| Literature DB >> 34037808 |
Y Andrea Prada1, Maria Soler2,3, Fanny Guzmán4, John J Castillo5, Laura M Lechuga2,3, Enrique Mejía-Ospino1.
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is one of the illnesses caused by Leishmania parasite infection, which can be asymptomatic or severe according to the infecting Leishmania strain. CL is commonly diagnosed by directly detecting the parasites or their DNA in tissue samples. New diagnostic methodologies target specific proteins (biomarkers) secreted by the parasite during the infection process. However, specific bioreceptors for the in vivo or in vitro detection of these novel biomarkers are rather limited in terms of sensitivity and specificity. For this reason, we here introduce three novel peptides as bioreceptors for the highly sensitive and selective identification of acid phosphatase (sAP) and proteophosphoglycan (PPG), which have a crucial role in leishmaniasis infection. These high-affinity peptides have been designed from the conservative domains of the lectin family, holding the ability to interact with the biological target and produce the same effect than the original protein. The synthetic peptides have been characterized and the affinity and kinetic constants for their interaction with the targets (sAP and PPG) have been determined by a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Values obtained for KD are in the nanomolar range, which is comparable to high-affinity antibodies, with the additional advantage of a high biochemical stability and simpler production. Pep2854 exhibited a high affinity for sAP (KD = 1.48 nM) while Pep2856 had a good affinity for PPG (KD 1.76 nM). This study evidences that these peptidomimetics represent a novel alternative tool to the use of high molecular weight proteins for biorecognition in the diagnostic test and biosensor devices for CL.Entities:
Keywords: Acid phosphatase; Cutaneous leishmaniasis; High-affinity peptides; Lectins; Proteophosphoglycans
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34037808 PMCID: PMC8149292 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03424-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem ISSN: 1618-2642 Impact factor: 4.142
Fig. 1Circular dichroism spectra of the tendency of secondary structures of each synthetic peptide in 30% v/v in trifluoroethanol with a peptide concentration of 0.1 mg mL−. a Secondary structure of a lectin reported with PDB code: 2DHI. b Pep2854 2D-folding with an α-helix structure tendency. c Pep2855 2D folding with an α-helix structure stronger tendency. d Pep2856 2D folding with a beta-sheet tendency
Fig. 2Top-ranked models obtained from CABS-dock docking with the peptide-RMSD values. The structures represent each of the peptides bound close to a sAP fragment of the conservative region corresponding to MVQVVHRHGARSALNDNTTEICGTLYPC (a–c). The structures represent each of the peptides bound close to the PPG binding at the conservative region (UniProt code: A4HM871030–1450) (d–f). The target region of glycoprotein is coloured in green, and the peptide is coloured in blue. The dotted region represents the most likely site for binding interaction according to the contact map
Physicochemical properties of synthetic peptides designed from lectin mannose-galactose-binding proteins
| ID peptide | Sequence | MW (Da) | C* | pI | 2D folding | #AA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pep2854 | HYSRTENMGTSNAC | 1569.68 | +1 | 8.58 | Alpha-helix | 14 |
| Pep2855 | KTFLKICKRPYVPSEP | 1905.31 | +4 | 10.5 | Alpha-helix | 16 |
| Pep2856 | INKQGDVTVLSNGNTQLT | 1901.08 | +1 | 10.14 | Beta-sheet | 18 |
*Net charge at pH 7.0; isoelectric point (pI); number of amino acidic residues (AA)
Fig. 3Biofunctionalization strategy onto a plasmonic sensor chip for SPR analysis of the binding interaction between each of the synthetic peptides with both sAP and PPG
Fig. 4SPR analysis of peptide interactions with both sAP and PPG. The sAP was tested in the concentration range from 5.2 to 104 nM, while for PPG, the concentration range was from 3.0 to 58 nM, enough to cover the kinetic curves. The sensorgrams are shown in continuous lines, while fitting curves are shown in dotted line. The figure included a sensorgram of the interaction of sAP and PPG with the sensor surface without immobilized peptide
Kinetic parameters of the interaction of synthetic peptides with sAP
| ID peptide | KD (nM) ± SE | kon (×106 M s−1) ± SE | koff (s−1) ± SE | R-square (R2 ≈ 1) | Chi (chi ≈ 0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pep2854 | 1.48 ± 0.10 | 3.15 ± 0.23 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.995 | 0.012 |
| Pep2855 | 4.42 ± 0.09 | 4.49 ± 0.63 | 0.019 ± 0.002 | 0.997 | 0.025 |
| Pep2856 | 15.6 ± 0.49 | 1.26 ± 0.30 | 0.020 ± 0.003 | 0.995 | 0.044 |
*SE, standard error of the mean. KD was estimated based on both steady-state affinity and kinetic steady-state 1:1 interaction model from three independent experiments
Kinetic parameters of the interaction of synthetic peptides with PPG
| ID peptide | KD (nM) ± SE | kon (×106 M s−1) ± SE | koff (s−1) ± SE | R-square (R2 ≈ 1) | Chi (chi ≈ 0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pep2854 | 5.0 ± 0.26 | 2.6 ± 0.10 | 0.014 ± 0.005 | 0.995 | 0.014 |
| Pep2855 | 2.7 ± 0.11 | 4.4 ± 0.09 | 0.012 ± 0.003 | 0.993 | 0.008 |
| Pep2856 | 1.76 ± 0.50 | 1.8 ± 0.01 | 0.001 ± 0.002 | 0.987 | 0.019 |
*SE, standard error of the mean. KD was estimated based on both steady-state affinity and kinetic steady-state 1:1 interaction model from three independent experiments