| Literature DB >> 34040597 |
Tangjian Peng1,2, Wanqing Liao1, Jingshu Wang1, Jie Miao3, Yuping Peng1, Guohua Gu1,2, Xueling Wu1,2, Guanzhou Qiu1,2, Weimin Zeng1,2,4.
Abstract
Low-temperature biohydrometallurgy is implicated in metal recovery in alpine mining areas, but bioleaching using microbial consortia at temperatures <10°C was scarcely discussed. To this end, a mixed culture was used for chalcopyrite bioleaching at 6°C. The mixed culture resulted in a higher copper leaching rate than the pure culture of Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans strain YL15. High-throughput sequencing technology showed that Acidithiobacillus spp. and Sulfobacillus spp. were the mixed culture's major lineages. Cyclic voltammograms, potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy unveiled that the mixed culture enhanced the dissolution reactions, decreased the corrosion potential and increased the corrosion current, and lowered the charge transfer resistance and passivation layer impedance of the chalcopyrite electrode compared with the pure culture. This study revealed the mechanisms via which the mixed culture promoted the chalcopyrite bioleaching.Entities:
Keywords: chalcopyrite bioleaching; electrochemical behavior; low temperature; mixed culture; pure culture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34040597 PMCID: PMC8141852 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.663757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Variations of (A) cell density and (B) pH during chalcopyrite bioleaching at 6°C. MHJ, bioleaching by the mixed culture. H2SO4 (9.2 M) was added to the leaching solution to maintain the pH at ∼2.5 from day 4 to 16 for the bioleaching systems, and from day 4 to 20 for the abiotic control. For each bioleaching system, a total of 418 μl of 9.2 M H2SO4 per 250 ml culture was added. For the abiotic control, a total of 455 μl of 9.2 M H2SO4 per 250 ml culture was added.
FIGURE 2Variations of (A) ORP and (B) ferric and ferrous iron concentrations during chalcopyrite bioleaching.
FIGURE 3Variation of copper concentration during chalcopyrite bioleaching.
FIGURE 4Heatmap of microbial communities of MHJ at (A) phylum and (B) genus levels. MHJ1_1, MHJ1_2 and MHJ1_3, MHJ2_1, MHJ2_2 and MHJ2_3, MHJ3_1, MHJ3_2 and MHJ3_3 were the triplicates of samples MHJ1, MHJ2, and MHJ3, respectively.
FIGURE 5Cyclic voltammograms of chalcopyrite electrodes in different systems.
FIGURE 6Tafel curves of chalcopyrite electrodes in different systems.
Tafel parameters of chalcopyrite electrodes in different systems.
| Ecorr/mV | Icorr/(μA/cm2) | |
| Abiotic control | 134.8 | 1.31 |
| YL15 | 121.4 | 1.49 |
| MHJ | 116.3 | 1.62 |
FIGURE 7Results of EIS. (A) EIS curves of chalcopyrite electrodes in different systems. (B) Simulated circuit RS(R1CPE1) (R2CPE2).
Fitting results using the analog circuit RS(R1CPE1) (R2CPE2) of the chalcopyrite electrodes.
| Sample | RS (Ω) | R1 (Ω) | CPE1-T | CPE1-P | R2 (Ω) | CPE2-T | CPE2-P |
| Abiotic control | 52.91 | 606.6 | 3.9625E–5 | 1.415 E–2 | 106.26 | 2.937E–4 | 6.310E–9 |
| YL15 | 52.12 | 486.3 | 1.133E–4 | 1.625E–4 | 167.6 | 1.8298E–5 | 1.003E–6 |
| MHJ | 54.49 | 227.4 | 2.349E–7 | 2.362E–6 | 147.49 | 5.898E–5 | 5.270E–8 |