Colin B Shore1,2, Gill Hubbard3, Trish Gorely3, Angus M Hunter1, Stuart D Galloway4. 1. Physiology, Exercise and Nutrition Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. 2. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. 3. Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Inverness, UK. 4. Physiology, Exercise and Nutrition Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. s.d.r.galloway@stir.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exercise referral schemes (ERS) aim to tackle non-communicable disease (NCD) by increasing physical activity levels through prescribed exercise. However, there is a sparsity of knowledge upon what exercises are prescribed and if they are targeted towards tackling NCD. METHOD: Mixed methods were employed. Quantitative data was extracted from exercise prescription cards of 50 participants and were assessed for frequency, intensity, type and time of prescribed exercise. Descriptive measures of aggregate data are expressed as median (range: minimum-maximum). Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews generated qualitative data on exercise referral instructors' experiences of prescribing exercise. RESULTS: Thirty-eight different types of exercise were prescribed. Median prescription was 4 (1-11) exercises per session, at a moderate intensity. Participants were prescribed a median of 35 (5-70) minutes of aerobic exercise per referral session. Exercise referral instructors prescribed exercise to improve activities of daily living, promote independence and autonomy of participants, rather than explicitly targeting the referral condition. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge that prescribed exercises are not explicitly targeted to the referral condition provides critical information in understanding the purpose of exercise prescription. Future evaluations of ERS should be mindful of this, that is, perceived outcomes might not match up to what is being prescribed within ERS.
BACKGROUND: Exercise referral schemes (ERS) aim to tackle non-communicable disease (NCD) by increasing physical activity levels through prescribed exercise. However, there is a sparsity of knowledge upon what exercises are prescribed and if they are targeted towards tackling NCD. METHOD: Mixed methods were employed. Quantitative data was extracted from exercise prescription cards of 50 participants and were assessed for frequency, intensity, type and time of prescribed exercise. Descriptive measures of aggregate data are expressed as median (range: minimum-maximum). Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews generated qualitative data on exercise referral instructors' experiences of prescribing exercise. RESULTS: Thirty-eight different types of exercise were prescribed. Median prescription was 4 (1-11) exercises per session, at a moderate intensity. Participants were prescribed a median of 35 (5-70) minutes of aerobic exercise per referral session. Exercise referral instructors prescribed exercise to improve activities of daily living, promote independence and autonomy of participants, rather than explicitly targeting the referral condition. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge that prescribed exercises are not explicitly targeted to the referral condition provides critical information in understanding the purpose of exercise prescription. Future evaluations of ERS should be mindful of this, that is, perceived outcomes might not match up to what is being prescribed within ERS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community-based research; Exercise prescription; Measurement; Physical activity; Prescription; Public health practice; Surveillance
Authors: Colin B Shore; Stuart D R Galloway; Trish Gorely; Angus M Hunter; Gill Hubbard Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-25 Impact factor: 3.390