Literature DB >> 34040125

Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes using da Vinci S, Si and Xi Surgical System for robotic gastric cancer surgery.

Toshiyasu Ojima1, Masaki Nakamura2, Keiji Hayata2, Junya Kitadani2, Akihiro Takeuchi2, Hiroki Yamaue2.   

Abstract

When compared with the second/third generation da Vinci S/Si, the fourth generation Xi surgical system may allow for greater efficiency and result in shorter operation times during robotic gastrectomy (RG) for gastric cancer (GC). We directly compare surgical outcomes between the conventional S/Si and the newer Xi robotic platform for the treatment of GC. This is a single-center retrospective study of 148 consecutive patients with GC who underwent RG. Of these patients, 20 patients were treated with the S, 30 patients with the Si, and 98 patients with the Xi. The overall operation time was significantly longer in the S group (386.5 min) than in the other groups (Si group: 292 min; Xi group: 297 min) (S vs. Si: P = 0.010; S vs. Xi: P = 0.001). We observed no difference, however, between the newer Xi and Si systems in operation time. Intraoperative blood loss was similar across the three groups. The overall postoperative complication rate in the Xi group (8.2%) was lower than that of the S group (10%) and the Si group (13.3%), but the difference was not significant. The newer Xi system did not provide significant intraoperative or early postoperative advantages over the Si system.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34040125     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90741-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

1.  Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Gregorio Di Franco; Simone Guadagni; Leonardo Rossi; Matteo Palmeri; Niccolò Furbetta; Desirée Gianardi; Matteo Bianchini; Giovanni Caprili; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Franco Mosca; Andrea Moglia; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial.

Authors:  Seungho Lee; Jin Kyong Kim; Youn Nam Kim; Dong-Su Jang; Yoo Min Kim; Taeil Son; Woo Jin Hyung; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer?

Authors:  Heli Liu; Takahiro Kinoshita; Akiko Tonouchi; Akio Kaito; Masanori Tokunaga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic complete lymphadenectomy at the splenic hilum during total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer (with video).

Authors:  T Ojima; K Hayata; H Yamaue
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.043

5.  Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Gregorio Di Franco; Valentina Lorenzoni; Simone Guadagni; Matteo Palmeri; Niccolò Furbetta; Desirée Gianardi; Matteo Bianchini; Giovanni Caprili; Franco Mosca; Giuseppe Turchetti; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comment on "The Relationship Between Lymph Node Ratio and Survival Benefit With Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-positive Esophageal Adenocarcinoma".

Authors:  Jun Lu; Dong Wu; Changming Huang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Bin Zhang; Hendi Maher; Xian-Fa Wang; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching: short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center.

Authors:  Shan-Ping Ye; Jun Shi; Dong-Ning Liu; Qun-Guang Jiang; Xiong Lei; Bo Tang; Peng-Hui He; Wei-Quan Zhu; He-Chun Tang; Tai-Yuan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Robotic radical lymphadenectomy without touching the pancreas during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyasu Ojima; Masaki Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Keiji Hayata; Masahiro Katsuda; Shimpei Maruoka; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Similar Operative Outcomes between the da Vinci Xi® and da Vinci Si® Systems in Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Seohee Choi; Chul-Kyu Roh; Won Jun Seo; Minah Cho; Taeil Son; Hyung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maurizio Zizzo; Magda Zanelli; Francesca Sanguedolce; Federica Torricelli; Andrea Morini; David Tumiati; Federica Mereu; Antonia Lavinia Zuliani; Andrea Palicelli; Stefano Ascani; Alessandro Giunta
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 2.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.