Literature DB >> 34043782

Understanding Aging in Place: Home and Community Features, Perceived Age-Friendliness of Community, and Intention Toward Aging in Place.

Yeon Jin Choi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Promoting age-friendliness of communities and supporting aging in place (AIP) are of great importance. Based on processes of belonging and agency, which suggest that person-environment interactions influence residents' evaluations and behaviors related to the environment, this study aims to examine the interrelationship between the availability of age-friendly features, perceived age-friendliness of community, and intention toward AIP. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study used the 2015 AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey, which includes 66 home and neighborhood features under the 8 domains specified by the World Health Organization's Age-Friendly Cities Guidelines. A series of regression and mediational analyses were conducted to test hypotheses.
RESULTS: Overall, a greater availability of age-friendly features was positively associated with perceived age-friendliness of community and AIP intention. The relationship between age-friendly features and AIP intention was mediated by perceived age-friendliness of community (50.3%-96% of the total effects). When perceived age-friendliness of community was introduced to models, the direct effects of housing, outdoor spaces and buildings, and transportation domains remained significant. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that a greater availability of age-friendly features influences older adults' perception on their community, leading to the development of a desire to age in place, supporting processes of belonging and agency. Domains of housing, outdoor spaces and buildings, and transportation may be the most important features in promoting age-friendliness of community and the key determinants of AIP. Policymakers and practitioners may need to prioritize promoting an age-friendly built environment before the social environment in building age-friendly communities.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-friendly community; Built environment; Ecology of aging; Mediation; Person–environment interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34043782      PMCID: PMC8759482          DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  13 in total

1.  Access to transportation and health care utilization in a rural region.

Authors:  Thomas A Arcury; John S Preisser; Wilbert M Gesler; James M Powers
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  James F Sallis; Myron F Floyd; Daniel A Rodríguez; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Older Adults' Perceptions of Age-friendliness in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Cheryl Hiu-Kwan Chui; Jennifer Yee Man Tang; Christine Manlai Kwan; On Fung Chan; Michael Tse; Rebecca Lai Har Chiu; Vivian Wei Qun Lou; Pui Hing Chau; Angela Yee Man Leung; Terry Yat Sang Lum
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-05-17

4.  Age-Friendly Features in Home and Community and the Self-Reported Health and Functional Limitation of Older Adults: the Role of Supportive Environments.

Authors:  Yeon Jin Choi
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Living conditions as predictor of elderly residential satisfaction. A cross-European view by poverty status.

Authors:  Celia Fernández-Carro; Juan Antonio Módenes; Jeroen Spijker
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2015-02-20

6.  The Concept of Aging in Place as Intention.

Authors:  Mira Ahn; Jiyun Kang; Hyun Joo Kwon
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 7.  The association between the built environment and dietary intake - a systematic review.

Authors:  Elham Rahmanian; Danijela Gasevic; Ina Vukmirovich; Scott A Lear
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.662

8.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

9.  Advancing understanding of person-environment interaction in later life: One step further.

Authors:  Habib Chaudhury; Frank Oswald
Journal:  J Aging Stud       Date:  2019-11-18

10.  Park proximity, quality and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults: moderating effects of individual factors and area of residence.

Authors:  Jelle Van Cauwenberg; Ester Cerin; Anna Timperio; Jo Salmon; Benedicte Deforche; Jenny Veitch
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  1 in total

1.  Suggesting Indicators of Age-Friendly City: Social Participation and Happiness, an Ecological Study from the JAGES.

Authors:  Kazushige Ide; Seungwon Jeong; Taishi Tsuji; Ryota Watanabe; Yasuhiro Miyaguni; Hirotaka Nakamura; Miyako Kimura; Katsunori Kondo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.