Literature DB >> 34040057

Genome-wide identification of potential biomarkers in multiple myeloma using meta-analysis of mRNA and miRNA expression data.

Amit Katiyar1,2,3, Gurvinder Kaur4,5, Lata Rani4,5, Lingaraja Jena4, Harpreet Singh2, Lalit Kumar6, Atul Sharma6, Punit Kaur7,8, Ritu Gupta9,10.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with diverse clinical phenotypes and molecular heterogeneity not completely understood. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and miRNAs (DEMs) in MM may influence disease pathogenesis, clinical presentation / drug sensitivities. But these signatures overlap meagrely plausibly due to complexity of myeloma genome, diversity in primary cells studied, molecular technologies/ analytical tools utilized. This warrants further investigations since DEGs/DEMs can impact clinical outcomes and guide personalized therapy. We have conducted genome-wide meta-analysis of DEGs/DEMs in MM versus Normal Plasma Cells (NPCs) and derived unified putative signatures for MM. 100 DEMs and 1,362 DEGs were found deranged between MM and NPCs. Signatures of 37 DEMs ('Union 37') and 154 DEGs ('Union 154') were deduced that shared 17 DEMs and 22 DEGs with published prognostic signatures, respectively. Two miRs (miR-16-2-3p, 30d-2-3p) correlated with survival outcomes. PPI analysis identified 5 topmost functionally connected hub genes (UBC, ITGA4, HSP90AB1, VCAM1, VCP). Transcription factor regulatory networks were determined for five seed DEGs with ≥ 4 biomarker applications (CDKN1A, CDKN2A, MMP9, IGF1, MKI67) and three topmost up/ down regulated DEMs (miR-23b, 195, let7b/ miR-20a, 155, 92a). Further studies are warranted to establish and translate prognostic potential of these signatures for MM.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34040057     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90424-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  48 in total

1.  A gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Kuiper; A Broyl; Y de Knegt; M H van Vliet; E H van Beers; B van der Holt; L el Jarari; G Mulligan; W Gregory; G Morgan; H Goldschmidt; H M Lokhorst; M van Duin; P Sonneveld
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Christopher P Wardell; T Cody Ashby; Michael Bauer; Faith E Davies; Adam Rosenthal; Hongwei Wang; Pingping Qu; Antje Hoering; Mehmet Samur; Fadi Towfic; Maria Ortiz; Erin Flynt; Zhinuan Yu; Zhihong Yang; Dan Rozelle; John Obenauer; Matthew Trotter; Daniel Auclair; Jonathan Keats; Niccolo Bolli; Mariateresa Fulciniti; Raphael Szalat; Philippe Moreau; Brian Durie; A Keith Stewart; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Marc S Raab; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Jesus San Miguel; Sagar Lonial; Graham H Jackson; Kenneth C Anderson; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil Munshi; Anjan Thakurta; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Gene Expression Profiles in Myeloma: Ready for the Real World?

Authors:  Raphael Szalat; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Reconstructing the evolutionary history of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Francesco Maura; Even H Rustad; Eileen M Boyle; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Salomon Manier; Karma Z Salem; Jihye Park; Dan A Landau; Gad Getz; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  A gene expression signature distinguishes innate response and resistance to proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A K Mitra; T Harding; U K Mukherjee; J S Jang; Y Li; R HongZheng; J Jen; P Sonneveld; S Kumar; W M Kuehl; V Rajkumar; B Van Ness
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.037

7.  A predicted risk score based on the expression of 16 autophagy-related genes for multiple myeloma survival.

Authors:  Fang-Xiao Zhu; Xiao-Tao Wang; Hui-Qiong Zeng; Zhi-Hua Yin; Zhi-Zhong Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Revealing the impact of structural variants in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Francesco Maura; Even H Rustad; Venkata D Yellapantula; Dominik Glodzik; Kylee H Maclachlan; Benjamin Diamond; Eileen M Boyle; Cody Ashby; Patrick Blaney; Gunes Gundem; Malin Hultcrantz; Daniel Leongamornlert; Nicos Angelopoulos; Luca Agnelli; Daniel Auclair; Yanming Zhang; Ahmet Dogan; Niccolò Bolli; Elli Papaemmanuil; Kenneth C Anderson; Philippe Moreau; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi; Jonathan J Keats; Peter J Campbell; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Blood Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-09-15

9.  A novel measure of chromosome instability can account for prognostic difference in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Chung; George Mulligan; Rafael Fonseca; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Eileen M Boyle; Christopher P Wardell; Alex Murison; Dil B Begum; Nasrin M Dahir; Paula Z Proszek; David C Johnson; Martin F Kaiser; Lorenzo Melchor; Lauren I Aronson; Matthew Scales; Charlotte Pawlyn; Fabio Mirabella; John R Jones; Annamaria Brioli; Aneta Mikulasova; David A Cairns; Walter M Gregory; Ana Quartilho; Mark T Drayson; Nigel Russell; Gordon Cook; Graham H Jackson; Xavier Leleu; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  HSP90β promotes osteoclastogenesis by dual-activation of cholesterol synthesis and NF-κB signaling.

Authors:  Hui-Min Cheng; Mingming Xing; Ya-Ping Zhou; Weitao Zhang; Zeyu Liu; Lan Li; Zuguo Zheng; Yuanchen Ma; Pingping Li; Xiaoxuan Liu; Ping Li; Xiaojun Xu
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 12.067

Review 2.  Multiple Myeloma Cell-Derived Exosomes: Implications on Tumorigenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Alessandro Allegra; Mario Di Gioacchino; Alessandro Tonacci; Claudia Petrarca; Caterina Musolino; Sebastiano Gangemi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 3.  The Significance of mRNA in the Biology of Multiple Myeloma and Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Anna Puła; Paweł Robak; Damian Mikulski; Tadeusz Robak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The Sec61 translocon is a therapeutic vulnerability in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gilles Dadaglio; Caroline Demangel; Antoine Domenger; Caroline Choisy; Ludivine Baron; Véronique Mayau; Emeline Perthame; Ludovic Deriano; Bertrand Arnulf; Jean-Christophe Bories
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 12.137

5.  Paired miRNA- and messenger RNA-sequencing identifies novel miRNA-mRNA interactions in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Kristin Roseth Aass; Tonje Marie Vikene Nedal; Synne Stokke Tryggestad; Einar Haukås; Tobias S Slørdahl; Anders Waage; Therese Standal; Robin Mjelle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.