Philippe Dewolf1,2, Geraldine Clarebout3, Lina Wauters1, Joke Van Kerkhoven1, Sandra Verelst1,2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Flanders Belgium. 2. Faculty of Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Flanders Belgium. 3. Faculty of Psychology and Pedagogical Sciences Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology KU Leuven Leuven Flanders Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nontechnical skills (NTS) training on performance in advanced life support (ALS) simulation. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the ideal frequency of training sessions for an optimal retention and the value of debriefing. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, WoS, ERIC, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library conducted through August 1, 2018. All primary studies mentioning NTS in ALS education were included. Three reviewers independently extracted data on study design and outcome. The MERSQI approach was used to evaluate the overall quality of evidence. RESULTS: Of the 10,723 identified articles, 40 studies were included with a combined total of 3,041 participants, ranging from students to experts. Depending on the focus of the study, articles were categorized in NTS (n = 25), retention (n = 8), and feedback (n = 10). Incorporating NTS during ALS simulation showed significant improvements in timing for performing critical first steps. Furthermore, good leadership skills had a favorable effect on overall technical performance and teamwork during simulation improved team dynamics and performance. Finally, debriefing also had a beneficial effect on team performance. One particular type of debriefing does not appear to be superior to other types of debriefing. CONCLUSION: Team simulation training resulted in improved NTS and a reduction in the time required to complete a simulated cardiac arrest. Therefore, a formal NTS program should be introduced into ALS courses. Feedback and repetitive practice are key factors to train NTS. The impact of training on team behaviors can persist for at least 3 to 6 months. In conclusion, understanding and improving NTS may help to create more effective teams. The effect on patient outcome requires further investigation.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nontechnical skills (NTS) training on performance in advanced life support (ALS) simulation. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the ideal frequency of training sessions for an optimal retention and the value of debriefing. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, WoS, ERIC, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library conducted through August 1, 2018. All primary studies mentioning NTS in ALS education were included. Three reviewers independently extracted data on study design and outcome. The MERSQI approach was used to evaluate the overall quality of evidence. RESULTS: Of the 10,723 identified articles, 40 studies were included with a combined total of 3,041 participants, ranging from students to experts. Depending on the focus of the study, articles were categorized in NTS (n = 25), retention (n = 8), and feedback (n = 10). Incorporating NTS during ALS simulation showed significant improvements in timing for performing critical first steps. Furthermore, good leadership skills had a favorable effect on overall technical performance and teamwork during simulation improved team dynamics and performance. Finally, debriefing also had a beneficial effect on team performance. One particular type of debriefing does not appear to be superior to other types of debriefing. CONCLUSION: Team simulation training resulted in improved NTS and a reduction in the time required to complete a simulated cardiac arrest. Therefore, a formal NTS program should be introduced into ALS courses. Feedback and repetitive practice are key factors to train NTS. The impact of training on team behaviors can persist for at least 3 to 6 months. In conclusion, understanding and improving NTS may help to create more effective teams. The effect on patient outcome requires further investigation.
Authors: Elaine Gilfoyle; Deanna A Koot; John C Annear; Farhan Bhanji; Adam Cheng; Jonathan P Duff; Vincent J Grant; Cecilia E St George-Hyslop; Nicole J Delaloye; Afrothite Kotsakis; Carolyn D McCoy; Christa E Ramsay; Matthew J Weiss; Ronald D Gottesman Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Georges L Savoldelli; Viren N Naik; Jason Park; Hwan S Joo; Roger Chow; Stanley J Hamstra Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Diane B Wayne; Aashish Didwania; Joe Feinglass; Monica J Fudala; Jeffrey H Barsuk; William C McGaghie Journal: Chest Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Rosemarie Fernandez; Marina Pearce; James A Grand; Tara A Rench; Kerin A Jones; Georgia T Chao; Steve W J Kozlowski Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Darcy A Reed; Thomas J Beckman; Scott M Wright; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern; David A Cook Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.128