Literature DB >> 3404473

The determinants of the step frequency in running, trotting and hopping in man and other vertebrates.

G A Cavagna1, P Franzetti, N C Heglund, P Willems.   

Abstract

1. During each step of running, trotting or hopping part of the gravitational and kinetic energy of the body is absorbed and successively restored by the muscles as in an elastic rebound. In this study we analysed the vertical motion of the centre of gravity of the body during this rebound and defined the relationship between the apparent natural frequency of the bouncing system and the step frequency at the different speeds. 2. The step period and the vertical oscillation of the centre of gravity during the step were divided into two parts: a part taking place when the vertical force exerted on the ground is greater than body weight (lower part of the oscillation) and a part taking place when this force is smaller than body weight (upper part of the oscillation). This analysis was made on running humans and birds; trotting dogs, monkeys and rams; and hopping kangaroos and springhares. 3. During trotting and low-speed running the rebound is symmetric, i.e. the duration and the amplitude of the lower part of the vertical oscillation of the centre of gravity are about equal to those of the upper part. In this case, the step frequency equals the frequency of the bouncing system. 4. At high speeds of running and in hopping the rebound is asymmetric, i.e. the duration and the amplitude of the upper part of the oscillation are greater than those of the lower part, and the step frequency is lower than the frequency of the system. 5. The asymmetry is due to a relative increase in the vertical push. At a given speed, the asymmetric bounce requires a greater power to maintain the motion of the centre of gravity of the body, Wext, than the symmetric bounce. A reduction of the push would decrease Wext but the resulting greater step frequency would increase the power required to accelerate the limbs relative to the centre of gravity, Wint. It is concluded that the asymmetric rebound is adopted in order to minimize the total power, Wext + Wint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3404473      PMCID: PMC1191653          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  11 in total

1.  Force platforms as ergometers.

Authors:  G A Cavagna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  MECHANICAL WORK IN RUNNING.

Authors:  G A CAVAGNA; F P SAIBENE; R MARGARIA
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  External work in walking.

Authors:  G A CAVAGNA; F P SAIBENE; R MARGARIA
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  The sources of external work in level walking and running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; H Thys; A Zamboni
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The determinants of the step frequency in walking in humans.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; P Franzetti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Groucho running.

Authors:  T A McMahon; G Valiant; E C Frederick
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-06

7.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1977-11

8.  The mechanics of walking in children.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; P Franzetti; T Fuchimoto
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The spring in the arch of the human foot.

Authors:  R F Ker; M B Bennett; S R Bibby; R C Kester; R M Alexander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 8-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Force development during sustained locomotion: a determinant of gait, speed and metabolic power.

Authors:  C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners.

Authors:  Philo U Saunders; David B Pyne; Richard D Telford; John A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Biomechanical analysis of running in weightlessness on a treadmill equipped with a subject loading system.

Authors:  Thierry P Gosseye; Patrick A Willems; Norman C Heglund
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Unconstrained muscle-tendon workloops indicate resonance tuning as a mechanism for elastic limb behavior during terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  Benjamin D Robertson; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bouncing between model and data: stability, passivity, and optimality in hybrid dynamics.

Authors:  Renaud Ronsse; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Myosin isoforms and fibre types in limb muscles of Australian marsupials: adaptations to hopping and non-hopping locomotion.

Authors:  Wendy W H Zhong; Christine A Lucas; Joseph F Y Hoh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.200

6.  Joint-level kinetic redundancy is exploited to control limb-level forces during human hopping.

Authors:  Jasper T Yen; Arick G Auyang; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The two power limits conditioning step frequency in human running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; P A Willems; P Franzetti; C Detrembleur
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Old men running: mechanical work and elastic bounce.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M A Legramandi; L A Peyré-Tartaruga
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The two asymmetries of the bouncing step.

Authors:  Giovanni A Cavagna
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running speeds.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.