Literature DB >> 34038977

Fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy.

T Elger1, R Akolekar2,3, A Syngelaki1, C De Paco Matallana4, F S Molina4, M Gallardo Arozena5, P Chaveeva6, N Persico7,8, V Accurti7, K O Kagan9, N Prodan9, J Cruz10, K H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the chorionic villus sampling (CVS)-related risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancy after adjustment for chorionicity, nuchal translucency thickness (NT), intertwin discordance in crown-rump length (CRL), maternal demographic characteristics and serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG).
METHODS: This was a multicenter study from eight fetal medicine units in which the leadership were trained at the Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine in London, UK, and in which the protocols for screening, invasive testing and pregnancy management are similar. Data were obtained prospectively from women with twin pregnancy undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise elimination was used to examine whether CVS provided a significant independent contribution to the prediction of risk of fetal loss after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy characteristics, including maternal age, racial origin and weight, method of conception, smoking status, parity, chorionicity, intertwin discordance in CRL, fetal NT ≥ 95th percentile and free β-hCG and PAPP-A multiples of the median. Similarly, within the CVS group, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of the number of intrauterine needle insertions and size of the needle on the risk of fetal loss.
RESULTS: The study population of 8581 twin pregnancies undergoing ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation included 316 dichorionic and 129 monochorionic twins that had CVS. First, in twin pregnancies undergoing CVS, compared to those not undergoing CVS, there was a 2-fold increased risk of fetal loss at < 24 weeks' gestation and of loss at any stage in pregnancy. Second, the factors providing a significant independent contribution to the prediction of miscarriage or fetal loss in twin pregnancy were increased maternal weight, black racial origin, monochorionicity, and more so monoamnionicity, large intertwin discordance in CRL and increased fetal NT, and, in the case of fetal loss at any stage, there was also a contribution from assisted conception and low serum PAPP-A. Third, after adjustment for maternal and pregnancy characteristics, CVS did not provide a significant contribution to the risk of fetal loss. Fourth, in twin pregnancies that had CVS, there was no significant contribution to fetal loss from the number of intrauterine needle insertions or needle size.
CONCLUSION: The 2-fold increased risk of fetal loss following CVS in twin pregnancy can, to a great extent, be explained by maternal and pregnancy characteristics rather than the invasive procedure itself.
© 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  first-trimester screening; invasive testing; miscarriage; stillbirth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34038977     DOI: 10.1002/uog.23694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  1 in total

1.  Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies: Risk Factors of Fetal Loss.

Authors:  Ewelina Litwinska; Magdalena Litwinska; Bartosz Czuba; Agnieszka Gach; Sebastian Kwiatkowski; Przemyslaw Kosinski; Piotr Kaczmarek; Miroslaw Wielgos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.