BACKGROUND: Complete histologic normalization is associated with improved clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is currently unknown what effect achieving histologic normalization has on the development of dysplasia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 495 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of UC from a tertiary center. Patients were categorized according to the best histologic assessment they had during their disease course: histologic normalization, histologic quiescence, or persistent histologic activity. We assessed dysplasia rates in these patient groups after achieving histologic normalization or histologic quiescence, or 8 years after UC diagnosis in those with persistent histologic activity. Kaplan-Meier graphs and Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate this effect. RESULTS: The incidence rate of dysplasia development after achieving histologic normalization was statistically significantly less when compared with the incidence rate after achieving histologic quiescence (P = 0.001) and in those with persistent histologic activity 8 years after UC diagnosis (P = 0.033). In multivariate analysis, at any point throughout UC duration, dysplasia development was statistically lower in those with histologic normalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.81) but not in those with histologic quiescence (aHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.10), compared with those with persistent histologic inflammation. When assessing the time after achieving histologic normalization, histologic quiescence, or 8 years post UC diagnosis in those with persistent histologic activity, we found that patients with histologic normalization had a subsequent decreased risk of developing dysplasia (aHR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.72), compared with patients without normalization. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic normalization is associated with a decreased risk in patients with UC of developing subsequent dysplasia, compared with patients without histologic normalization. These findings have implications for surveillance intervals.
BACKGROUND: Complete histologic normalization is associated with improved clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is currently unknown what effect achieving histologic normalization has on the development of dysplasia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 495 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of UC from a tertiary center. Patients were categorized according to the best histologic assessment they had during their disease course: histologic normalization, histologic quiescence, or persistent histologic activity. We assessed dysplasia rates in these patient groups after achieving histologic normalization or histologic quiescence, or 8 years after UC diagnosis in those with persistent histologic activity. Kaplan-Meier graphs and Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate this effect. RESULTS: The incidence rate of dysplasia development after achieving histologic normalization was statistically significantly less when compared with the incidence rate after achieving histologic quiescence (P = 0.001) and in those with persistent histologic activity 8 years after UC diagnosis (P = 0.033). In multivariate analysis, at any point throughout UC duration, dysplasia development was statistically lower in those with histologic normalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.81) but not in those with histologic quiescence (aHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.10), compared with those with persistent histologic inflammation. When assessing the time after achieving histologic normalization, histologic quiescence, or 8 years post UC diagnosis in those with persistent histologic activity, we found that patients with histologic normalization had a subsequent decreased risk of developing dysplasia (aHR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.72), compared with patients without normalization. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic normalization is associated with a decreased risk in patients with UC of developing subsequent dysplasia, compared with patients without histologic normalization. These findings have implications for surveillance intervals.
Authors: Ola Olén; Rune Erichsen; Michael C Sachs; Lars Pedersen; Jonas Halfvarson; Johan Askling; Anders Ekbom; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Jonas F Ludvigsson Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: N Jewel Samadder; John F Valentine; Stephen Guthery; Harminder Singh; Charles N Bernstein; Jonathan A Leighton; Yuan Wan; Jathine Wong; Kenneth Boucher; Lisa Pappas; Kerry Rowe; Randall W Burt; Karen Curtin; Ken R Smith Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: David T Rubin; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Corey A Siegel; Bryan G Sauer; Millie D Long Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: David T Rubin; Dezheng Huo; Jami A Kinnucan; Mina S Sedrak; Nicole E McCullom; Alana P Bunnag; Elin P Raun-Royer; Russell D Cohen; Stephen B Hanauer; John Hart; Jerrold R Turner Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Matthew Rutter; Brian Saunders; Kay Wilkinson; Steve Rumbles; Gillian Schofield; Michael Kamm; Christopher Williams; Ashley Price; Ian Talbot; Alastair Forbes Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 22.682