Sonali Sachin Ranade1, Ulrika Egertsdotter2. 1. Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Center (UPSC), Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), 901 83, Umeå, Sweden. Sonali.Ranade@slu.se. 2. Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Center (UPSC), Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), 901 83, Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is the process in which somatic embryos develop from somatic tissue in vitro on medium in most cases supplemented with growth regulators. Knowledge of genes involved in regulation of initiation and of development of somatic embryos is crucial for application of SE as an efficient tool to enable genetic improvement across genotypes by clonal propagation. RESULTS: Current work presents in silico identification of putative homologues of central regulators of SE initiation and development in conifers focusing mainly on key transcription factors (TFs) e.g. BBM, LEC1, LEC1-LIKE, LEC2 and FUSCA3, based on sequence similarity using BLASTP. Protein sequences of well-characterised candidates genes from Arabidopsis thaliana were used to query the databases (Gymno PLAZA, Congenie, GenBank) including whole-genome sequence data from two representative species from the genus Picea (Picea abies) and Pinus (Pinus taeda), for finding putative conifer homologues, using BLASTP. Identification of corresponding conifer proteins was further confirmed by domain search (Conserved Domain Database), alignment (MUSCLE) with respective sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana proteins and phylogenetic analysis (Phylogeny.fr). CONCLUSIONS: This in silico analysis suggests absence of LEC2 in Picea abies and Pinus taeda, the conifer species whose genomes have been sequenced. Based on available sequence data to date, LEC2 was also not detected in the other conifer species included in the study. LEC2 is one of the key TFs associated with initiation and regulation of the process of SE in angiosperms. Potential alternative mechanisms that might be functional in conifers to compensate the lack of LEC2 are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is the process in which somatic embryos develop from somatic tissue in vitro on medium in most cases supplemented with growth regulators. Knowledge of genes involved in regulation of initiation and of development of somatic embryos is crucial for application of SE as an efficient tool to enable genetic improvement across genotypes by clonal propagation. RESULTS: Current work presents in silico identification of putative homologues of central regulators of SE initiation and development in conifers focusing mainly on key transcription factors (TFs) e.g. BBM, LEC1, LEC1-LIKE, LEC2 and FUSCA3, based on sequence similarity using BLASTP. Protein sequences of well-characterised candidates genes from Arabidopsis thaliana were used to query the databases (Gymno PLAZA, Congenie, GenBank) including whole-genome sequence data from two representative species from the genus Picea (Picea abies) and Pinus (Pinus taeda), for finding putative conifer homologues, using BLASTP. Identification of corresponding conifer proteins was further confirmed by domain search (Conserved Domain Database), alignment (MUSCLE) with respective sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana proteins and phylogenetic analysis (Phylogeny.fr). CONCLUSIONS: This in silico analysis suggests absence of LEC2 in Picea abies and Pinus taeda, the conifer species whose genomes have been sequenced. Based on available sequence data to date, LEC2 was also not detected in the other conifer species included in the study. LEC2 is one of the key TFs associated with initiation and regulation of the process of SE in angiosperms. Potential alternative mechanisms that might be functional in conifers to compensate the lack of LEC2 are discussed.
Authors: T Lotan; M Ohto; K M Yee; M A West; R Lo; R W Kwong; K Yamagishi; R L Fischer; R B Goldberg; J J Harada Journal: Cell Date: 1998-06-26 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: José M Alvarez; Natalia Bueno; Rafael A Cañas; Concepción Avila; Francisco M Cánovas; Ricardo J Ordás Journal: Plant Physiol Biochem Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 4.270
Authors: A Chiappetta; M Fambrini; M Petrarulo; F Rapparini; V Michelotti; L Bruno; M Greco; R Baraldi; M Salvini; C Pugliesi; M B Bitonti Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Daniel Uddenberg; Silvia Valladares; Malin Abrahamsson; Jens Fredrik Sundström; Annika Sundås-Larsson; Sara von Arnold Journal: Planta Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 4.116
Authors: Ana Alves; Ana Confraria; Susana Lopes; Bruno Costa; Pedro Perdiguero; Ana Milhinhos; Elena Baena-González; Sandra Correia; Célia M Miguel Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 5.753