Shelby R Simar1,2, Blake M Hanson1,2,3, Cesar A Arias1,2,3. 1. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - School of Public Health. 2. Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The advancement of molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has revolutionized the field of bacterial strain typing, with important implications for epidemiological surveillance and outbreak investigations. This review summarizes state-of-the-art techniques in strain typing and examines barriers faced by clinical and public health laboratories in implementing these new methodologies. RECENT FINDINGS: WGS-based methodologies are on track to become the new 'gold standards' in bacterial strain typing, replacing traditional methods like pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. These new techniques have an improved ability to identify genetic relationships among organisms of interest. Further, advances in long-read sequencing approaches will likely provide a highly discriminatory tool to perform pangenome analyses and characterize relevant accessory genome elements, including mobile genetic elements carrying antibiotic resistance determinants in real time. Barriers to widespread integration of these approaches include a lack of standardized workflows and technical training. SUMMARY: Genomic bacterial strain typing has facilitated a paradigm shift in clinical and molecular epidemiology. The increased resolution that these new techniques provide, along with epidemiological data, will facilitate the rapid identification of transmission routes with high confidence, leading to timely and effective deployment of infection control and public health interventions in outbreak settings.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The advancement of molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has revolutionized the field of bacterial strain typing, with important implications for epidemiological surveillance and outbreak investigations. This review summarizes state-of-the-art techniques in strain typing and examines barriers faced by clinical and public health laboratories in implementing these new methodologies. RECENT FINDINGS: WGS-based methodologies are on track to become the new 'gold standards' in bacterial strain typing, replacing traditional methods like pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. These new techniques have an improved ability to identify genetic relationships among organisms of interest. Further, advances in long-read sequencing approaches will likely provide a highly discriminatory tool to perform pangenome analyses and characterize relevant accessory genome elements, including mobile genetic elements carrying antibiotic resistance determinants in real time. Barriers to widespread integration of these approaches include a lack of standardized workflows and technical training. SUMMARY: Genomic bacterial strain typing has facilitated a paradigm shift in clinical and molecular epidemiology. The increased resolution that these new techniques provide, along with epidemiological data, will facilitate the rapid identification of transmission routes with high confidence, leading to timely and effective deployment of infection control and public health interventions in outbreak settings.
Authors: Paul Chapman; Brian M Forde; Leah W Roberts; Haakon Bergh; Debra Vesey; Amy V Jennison; Susan Moss; David L Paterson; Scott A Beatson; Patrick N A Harris Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Michael A Brockhurst; Ellie Harrison; James P J Hall; Thomas Richards; Alan McNally; Craig MacLean Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Francesc Coll; Kathy E Raven; Gwenan M Knight; Beth Blane; Ewan M Harrison; Danielle Leek; David A Enoch; Nicholas M Brown; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock Journal: Lancet Microbe Date: 2020-12
Authors: David Dylus; Trestan Pillonel; Onya Opota; Daniel Wüthrich; Helena M B Seth-Smith; Adrian Egli; Stefano Leo; Vladimir Lazarevic; Jacques Schrenzel; Sacha Laurent; Claire Bertelli; Dominique S Blanc; Stefan Neuenschwander; Alban Ramette; Laurent Falquet; Frank Imkamp; Peter M Keller; Andre Kahles; Simone Oberhaensli; Valérie Barbié; Christophe Dessimoz; Gilbert Greub; Aitana Lebrand Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Amogelang R Raphenya; James Robertson; Casper Jamin; Leonardo de Oliveira Martins; Finlay Maguire; Andrew G McArthur; John P Hays Journal: Sci Data Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 8.501