Literature DB >> 34044100

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of invasive isolates of anaerobic bacteria from a large Canadian reference laboratory: 2012-2019.

Jessica D Forbes1, Julianne V Kus2, Samir N Patel3.   

Abstract

Anaerobic bacteria can cause severe and life threatening infections. Susceptibility data are relatively limited on anaerobic organisms despite the clinical importance in guiding empiric treatment of infections. To determine antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clinically significant anaerobic bacteria, isolates obtained from sterile sites submitted to Public Health Ontario Laboratory (2012-2019) were included in this study (N = 5712). Cefoxitin, clindamycin, metronidazole, meropenem, penicillin and piperacillin-tazobactam were tested using the gradient strip method with MICs interpreted based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Bacteroides spp. (N = 958; 16.7%), Clostridium spp. (N = 798; 14.0%), Cutibacterium spp. (N =659; 11.5%) and Actinomyces spp. (N = 551; 7.0%) were the most commonly isolated genera. Bacteroides fragilis isolates were susceptible to cefoxitin (88.4%), clindamycin (68.4%), metronidazole (96.0%), meropenem (99.0%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (98.4%). Other Bacteroides spp. showed reduced susceptibility to several antimicrobials. Clostridium spp. isolates were susceptible to penicillin (69.7%), clindamycin (69.7%) and cefoxitin (76.3%); C. perfringens and C. ramosum showed distinct susceptibility profiles. Susceptibility rates among anaerobes remained relatively unchanged over 8 years with a few exceptions: C. perfringens susceptibility to clindamycin decreased from 91.3% to 60% (p = 0.03); Clostridium spp. susceptibility to penicillin similarly decreased from 82.1% to 65.9% (p = 0.03); Eggerthella spp. susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam decreased from 100% to 24.3% (p < 0.001); B. fragilis group susceptibility to cefoxitin decreased from 70.4% to 48.2% (p = 0.05); and Parabacteroides spp. susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam decreased from 100% to 25% (p = 0.01). Our findings underscore the need for ongoing surveillance and periodic monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in order to guide empiric therapy. Crown
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobe; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34044100     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  3 in total

Review 1.  Time for Some Group Therapy: Update on Identification, Antimicrobial Resistance, Taxonomy, and Clinical Significance of the Bacteroides fragilis Group.

Authors:  Sophonie Jean; Miranda J Wallace; Gautam Dantas; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  Answer to October 2022 Photo Quiz.

Authors:  Marisa Azad; Vincent Deslandes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 11.677

Review 3.  Antibiotic Resistance and Mechanisms of Pathogenic Bacteria in Tubo-Ovarian Abscess.

Authors:  Huanna Tang; Hui Zhou; Runju Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.073

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.