Literature DB >> 34043108

Comparison between the effects of normal saline with and without heparin for the prevention and management of arterial catheter occlusion: a triple-blinded randomized trial.

Takahiro Tamura1, Eri Kobayashi2, Mariko Kawaguchi2, Yuki Matsuoka2, Akiko Fujii2, Masahiko Ando3, Yoko Kubo4, Takahiro Imaizumi3,5, Yasuhiro Miyagawa6, Takayuki Inagaki6, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the effects of saline with and without heparin on the catheter-occlusion rate and coagulation-related blood test results for the management of arterial catheters among patients admitted to a short-term intensive care unit postoperatively.
METHODS: This prospective, triple-blinded, randomized controlled study recruited patients aged 20-90 years scheduled to undergo radial arterial catheter insertion and postoperative intensive care unit admission between February and August 2019. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups (1:1 ratio) depending on the use of heparin: study (normal saline with heparin, 3000 units to 500 ml of normal saline) and control (normal saline without heparin) groups with arterial catheters. The allocated management method was employed immediately after intensive care unit admission. Occlusion assessment (every 12 h), arterial blood gas tests (every 6 h), and blood sample collection (every 24 h) were performed. The occlusion of arterial catheter was assessed using occlusion rate, and blood test results were assessed using a linear mixed model.
RESULTS: There were 147 patients in the arterial catheter groups. There were no significant differences in occlusion rates and changes in platelet counts and activated partial thromboplastin time between the groups with arterial (p = 0.98, 0.16, and 0.32, respectively) catheters during the first 6 days after intensive care unit admission.
CONCLUSION: Normal saline with and without heparin showed similar efficiency for both the prevention of occlusion and the results of coagulation.
© 2021. Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial catheter; Heparin; Occlusion management; Platelet count; Thrombocytopenia

Year:  2021        PMID: 34043108     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-021-02949-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

1.  Effect of heparin in arterial line flushing solutions on platelet count: a randomised double-blind study.

Authors:  Kelly F M Hall; Trish M Bennetts; Rob K S Whitta; Lorraine Welman; Peter Rawlins
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Comparison of normal or heparinised saline flushing on function of arterial lines.

Authors:  Rob K S Whitta; Kelly F M Hall; Trish M Bennetts; Lorraine Welman; Peter Rawlins
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Comparison of the patency of arterial lines maintained with heparinized and nonheparinized infusions. The Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Nursing Research Committee of St. Luke's Hospital.

Authors:  M L Hook; J Reuling; M L Luettgen; S O Norris; C C Elsesser; M K Leonard
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Comparison of normal saline and heparin solutions for maintenance of arterial catheter patency.

Authors:  G D Clifton; P Branson; H J Kelly; L R Dotson; K E Record; B A Phillips; J R Thompson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Heparinized saline versus normal saline in maintaining patency of the radial artery catheter.

Authors:  M Kulkarni; C Elsner; D Ouellet; R Zeldin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.