Literature DB >> 34036805

Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Free-Standing Surgery Center: An Analysis of 500 Consecutive Cases.

Julio T Chong1,2, Meagan Dunne1,3, Brenden Magnan3, Joel Abbott4, Julio G Davalos1,3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective procedure for removal of large kidney stones; however, PCNL has traditionally been reserved for inpatient surgery. Certain cases are being performed entirely at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), known as ambulatory PCNL (aPCNL). Materials and
Methods: Five hundred consecutive PCNL procedures performed at a free-standing ASC between April 2015 and February 2019 were analyzed. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative characteristics, and postoperative data, including transfer to hospitals, 30-day readmissions, and complications > Clavien I, were recorded.
Results: The mean age of patients undergoing PCNL at the ASC was 57 (range: 16-86) and body mass index 30 (16-49). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) compositions are as follows: ASA 1 (6.5%), ASA 2 (56.2%), ASA 3 (37.2%), and ASA 4 (0. 1%). The mean stone burden was 30 mm (5-140). Standard tract dilation (24-30F) comprised 77% of cases. Ninety-two percent of cases were performed with a single tract, and 99% of cases had a ureteral stent as the only form of drainage (tubeless PCNL). The mean operative time was 104 minutes (32-305), and postanesthesia care unit time was 97 minutes (37-247). The predicted stone-free rate was 84%. Twelve patients (2.4%) required transfer to hospital, and the 30-day readmission rate was 4.2%.
Conclusion: aPCNL is a safe and feasible procedure if performed by a high volume endourologist, even within the confines of a free-standing ASC. It is our opinion that the utilization of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery facilitates high stone-free rates with minimal morbidity and low readmission rates. The institutional review board number is WIRB # 20171472.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory care facilities; feasibility studies; kidney stone; percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34036805     DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  2 in total

1.  The Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victor A Abdullatif; Roger L Sur; Ziad A Abdullatif; Sharon R Szabo; Joel E Abbott
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 2.  Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vineet Gauhar; Olivier Traxer; Esther García Rojo; Simone Scarcella; Maria Pia Pavia; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Eugenio Pretore; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Mariela Corrales; Ho Yee Tiong; Ee Jean Lim; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Chin-Tiong Heng; Jean de la Rosette; Bhaskar Kuman Somani; Daniele Castellani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.861

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.