Literature DB >> 34036817

Using Predictive Modeling and Supervised Machine Learning to Identify Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

Kevin Y Wang1, Ijezie Ikwuezunma1, Varun Puvanesarajah1, Jacob Babu1, Adam Margalit1, Micheal Raad1, Amit Jain1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To use predictive modeling and machine learning to identify patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) following posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) for degenerative spinal pathology.
METHODS: Patients undergoing single-level PLF in the inpatient setting were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Our outcome measure of VTE included all patients who experienced a pulmonary embolism and/or deep venous thrombosis within 30-days of surgery. Two different methodologies were used to identify VTE risk: 1) a novel predictive model derived from multivariable logistic regression of significant risk factors, and 2) a tree-based extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm using preoperative variables. The methods were compared against legacy risk-stratification measures: ASA and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using area-under-the-curve (AUC) statistic.
RESULTS: 13, 500 patients who underwent single-level PLF met the study criteria. Of these, 0.95% had a VTE within 30-days of surgery. The 5 clinical variables found to be significant in the multivariable predictive model were: age > 65, obesity grade II or above, coronary artery disease, functional status, and prolonged operative time. The predictive model exhibited an AUC of 0.716, which was significantly higher than the AUCs of ASA and CCI (all, P < 0.001), and comparable to that of the XGBoost algorithm (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Predictive analytics and machine learning can be leveraged to aid in identification of patients at risk of VTE following PLF. Surgeons and perioperative teams may find these tools useful to augment clinical decision making risk stratification tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning; posterior lumbar fusion; predictive modeling; spine; venous thromboembolism

Year:  2021        PMID: 34036817     DOI: 10.1177/21925682211019361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Global Spine J        ISSN: 2192-5682


  2 in total

1.  Automatic detection and voxel-wise mapping of lumbar spine Modic changes with deep learning.

Authors:  Kenneth T Gao; Radhika Tibrewala; Madeline Hess; Upasana U Bharadwaj; Gaurav Inamdar; Thomas M Link; Cynthia T Chin; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Babak Saravi; Frank Hassel; Sara Ülkümen; Alisia Zink; Veronika Shavlokhova; Sebastien Couillard-Despres; Martin Boeker; Peter Obid; Gernot Michael Lang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.