Literature DB >> 3404201

Responses of simple and complex cells to random dot patterns: a quantitative comparison.

B C Skottun1, D H Grosof, R L De Valois.   

Abstract

1. There are several reports that random dot patterns are potent stimuli for cortical complex cells but not for simple cells. This finding is regarded as evidence against Hubel and Wiesel's hierarchical model of cortical circuitry, in which simple cells are the principal input to complex cells. We have reinvestigated the question quantitatively by recording responses to dot patterns from 106 cells in area 17 and the 17/18 border region of normal adult cats. 2. The cells were classified as simple (n = 62) or complex (n = 40) (4 were end stopped or hypercomplex) on the basis of whether they gave modulated (AC) or unmodulated (DC) responses to drifting sine gratings. 3. Although there are large within-group differences, we found both simple and complex cells that respond to bright random dots on a dark background, drifted across the receptive field at 3 degrees/s. The responses at the optimal direction averaged 6.2 and 18.1 spikes/s (spontaneous activity subtracted) for simple and complex cells, respectively. 4. We also recorded responses to drifting sine gratings. Complex cells were also found to respond more than simple cells to these stimuli. For each cell, we calculated a dot index expressing the dot response relative to grating response. The dot index averaged 0.43 for simple cells and 0.55 for complex cells. It therefore appears that much of the difference in response to dot patterns reflects a difference in general responsivity. 5. In subsamples of cells, we examined the effects of varying dot density, dot size, and drift velocity. These variables affect different cells in a manner largely independent of cell class. Most simple cells in our sample responded well to random dot patterns at several velocities, at two different dot sizes and at both 3 and 50% dot densities. 6. Our results agree with previous studies in showing that complex cells respond more vigorously than simple cells to dot patterns, but the fact that many simple cells also respond to these stimuli makes our results consistent with a hierarchical model of cortical circuitry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3404201     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

Review 1.  Complex receptive fields in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Luis M Martinez; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Contextual modulation of synchronization to random dots in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  S Shumikhina; J Guay; F Duret; S Molotchnikoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hierarchy of direction-tuned motion adaptation in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hyun Ah Lee; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns.

Authors:  R J Snowden; S Treue; R A Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Directional tuning of cells in area 18 of the feline visual cortex for visual noise, bar and spot stimuli: a comparison with area 17.

Authors:  J M Crook
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Translation-invariant orientation tuning in visual "complex" cells could derive from intradendritic computations.

Authors:  B W Mel; D L Ruderman; K A Archie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Areal influences on complex cells in cat striate cortex: stimulus-specificity of width and length summation.

Authors:  P Hammond; I M Munden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Parallel input channels to mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Enquan Gao; Gregory C DeAngelis; Andreas Burkhalter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The linearity and selectivity of neuronal responses in awake visual cortex.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Sanjiv Anand; Susana Martinez-Conde; Stephen L Macknik; Yulia Bereshpolova; Harvey A Swadlow; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Comparison of the spatial limits on direction selectivity in visual areas MT and V1.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; Nicholas J Priebe; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.