIC-BMU1 | PIC-BMU2 | PIC-BMU3 | PIC-BMU4 | PIC-BMU5 | |
| TP (106 cell mL−1) | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.26 ± 0.06 |
| HNA (%) | 65.39 ± 11.17 | 54.05 ± 5.54 | 51 | 43.62 ± 6.26 | 45.46 ± 3.38 |
| LNA (%) | 34.61 ± 11.17 | 45.95 ± 5.54 | 49 | 56.38 ± 6.23 | 54.54 ± 3.38 |
| SYN (103 cell mL−1) | 6.77 ± 2.01 | 0.68 ± 0.62 | 5.51 | 12.58 ± 4.07 | 7.68 ± 5.80 |
| PROCHL (103 cell mL−1) | 1.24 ± 0.31 | 0.36 ± 0.21 | 1.59 | 0.78 ± 0.64 | 1.68 ± 0.81 |
| PE (103 cell mL−1) | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.25 | 0.87 | 1.07 ± 0.20 | 0.83 ± 0.20 |
| HNF (103 cell mL−1) | 0.86 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.17 | 0.97 | 1.06 ± 0.49 | 1.13 ± 0.24 |
| AAP (104 cell mL−1) | 1.53 ± 0.31 | 0.18 ± 0.17 | 1.38 | 0.53 ± 0.42 | 1.51 ± 0.36 |
| AAP (%) | 5.79 ± 0.07 | 0.83 ± 0.66 | 5.34 | 1.89 ± 0.91 | 5.15 ± 0.73 |
| BP (104 cell h−1 mL−1) | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
| Temperature (°C) | 22.03 ± 0.62 | 14.43 ± 1.02 | 22.62 | 16.57 ± 1.37 | 21.70 ± 2.16 |
| Salinity | 38.81 ± 0.15 | 38.82 ± 0.10 | 38.75 | 38.87 ± 0.05 | 38.78 ± 0.08 |
| O2 (%) | 113.44 ± 5.42 | 96.21 ± 2.84 | 115.16 | 113.12 ± 11.56 | 112.35 ± 4.05 |
| NO3− (μmol L−1) | 0.21 ± 0 | 1.77 ± 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.40 ± 0.47 | 00.20.27 ± |
| NO2− (μmol L−1) | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
| NH4+ (μmol L−1) | 0.12 ± 0.10 | 0.48 ± 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.44 ± 0.24 | 0.39 ± 0.25 |
| TIN (μmol L−1) | 0.38 ± 0.09 | 2.37 ± 0.84 | 1.21 | 0.89 ± 0.39 | 0.70 ± 0.36 |
| N tot (μmol L−1) | 8.48 ± 3.22 | 8.13 ± 1.40 | 11.59 | 8.26 ± 3.16 | 7.02 ± 2.62 |
| N org (μmol L−1) | 8.09 ± 0.04 | 5.75 ± 0.06 | 10.38 | 7.37 ± 0.03 | 6.32 ± 0.02 |
| SRP (μmol L−1) | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.05 |
| P tot (μmol L−1) | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.06 |
| P org (μmol L−1) | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 1.29 | 0.17 | 0.10 ± 0.22 | 0.12 ± 0.32 |
| SiO4− (μmol L−1) | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 1.85 ± 1.29 | 1.27 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.22 | 1.08 ± 0.32 |
Mean values ± standard deviation from all the samples cluster in a PIC-BMU are displayed.
Figure 3Bacterial community composition (BCC) in the Jabuka Pit (JP), Palagruža Sill (PS) and South Adriatic Pit (SAP). For the most abundant phyla or classes BCC as the genus level is shown. (A) Relative contribution of the bacterial phyla and proteobacterial classes (B) Genus contribution in the Actinobacteriota (C) Genus contribution in the Bacteroidota (D) Genus contribution in the Alphaproteobacteria (E) Genus contribution in the Gammaproteobacteria (F) Genus contribution in the Cyanobacteria. Category ‘other’ groups taxa with the relative abundances below the threshold given in the parentheses. The figure was generated in R statistical software[35] (https://cran.r-project.org/ , v. 3.6.3), using ggplot2 v. 3.3.3 package[36], and they were assembled in Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/ , v. 0.92).
Figure 4Characteristic phylum contribution (bacterial community composition-BCC-BMUs) modelled using Neural gas. Samples associated with a particular BMU are shown in the panels. The software MATLAB. version 7.10.0 (R2018). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc. (2018) (https://www.mathworks.com/) was used to generate the figure.
Figure 5Characteristic genus contribution (A) Alphaproteobacteria (B) Gammaproteobacteria (C) Cyanobacteria (D) Actinobacteriota. The figure was generated in R statistical software[35] (https://cran.r-project.org/ , v. 3.6.3), using ggplot2 v. 3.3.3 package[36], and they were assembled in Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/ , v. 0.92).
Figure 6Characteristic genus contribution (A) Bacteroidota (B) Planctomycetota (C) Verrucomicrobia (D) Firmicutes. The figure was generated in R statistical software[35] (https://cran.r-project.org/ , v. 3.6.3), using ggplot2 v. 3.3.3 package[36], and they were assembled in Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/ , v. 0.92).
Figure 7(A) Number of observed ASV. (B) Values of Shannon diversity index and (C) Values of Pielou’s evenness index at Jabuka Pit (JP), Palagruža Sill (PS) and South Adriatic Pit (SAP). Average values ± standard deviations (error bars) from layers are shown.