Background: Structural brain connectivity has been shown to be sensitive to the changes that the brain undergoes during Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Methods: In this work, we used our recently proposed structural connectivity quantification measure derived from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, which accounts for both direct and indirect pathways, to quantify brain connectivity in dementia. We analyzed data from the second phase of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and third release in the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies data sets to derive relevant information for the study of the changes that the brain undergoes in AD. We also compared these data sets to the Human Connectome Project data set, as a reference, and eventually validated externally on two cohorts of the European DTI Study in Dementia database. Results: Our analysis shows expected trends of mean conductance with respect to age and cognitive scores, significant age prediction values in aging data, and regional effects centered among subcortical regions, and cingulate and temporal cortices. Discussion: Results indicate that the conductance measure has prediction potential, especially for age, that age and cognitive scores largely overlap, and that this measure could be used to study effects such as anticorrelation in structural connections. Impact statement This work presents a methodology and a set of analyses that open new possibilities in the study of healthy and pathological aging. The methodology used here is sensitive to direct and indirect pathways in deriving brain connectivity measures from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and therefore provides information that many state-of-the-art methods do not account for. As a result, this technique may provide the research community with ways to detect subtle effects of healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.
Background: Structural brain connectivity has been shown to be sensitive to the changes that the brain undergoes during Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Methods: In this work, we used our recently proposed structural connectivity quantification measure derived from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, which accounts for both direct and indirect pathways, to quantify brain connectivity in dementia. We analyzed data from the second phase of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and third release in the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies data sets to derive relevant information for the study of the changes that the brain undergoes in AD. We also compared these data sets to the Human Connectome Project data set, as a reference, and eventually validated externally on two cohorts of the European DTI Study in Dementia database. Results: Our analysis shows expected trends of mean conductance with respect to age and cognitive scores, significant age prediction values in aging data, and regional effects centered among subcortical regions, and cingulate and temporal cortices. Discussion: Results indicate that the conductance measure has prediction potential, especially for age, that age and cognitive scores largely overlap, and that this measure could be used to study effects such as anticorrelation in structural connections. Impact statement This work presents a methodology and a set of analyses that open new possibilities in the study of healthy and pathological aging. The methodology used here is sensitive to direct and indirect pathways in deriving brain connectivity measures from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and therefore provides information that many state-of-the-art methods do not account for. As a result, this technique may provide the research community with ways to detect subtle effects of healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.
Authors: Juan Zhou; Michael D Greicius; Efstathios D Gennatas; Matthew E Growdon; Jung Y Jang; Gil D Rabinovici; Joel H Kramer; Michael Weiner; Bruce L Miller; William W Seeley Journal: Brain Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Paul M Thompson; Kiralee M Hayashi; Greig I De Zubicaray; Andrew L Janke; Stephen E Rose; James Semple; Michael S Hong; David H Herman; David Gravano; David M Doddrell; Arthur W Toga Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Madelaine Daianu; Neda Jahanshad; Talia M Nir; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2013
Authors: Reisuke H Takahashi; Estibaliz Capetillo-Zarate; Michael T Lin; Teresa A Milner; Gunnar K Gouras Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Natalie S Ryan; Shiva Keihaninejad; Timothy J Shakespeare; Manja Lehmann; Sebastian J Crutch; Ian B Malone; John S Thornton; Laura Mancini; Harpreet Hyare; Tarek Yousry; Gerard R Ridgway; Hui Zhang; Marc Modat; Daniel C Alexander; Martin N Rossor; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox Journal: Brain Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: David Abramian; Martin Larsson; Anders Eklund; Iman Aganj; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Hamid Behjat Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 6.556