| Literature DB >> 34041423 |
Panagiotis Sfyridis1, Nataliia Shatelen2, Afksendiyos Kalangos1.
Abstract
Fibrosing mediastinitis can lead to superior vena cava obstruction by generating a fibroinflammatory mass in the mediastinum. Surgical caval reconstruction with conduits could be indicated for cases of unsuccessful or technically unfeasible endovascular stenting and angioplasty. The use of cryopreserved vascular homografts seems to be better than prosthetic conduits for mid- and long-term patency, as was observed in the case we have described in the present report.Entities:
Keywords: Fibrosing medistinitis, Homografts, Superior vena cava syndromex
Year: 2021 PMID: 34041423 PMCID: PMC8144109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.03.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ISSN: 2468-4287
FigA, Magnetic resonance venogram of superior vena cava (SVC) and upper limb venous system showing complete occlusion of the SVC. B, Magnetic resonance angiogram of thorax showing complete occlusion of the SVC and left brachiocephalic vein (white arrows). The absence of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft suggested intraluminal obstruction. C, An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan showing findings strongly suggestive of vascular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft infection. D, Intraoperative photograph of the reconstruction between the left subclavian–left internal jugular vein confluence and the right atrium (RA) with a thoracic aortic homograft and the connection of the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) with an iliac artery homograft to the thoracic aortic homograft. RV, Right ventricle. E, Postoperative CT angiogram at 3 years of follow-up showing a patent upper venous reconstruction with the two vascular homografts.